Player Discussion Jacob Trouba

[Bacon Artemi Bravo]

Because the the company that is the New York Rangers would be so generous? Hell no. Sorry, I side with the human, not the company.

What you’re saying doesn’t make a lot of sense. He agreed to the terms on his deal. Now he is trying to circumvent those terms.

 

[HatTrick Swayze]

Hate to stray too far from hockey talk, but Trouba is a professional athlete on the road 100+ nights a year. His wife is doing a residency. Someone(s) else is helping out a TON to raise that child. They can hopefully continue to help while he is in another city for 1 year while she finishes the residency. Or, they can all move - it's not unheard of.

I understand it's a lot to navigate and none of us would want to deal with this type of situation. But we don't make $8 million a year, and we aren't in the business of sports. He is. This needs to be finished.

The “he doesn’t want to break up his family” takes are so wild like he’s going to be Bruce Wayne’s cellmate in The Dark Knight Rises. Welcome to being a pro athlete? Have you heard of these things called nannies and airplanes? Wait til I clue you in to what millions of military families have to deal with in this country every day.

Well said. He has a contract. We offered it to him with certain terms in it. Is it his fault that somehow it got leaked Drury was trying to trade him? People blaming him can and should get f***ed.

His contract is a 15 team NTC. Not the full NTC he pouted his way into.

 

[Hunter Gathers]

If he’s poisoning the well by letting it be known league wide that he’s not willing to go, even if the team is acceptable per the list he created and terms on his contract(which is what Larry is implying), then the player is absolutely to blame. The contract allows for a trade to an acceptable team. It’s being implied that he’s not willing to go even if it’s within the contract to trade him.

Then the other team can deal with that and the ramifications of it if he's moved or waived. He's allowed to say he won't play. We can also waive him and send him to Hartford. If he doesn't report, we can then terminate his contract.

Do you guys have any clue that we have recourse here or are y'all just memeing at this point?

 

[Riche16]

Why do you think they still want to trade him? As of right now:

1. All the top FA forwards are gone so clearing the money would not let them get one
2. They have not signed a single defenseman and are not strong with defensive prospects so they don't have a replacement available
3. They don't need cap space this year to sign their last remaining RFAs
4. The coaching staff likes him and he's a key guy on the PK.

So unless they have a second trade already worked out that would require clearing cap space why do they want to trade him at this point? I don't think they care about the fans perception of the issue and neither does he. If he cared about that, then he wouldn't be so hesitant to go elsewhere.

Buying him out makes no sense (ignoring the fact that the buyout window is closed and they may or may not get another) because then you're just adding two additional years of cap hit and issues 1-4 above all still exist. Waiving him also makes little sense due to the above - especially since it seems he may actually have positive trade value and can be dealt in the offseason. If he had negative trade value they could just attach and asset and trade him to someone and even if he didn't report the other team could suspend him (and possibly terminate the deal) and still get the asset

You make some valid points here but you're kinda burying the lead in that Drury & the NYR wanted to & by all accounts were on the very verge of trading him away, in conference in fact.

He's the C of the team & there's just NO WAY he's going to suit up with that C on his sweater & play his heart out knowing full well that this happened & after his wife's "postponed by 1 yr" residency is up it's going to ultimately happen.

This is a lose / lose situation for this team. If he doesn't just accept a trade prior to the start of the season I don't see any other outcome other than placing him on waivers or buying him out.

He can't play for this team anymore.

 

[Hunter Gathers]

Hate to stray too far from hockey talk, but Trouba is a professional athlete on the road 100+ nights a year. His wife is doing a residency. Someone(s) else is helping out a TON to raise that child. They can hopefully continue to help while he is in another city for 1 year while she finishes the residency. Or, they can all move - it's not unheard of.

I understand it's a lot to navigate and none of us would want to deal with this type of situation. But we don't make $8 million a year, and we aren't in the business of sports. He is. This needs to be finished.

He can also just be waived, refuse to report to Hartford, and we can then terminate his contract. We have recourse. So does he. Everyone can exercise their CBA-given rights.

Brooks also said that everything between Trouba's camp and Drury has been professional and non-contentious. They ran with bad info. At this point, I don't even believe the Detroit stuff was serious.

Agreed. In fact, I believe I was the very first one to say that I didn't believe anything on the Detroit stuff and had largely written it off as nonsense.

 

[LOFIN]

I will say this, I understand it's a shitty f***ing situation from Trouba's side. But if the Trouba camp is deliberately blocking the move by making it clear to other teams he's not going to report, then the Rangers have to use their iron fist and assign him to Hartford. And he can choose not to go, and get suspended without pay.

His contract has a M-NTC. And if he and his agent are using the threat of not reporting to turn it into full NTC, you can't just lift your hands up and say we are screwed, have to bring him back. At that point, you go all the way to the Hartford route. It sucks for everyone involved, is not good for the locker room, and the perception around the league. But you can't be held hostage here either.

 

[Bacon Artemi Bravo]

Then the other team can deal with that and the ramifications of it if he's moved or waived. He's allowed to say he won't play. We can also waive him and send him to Hartford. If he doesn't report, we can then terminate his contract.

Do you guys have any clue that we have recourse here or are y'all just memeing at this point?

Regardless of recourse he’s back dooring his way through the process, trying to block a legal and legitimate move the rangers could be making. Probably also blocking any return that the rangers could get. Yes, if Larry is correct, he’s hurting the organization that I’m a fan of by not following the terms of a contract that HE agreed to. Perfectly reasonable to be upset about that.

 

[mas0764]

Brooks also said that everything between Trouba's camp and Drury has been professional and non-contentious. They ran with bad info. At this point, I don't even believe the Detroit stuff was serious.

And if Brooks is wrong - or worse, lying himself - then I don't have any problem with Trouba's conduct and have stated as much multiple times now.

 

[Pawnee Rangers]

Regardless of recourse he’s back dooring his way through the process, trying to block a legal and legitimate move the rangers could be making. Probably also blocking any return that the rangers could get. Yes, if Larry is correct, he’s hurting the organization that I’m a fan of by not following the terms of a contract that HE agreed to. Perfectly reasonable to be upset about that.

How do you know this? Now all of a sudden Larry is 100% right. We spend the entire season mocking the guy, saying he has no legit sources and that Drury runs a tight ship BUT this one instance he's spot on?

 

[McRanger92]

I commend Trouba for standing by his wife, I really do. My wife is a medical professional and I might do the same thing he's doing. That fact o the matter is, however, that because of Trouba's refusal to accept a trade that clearly Drury tried to orchestrate to make him happiest, the Rangers have now lost their ability to improve on last years team that wasnt good enough, due to non-hockey reasons.

So Trouba deserves the boos he will get if he is here on opening night. If it has an effect on the locker room in any way, thats fine too. The lack of accountability with this team was a little too clear on breakup day, and this is more evidence. Lot's of guys seem like they want to get paid and continue living the cushy life in NY, and winning is secondary. Igor, Lindgren contract situations are another example. Do these guys want to get the most money, or help the team win? Because if they want to get paid based on the highest percentage of the cap, or get more years despite being extremely injury prone, they can go too. We can come up short with or without them.

 

[Bacon Artemi Bravo]

How do you know this? Now all of a sudden Larry is 100% right. We spend the entire season mocking the guy, saying he has no legit sources and that Drury runs a tight ship BUT this one instance he's spot on?

I agree with this - it’s all hinged on Larry being right. Which who knows. Just going with what is out there right now.

 

[HatTrick Swayze]

He's allowed to do that and that team is allowed to terminate his contract if he doesn't report.

What, you think the team will just be stuck with a non-reporting player on their cap? Any team that he didn't report to via waivers could terminate his contract for non-compliance.



Then maybe we shouldn't have signed him to a contract for 8 years that included a NMC and then a m-NTC.

Almost like actions have consequences. Some of you guys seem to not get that.

Again, you have utter clowns on here openly suggesting Trouba's wife can be a homemaker, now. You really want to go down this argument path?

Why would any team trade for him and run the risk that they would have to go through this? It immediately nukes any trade value he had left.

 

[NYR BHK]

Philly wanted Trouba before he came to NY, it’s not the easiest living situation, but what about seeing if Philly would take him? Obviously NJ, NYI aren’t interested…Even if we took back one of their headaches in Ristolainen…wonder if that living arrangement would work for the Trouba family. Saves something like $2.9 million

 

[Pawnee Rangers]

And if Brooks is wrong - or worse, lying himself - then I don't have any problem with Trouba's conduct and have stated as much multiple times now.

I genuinely think Drury explored trading him. He could still be trying to work something out. Anything other than that at this point is just wild speculation. I also think Drury probably asked every player with modified NMCs to submit their list be FA started. It would be malpractice if he didn't. It didn't work out, life goes on. Just leave his wife and family alone. You could pay me 15 million a year to play hockey and I wouldn't leave my 8 month old son for the season.

I agree with this - it’s all hinged on Larry being right. Which who knows. Just going with what is out there right now.

If everything hinged on Larry being right, the world would be a dark, dark, comical place.

 

[mas0764]

I commend Trouba for standing by his wife, I really do. My wife is a medical professional and I might do the same thing he's doing. That fact o the matter is, however, that because of Trouba's refusal to accept a trade that clearly Drury tried to orchestrate to make him happiest, the Rangers have now lost their ability to improve on last years team that wasnt good enough, due to non-hockey reasons.

So Trouba deserves the boos he will get if he is here on opening night. If it has an effect on the locker room in any way, thats fine too. The lack of accountability with this team was a little too clear on breakup day, and this is more evidence. Lot's of guys seem like they want to get paid and continue living the cushy life in NY, and winning is secondary. Igor, Lindgren contract situations are another example. Do these guys want to get the most money, or help the team win? Because if they want to get paid based on the highest percentage of the cap, or get more years despite being extremely injury prone, they can go too. We can come up short with or without them.

He would actually get sympathy points if he accepted such a trade and then had to make it work with the inconviences (despite all the money he's paid).

It's that IF he's refusing or sabotaging, there is no excuse, and he cannot fall back on "I have to stay for my wife." There are ways around that, including her postponing her career. It's an option. And it's not misogynistic to suggest such, any more than it's misogynistic to suggest he can quit and she can support him (which is also an option since she's a doctor).

 

[The Crypto Guy]

So, he's getting torn apart for something that may or may not have happened?
If so that was a hatchet job by Brooks.

Drury came out and basically said “trouba knows what kind of a player i think of him as” (compliment), also said he’s has discussions with him and his agent that will remain private.

Don’t you think he would have just said “all the trade talks were complete BS” if it was all lies?

C’on.

 

[Pawnee Rangers]

Agreed. In fact, I believe I was the very first one to say that I didn't believe anything on the Detroit stuff and had largely written it off as nonsense.

It's too obvious. He's from Michigan so clearly Detroit wants him and he wants to go there.

 

[McRanger92]

The thing we have to keep in mind with Trouba, is that it's always f***ing something with him.

Needed playing time assurances to sign the ELC with the Jets

Contentious negotiations and a holdout after that because everyone and their mother knew he wanted to be back in the US

He and Overhardt strafed Gorton in the negotiations because Gorts blew all his bargaining power trading a first and a controllable asset at the same position for a guy who was a 2nd pair D on his best day even then.

Now he can't be traded because he's telegraphed to every team he's a poisoned asset until his wife finishes school.

The sympathy card is played out.

 

[Circus86]

One thing I wanted to say that in general (I hope this doesn't give off the wrong vibe and a bit OT) I dislike the idea that people with family and kids somehow should be in a different position or get special treatment over single people without family.

 

[LOFIN]

Drury came out and basically said “trouba knows what kind of a player i think of him as” (compliment), also said he’s has discussions with him and his agent that will remain private.

Don’t you think he would have just said “all the trade talks were complete BS” if it was all lies?

C’on.

Yup, a lot of the times it's not what these GMs (or coaches, or players) say, it's what they don't say. Drury's presser wasn't exactly a ringing endorsement for the captain of the New York Rangers.

 

[Riche16]

I genuinely think Drury explored trading him. He could still be trying to work something out. Anything other than that at this point is just wild speculation. I also think Drury probably asked every player with modified NMCs to submit their list be FA started. It would be malpractice if he didn't. It didn't work out, life goes on. Just leave his wife and family alone. You could pay me 15 million a year to play hockey and I wouldn't leave my 8 month old son for the season.


If everything hinged on Larry being right, the world would be a dark, dark, comical place.

Very admirable. But that isn't what his contract states.

It states that there are only 15 places he can't be traded to.

This isn't the 1st time a player was traded, in any sport, to another city only to have to inconveniently uproot his family & it won't be the last.

This is the world they live in. High stakes, where they are paid MILLIONS based on their performance & if/when those two don't align, the more than likely outcome is a trade & it means the family is on the move.

It comes with the territory. They all know that. Or should.

 

[McRanger92]

Very admirable. But that isn't what his contract states.

It states that there are only 15 places he can't be traded to.

This isn't the 1st time a player was traded, in any sport, to another city only to have to inconveniently uproot his family & it won't be the last.

This is the world they live in. High stakes, where they are paid MILLIONS based on their performance & if/when those two don't align, the more than likely outcome is a trade & it means the family is on the move.

It comes with the territory. They all know that. Or should.

Here's the rub. Jacob has never been told "No" in his professional life.

 

[Pawnee Rangers]

Very admirable. But that isn't what his contract states.

It states that there are only 15 places he can't be traded to.

This isn't the 1st time a player was traded, in any sport, to another city only to have to inconveniently uproot his family & it won't be the last.

This is the world they live in. High stakes, where they are paid MILLIONS based on their performance & if/when those two don't align, the more than likely outcome is a trade & it means the family is on the move.

It comes with the territory. They all know that. Or should.

All I'm saying is, no one here knows shit. No one really knows if his agent his calling other teams telling them he won't report (I don't believe that). What I do believe is that there are very few teams who could a) afford his contract and b) want the player. This is the reality and what Drury is up against. Everything else is just noise. I'd like to see him wearing a different uniform next season but if not, I'm not gonna act like a f***head and take personal shots at him or his wife based on pure rumors.

 

[nyrob13]

Why do you think they still want to trade him? As of right now:

1. All the top FA forwards are gone so clearing the money would not let them get one
2. They have not signed a single defenseman and are not strong with defensive prospects so they don't have a replacement available
3. They don't need cap space this year to sign their last remaining RFAs
4. The coaching staff likes him and he's a key guy on the PK.

So unless they have a second trade already worked out that would require clearing cap space why do they want to trade him at this point? I don't think they care about the fans perception of the issue and neither does he. If he cared about that, then he wouldn't be so hesitant to go elsewhere.

Buying him out makes no sense (ignoring the fact that the buyout window is closed and they may or may not get another) because then you're just adding two additional years of cap hit and issues 1-4 above all still exist. Waiving him also makes little sense due to the above - especially since it seems he may actually have positive trade value and can be dealt in the offseason. If he had negative trade value they could just attach and asset and trade him to someone and even if he didn't report the other team could suspend him (and possibly terminate the deal) and still get the asset

I don't think not being able to sign anyone yesterday should be the reason we keep him. We can still upgrade.

Lindgren + Kakko for Theodore
Sign Schultz
Sign Sprong

Kreider Mika Smith
Panarin Trocheck Laf
Cuylle Chytil Sprong
Vesey Carrick Edstrom/Rempe

Miller Fox
Theodore Schneider
Jones Schultz

Accrue more cap space, control of all future 1sts, Berard/Othmann/Perreault/Sykora on the way.

 

[Pawnee Rangers]

I commend Trouba for standing by his wife, I really do. My wife is a medical professional and I might do the same thing he's doing. That fact o the matter is, however, that because of Trouba's refusal to accept a trade that clearly Drury tried to orchestrate to make him happiest, the Rangers have now lost their ability to improve on last years team that wasnt good enough, due to non-hockey reasons.

So Trouba deserves the boos he will get if he is here on opening night. If it has an effect on the locker room in any way, thats fine too. The lack of accountability with this team was a little too clear on breakup day, and this is more evidence. Lot's of guys seem like they want to get paid and continue living the cushy life in NY, and winning is secondary. Igor, Lindgren contract situations are another example. Do these guys want to get the most money, or help the team win? Because if they want to get paid based on the highest percentage of the cap, or get more years despite being extremely injury prone, they can go too. We can come up short with or without them.

The thing is, the guys on the team love him. And they haven't lost thier ability to upgrade. It's July freaking 2nd.