Machinehead
HFNYR MVP
*squints*Um they both are. The one on the right is the one that separates offense/defense
Or am I going insane?
NOW I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON!!!
*squints*Um they both are. The one on the right is the one that separates offense/defense
Or am I going insane?
Yeah. Now I'm definitely extremely confused*squints*
NOW I DON'T KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON!!!
No, I think you might be right, they're both game by game.Yeah. Now I'm definitely extremely confused![]()
The lack of offense is by design, not inexcusable lol.It is a disgrace that it has taken this long for a huge number of hockey fans to take note of the Slavster - **** you, Gary - but I have also long said he’s quite overrated by his fan club (which includes me). The lack of offense is inexcusable. Peak Ekholm was just as valuable, for example.
Yeah but counterpoint: it goes back to the start of the season, not just 2 months. Your rebuttal? We've switched sides lolNo, I think you might be right, they're both game by game.
Slavin having "more" offense doesn't mean he's better at offense, it's just that offense scores you more brownie points. The team that scores more goals wins.
Yeah but counterpoint: it goes back to the start of the season, not just 2 months. Your rebuttal? We've switched sides lol
MY BRAIN HURTS
Kovacevic is very, very good.So in the time it took you two to confuse each other, I went to the website where those cards originated and found that it has <checks notes> Johnathan Kovacevic as not just better, but a LOT better defensively than Slavin. Like, a LOT better.
I’m just gonna rest my case on that.
I’m assuming that was him trying to say the quoted chart was irrelevant because of that.Kovacevic is very, very good.
But I wouldn't go that far.
Mine's all gone. I.... lost itMeowth gets you 500 stardust in Pokémon Go.
I don't know if I like "irrelevant." You have to take each piece of data with a grain of salt and look at other pieces of data, as well as viewings. I don't agree that Kovacevic is better.I’m assuming that was him trying to say the quoted chart was irrelevant because of that.
Irrelevant? Probably not entirely. To be looked at with a critical eye? AlwaysI’m assuming that was him trying to say the quoted chart was irrelevant because of that.
Why make a thoughtful argument based on the eye test and statistical analysis when you can just go to www.imright.com and pull up a stupid WAR chart to do it for you!?So in the time it took you two to confuse each other, I went to the website where those cards originated and found that it has <checks notes> Johnathan Kovacevic as not just better, but a LOT better defensively than Slavin. Like, a LOT better.
I’m just gonna rest my case on that.
I'd take his d partner in the tournament over him ten times out of 10Can Jacob Slavin make a case as the most valuable dman in the NHL?
To me as a goalie who played competitive hockey all my life I really appreciated the defensive guys.
Watching the 4 nations I really had a chance to watch slavin (and every other dman there and I’m a leafs fan who is Canadian so there is zero bias here).
To me a player who single handedly stop 3 goals is more important to a team than a guy who scores one. Makar for an example while still very good defensively is still not close to his level as a shut down defender. He lead the Americans in TOI and without him they likely would have lost 4-2. A guy that can run a top PP like DeAngelo or a prime Tyson Barrie is so much easier to find than a defender that can log 25 minutes of good 2way hockey.
I guess the big argument I have is the Vancouver Canucks imo would be so much better with DeAngelo and Slavin in and Quinn Hughes out
Am I the only one who sees him in the Makar conversation?
Why make a thoughtful argument based on the eye test and statistical analysis when you can just go to www.imright.com and pull up a stupid WAR chart to do it for you!?
WAR is ridiculous in hockey. It works for baseball.