seanlinden
Registered User
- Apr 28, 2009
- 25,436
- 1,856
Wait. The Flames eat salary and go forward with Murray as part of their tandem? Are you serious here?
If they're going to rebuild... for 1 year... absolutely.
Wait. The Flames eat salary and go forward with Murray as part of their tandem? Are you serious here?
Kadri contract was bad the moment they started talking about it, didn't expect much. Huberdeau was misused for the bulk of the year, new team and a huge payday. Fully expect him to bounce back to a PPG player. Markstrom was, for me, the most disappointing of the bunch. No real changes or excuses, just plain bad.Agreed. It's pretty clear to me Kadri and Huberdeau are full out cap dumps. We'd need to add assets to them or retain to move them. Just saying Markstrom isn't as clear in terms of value. I know he's not getting a 1st or top notch prospect back, but I don't know if we could get a 2nd and 4th for him or would need to add a 2nd and 4th to move him.
10 years since salary retention was instituted. Flames actually did it once though - they retained 50% of Rittich's salary in the trade deadline deal that sent him to the Leafs in 2021.I cynically would have agreed on this a year or two ago. But with the Sutter firing and the annoyingly detailed interviews for GM and coach, I'm willing to sit back and give CSEC and ownership some props and be optimistic on this.
Biggest props would be seeing Conroy doing some trades with salary retention though. I think it's been like 20+ years since salary retention was a thing for trades? Prior to Treliving, decade+ for buyouts (but no idea why they'd greenlight buyouts over salary retention).
How did I miss that Rittich's deal was retained? Good catch.10 years since salary retention was instituted. Flames actually did it once though - they retained 50% of Rittich's salary in the trade deadline deal that sent him to the Leafs in 2021.
Can't say I'm as optimistic about the CSEC as you though. They seem like slow learners. But in this case, I hope they do institute a ban on trading with the Leafs regardless since the Flames never seem to win those anyway.
That makes no sense.If they're going to rebuild... for 1 year... absolutely.
That makes no sense.
If the Flames rebuild, they aren't taking on Matt Murray, retaining salary, and getting nothing back in return.
If the Leafs are moving Murray to ANYONE, they are retaining and adding picks.
I think if they rebuild then they'd have to dump Markstrom. No one is paying for himThat makes no sense.
If the Flames rebuild, they aren't taking on Matt Murray, retaining salary, and getting nothing back in return.
If the Leafs are moving Murray to ANYONE, they are retaining and adding picks.
Markstrom is not a cap dump.I think if they rebuild then they'd have to dump Markstrom. No one is paying for him
They are getting the legit starter they wanted for the last 10 years. They are trading someone who can't stay healthy who they regret signing.Not when the Leafs are taking on a more expensive goalie with more term.
Markstrom was one of the worst starters in the league last year, this isn't 21/22. The Flames do rebuild when forced like when the Iggy era finally ended. If Lindholm wants out and they can't find a trade that brings in a top 6 center then they might actually be smart about asset management. If they do go for it they will have to go all in next season and pray for a rebound from Huberdeau and Markstrom. The Flames cannot afford to re-sign all of their UFAs over the next two seasons and need to fill a #1 center, two top six forwards, a top pair dman, and a second pair dman with current players or other UFAs.Markstrom is not a cap dump.
He is one of the best goalies in the league coming off a Vezina runner up.
They aren't rebuilding. They don't rebuild.
They are getting the legit starter they wanted for the last 10 years. They are trading someone who can't stay healthy who they regret signing.
The Leafs retain and add. It's not smart to think otherwise.
10 years since salary retention was instituted. Flames actually did it once though - they retained 50% of Rittich's salary in the trade deadline deal that sent him to the Leafs in 2021.
Can't say I'm as optimistic about the CSEC as you though. They seem like slow learners. But in this case, I hope they do institute a ban on trading with the Leafs regardless since the Flames never seem to win those anyway.
Doesn’t Muzzin’s cap hit have to be on the roster on the first day of the season?Muzzin on LTIR. Murray isn’t coming back (buyout is 600k)
They will have about 18-20 million depending on retention
For Murray
With
Xxxx. Matthews. Marner
Knies. Tavares. Nylander
Jarnkrok. Xxxxx. Lafferty
Xxxxx. Xxxxxxx. Xxxxxxx
Rielly. Brodie
McCabe lilly
Gio. Timmins
Xxxx
Woll
Plenty of space probably will want to upgrade 1 d (4-5 million) Sammy 3-4 million. 4th line 3 million. And now you have about 8 million for a winter and a 3c
Eh, not really. After the Flyers signed Weber to an offersheet, the Preds ownership allegedly blocked a deal or two between the two teams in the years afterwards.There will be no ban that's ridiculous
Eh, not really. After the Flyers signed Weber to an offersheet, the Preds ownership allegedly blocked a deal or two between the two teams in the years afterwards.
Did Nashville ownership block a trade with Philadelphia?
Throughout the summer of 2014, rumors were swirling about Vincent Lecavalier becoming a Predator. It turns out we weren’t aware just how close those rumors were to coming into fruition…www.ontheforecheck.com
Yes, but the Leafs would be allowed to exceed the cap by his cahphit. And as a result, they are unable to "bank" capspace over the course of the season.Doesn’t Muzzin’s cap hit have to be on the roster on the first day of the season?
Yeah you're reading too much into that. There could be legitimate reasons why Treliving was initially blocked from having conversations with other teams.Murray Edwards is a remarkably small & petty man with a poor hockey mind. The most recent example of that can be seen in him blocking Treliving from interviewing around the league because the latter refused to re-sign. Yes, that's right; despite Treliving's horrid asset management over the years, Edwards was desperate to have him stay.
So basically, if/when Treliving becomes the Leafs GM, good chance Edwards straight up blocks Conroy from trading with the Leafs. At least for a few years.
"You want our ageing cap dumps? Well, **** you buddy. Go sign your own."
Markstrom is not a cap dump.
He is one of the best goalies in the league coming off a Vezina runner up.
They aren't rebuilding. They don't rebuild.
They are getting the legit starter they wanted for the last 10 years. They are trading someone who can't stay healthy who they regret signing.
The Leafs retain and add. It's not smart to think otherwise.
Such as?Yeah you're reading too much into that. There could be legitimate reasons why Treliving was initially blocked from having conversations with other teams.