Nathaniel Skywalker
DIG IN!!! RiGHT NOW!!!
- Oct 18, 2013
- 14,228
- 5,862
Even if they are close Crosby is clearly ahead, the matter between Jagr and Ovi might be part of regency bias as Ovi is really underperforming what his supporters would have hoped for this year to say the least.A bit, yes...I mean obviously this just one message board but the elites on the history board I believe have all three very close.
Agreed. I think with a trophy case like that people would be more open to ranking him higher than 5 all time. Plus he would have a true full peak season that we could reference to compare to a McDavid or a Jagr offensively. We also have to figure that he missed out on somewhere in the 140-160 range for points during the ‘11-‘13 stretch. We’d be looking at him closing in on 1700 points in real time right now. He’d have a chance to be the second all time scorer in NHL history (depending on how long he’d want to play). With a resume like that at career end who knows how high people would be willing to put him. Obviously this is pretty optimistic and a fantasy what if but really makes you think.Sometimes I really wish crosby never had his concussions. The 4 Harts 4 art 4 Lindsay's 3 richards and 2 smythes with 3 cups would be almost impossible to beat
Sometimes I really wish crosby never had his concussions. The 4 Harts 4 art 4 Lindsay's 3 richards and 2 smythes with 3 cups would be almost impossible to beat
Just looked at that. Very fair point. It’s all speculative anyway. Who knows if Crosby would be able to sustain the paces at his peak for full seasonsWhere’s the phantom Rocket coming from though? I’m guessing 2010-2011? The problem there is that he was only a goal ahead of Stamkos in the same number of games.
Where’s the phantom Rocket coming from though? I’m guessing 2010-2011? The problem there is that he was only a goal ahead of Stamkos in the same number of games.
Where’s the phantom Rocket coming from though? I’m guessing 2010-2011? The problem there is that he was only a goal ahead of Stamkos in the same number of games.
Stamkos’ goal totals tanking in the second half that year was a bit of an outlier though. While there’s no guarantee Sid wouldn’t have seen a similar fate, it does seem unlikely it would be as bad. He would have needed 19 goals in the final 41 games to beat Perry, which is the pace he’s averaged over his full career so far. It’s not the same situation as the Art Ross that year, where it was highly unlikely he wouldn’t have won had he stayed healthy, but I’d say it was still more likely than not that he would have won the Richard that year.
It’s a reach and what no one ever seems willing to concede is that a 2010-2011 season where Crosby plays the entire season alters everything.
The Art Ross is one thing; I can meet people halfway there. But the Rocket?
It’s not as simple as plugging in pretend totals of something that never happened into the final results of a second half of season that didn’t exist without Crosby.
That seems a bit nonsensical. Things would change to some degree, because of the games he plays in, but it’s not as if Stamkos magically doesn’t tank if he does. Calling it a reach is, well, a reach.
Crosby is also one of the best puck possession players ever though.Jágr was slightly better offensive player and Crosby's has edge over Jágr in defensive play. However I believe Jágr's contribution to team defense is underrated. Of course he didn't play defense in a classical sense but his unreal puck possession skills kept puck outside of his team defensive zone very effectively. The other team just can't score on you when Jágr has the puck glued to his stick.
Career wise it's hard to argue against Crosby, he won everything he could.
I completely agree. I just think that the possession effect on team defense is often overlooked in player to player comparisons.Crosby is also one of the best puck possession players ever though.
I agree with this, pretty much word for word.However I believe Jágr's contribution to team defense is underrated. Of course he didn't play defense in a classical sense but his unreal puck possession skills kept puck outside of his team defensive zone very effectively. The other team just can't score on you when Jágr has the puck glued to his stick.
In terms of impact, Crosby for sure. A generational player. I see Jagr as one tier below.Jagr is better offensively, maybe goal scoring too. Crosby overall.
No. 3 cups vs 1, better all around player. But Ovechkin will go down in history as maybe the greatest goal-scorer (if he overtakes Gretzky).Ovechkin has more hardware, more MVPs, similar points, more primary points, and nearly 50% more goals than Crosby in the same number of seasons - all while being a power forward.
Ovechkin > Crosby
Sometimes I really wish crosby never had his concussions. The 4 Harts 4 art 4 Lindsay's 3 richards and 2 smythes with 3 cups would be almost impossible to beat
And the Lombardi trophyAnd still possibly another cup or two... plus another Smythe.
And the Lombardi trophy
Life-long skip the line pass for Cedar Point.Plus a visit to the Playboy mansion.
This is the most ignorant and unknowing comment ever. You realize Crosby is constantly considered the best two way player in the game, right? That is voted on by NHL players so you obviously don't watch Crosby play.That would imply Crosby contributes something of significance defensively or on the PK.
He definitely doesn't.
Crosby is deployed for offense. Crosby's wingers have typically done the defensive heavy lifting for him. Crosby is a last guy back/first guy out type of player and he's never shut anyone down.