FooteBahl
Took a big shitz for Nemec
Nice!Devils picks:
#2
#37
#69
#101
#109
#125
#140
#165
#197
If there are any players that in any way, shape or form have a name resembling a sex act, they must be drafted!
Nice!Devils picks:
#2
#37
#69
#101
#109
#125
#140
#165
#197
I didnt realize later tounds picks are determined before the playoffs endDevils picks:
#2
#37
#69
#101
#109
#125
#140
#165
#197
Perhaps not an act, but Jack Hughes is a name that oozes pure sex.Nice!
If there are any players that in any way, shape or form have a name resembling a sex act, they must be drafted!
When Shero was in charge, the Devils drafted sleepers all the time. Hopefully, Fitzgerald's weakness in this respect will be improved for the 2022 draft.I didnt realize later tounds picks are determined before the playoffs end
I guess there must not be any stipulations on ours. Right around pick 100 is where I usually expect a sleeper
I'd say that the likely draft slot for The Other Jack Hughes is in the 25-40 range, which would put the odds on the Devils missing out on him. Hughes is a high-compete, two-way middle 6 center-type with high end playmaking ability. This is a very coveted type of player come draft day.@StevenToddIves (or anyone who closely follows these guys) On a serious note, and I'm aware it's not currently a position of great need and that it would be odd/funny to have another one, but do you see a scenario where Mr. Hughes falls to 37? You're writeup about him seems pretty positive.
If not, in your view could it be worth it to package say Ty Smith and the 2nd to move up 5-7 spots if he's still on the board, or will there likely be enough talent left that the Devils shouldn't entertain the idea?
If both Beck and Perevalov fall to 37 which would you be more likely to favor it it was your choice?I'd say that the likely draft slot for The Other Jack Hughes is in the 25-40 range, which would put the odds on the Devils missing out on him. Hughes is a high-compete, two-way middle 6 center-type with high end playmaking ability. This is a very coveted type of player come draft day.
I'm not falling in love with a singular prospect in the 25-40 range, unless it's a player who fills a specific desperate need like RD Tristan Luneau. I'm hoping to use that pick on a DeBrincat/Faber-type guy who falls for a specific and stupid reason. In this particular draft, the Russian Factor could be more pronounced than usual, causing a clear first-round talent to fall, like Perevalov or Trikozov or even Miroshnichenko. A couple of other high end prospects could fall to #37 for dumb reasons, like Filip Mesar or Owen Beck.
I agree with you wholeheartedly that the Devils also have a specific need for a middle-six center to slot in the future behind Hughes and Hischier. Fortunately, this draft has several candidates who could potentially be available at #37 -- not just The Other Jack Hughes and Owen Beck, but also Nathan Gaucher, Noah Ostlund, Luca Del Bel Belluz and Matyas Sapovaliv.
There should be some good center prospects available in the 3rd round and later -- the guy I've spotlighted the most has been over-aged Hamilton pivot Logan Morrison. But again, there will be more players, maybe not quite to Morrison's level but with clear ability to play an NHL bottom 6 C role: Alex Kaskimaki, Bryce McConnell-Barker, Paul Ludwinski, Daniil Bourosh, Brennan Ali, Pano Fimis, Topi Ronni, Fraser Minten, Liam Arnsby. I'd say Servac Petrovsky has top 6 upside, but I'm not sure if he projects more to center or wing at this point, because he's one of the youngest players available for the 2022 draft.
You can find write-ups for all of these kids I've mentioned on the Draft Prospects and Draft Prospects II threads, although we should probably find a better way to organize all my draft write-ups.
I'd say that the likely draft slot for The Other Jack Hughes is in the 25-40 range, which would put the odds on the Devils missing out on him. Hughes is a high-compete, two-way middle 6 center-type with high end playmaking ability. This is a very coveted type of player come draft day.
I'm not falling in love with a singular prospect in the 25-40 range, unless it's a player who fills a specific desperate need like RD Tristan Luneau. I'm hoping to use that pick on a DeBrincat/Faber-type guy who falls for a specific and stupid reason. In this particular draft, the Russian Factor could be more pronounced than usual, causing a clear first-round talent to fall, like Perevalov or Trikozov or even Miroshnichenko. A couple of other high end prospects could fall to #37 for dumb reasons, like Filip Mesar or Owen Beck.
I agree with you wholeheartedly that the Devils also have a specific need for a middle-six center to slot in the future behind Hughes and Hischier. Fortunately, this draft has several candidates who could potentially be available at #37 -- not just The Other Jack Hughes and Owen Beck, but also Nathan Gaucher, Noah Ostlund, Luca Del Bel Belluz and Matyas Sapovaliv.
There should be some good center prospects available in the 3rd round and later -- the guy I've spotlighted the most has been over-aged Hamilton pivot Logan Morrison. But again, there will be more players, maybe not quite to Morrison's level but with clear ability to play an NHL bottom 6 C role: Alex Kaskimaki, Bryce McConnell-Barker, Paul Ludwinski, Daniil Bourosh, Brennan Ali, Pano Fimis, Topi Ronni, Fraser Minten, Liam Arnsby. I'd say Servac Petrovsky has top 6 upside, but I'm not sure if he projects more to center or wing at this point, because he's one of the youngest players available for the 2022 draft.
You can find write-ups for all of these kids I've mentioned on the Draft Prospects and Draft Prospects II threads, although we should probably find a better way to organize all my draft write-ups.
Oooh, that's a toughie. Perevalov is the higher-end prospect, but Beck is perfect two-way, character center to slot for the foreseeable future behind Jack & Nico.If both Beck and Perevalov fall to 37 which would you be more likely to favor it it was your choice?
Nice!
If there are any players that in any way, shape or form have a name resembling a sex act, they must be drafted!
I think it's looking pretty good for Slafkovsky at #2, so you're ok there unless Montreal surprises a lot of people.I know at the 69th pick might be a bit early to draft a Goalie but I hope we manage to get one of the two better goalie prospects and I don't think they will survive till our 101th pick.
So far my Fantasy draft is
2. Slaf
36. Beck/RD/Falling Russian player
69. Goalie
101. Barabosha
Here ya go, guys...
Here ya go, guys...
No Arnotts available... *sigh*A Sykora and an Elias?
Warren won't last that long, but Fisher and Mastrodomenico might.Three RD in the fourth round sounds good
Here ya go, guys...
So, just spitballing here, where do you think Dumais would be good value if the Devils select him? 140? 165? 197?? lol.Devils picks:
#2
#37
#69
#101
#109
#125
#140
#165
#197
Dumbass?So, just spitballing here, where do you think Dumais would be good value if the Devils select him? 140? 165? 197?? lol.
2) Slafkovsky -- very good oddsNow how realistic do you think those picks are?
Do you think there is a chance of us having a draft like that or do you find the draft sim player ranking to be off?
Would be nice to have another Nico on the team ^.^
In a vacuum, I'd be fine with Dumais in the 4th round on the elite passing and high-end puck skills alone.So, just spitballing here, where do you think Dumais would be good value if the Devils select him? 140? 165? 197?? lol.
If he were a Devil, would that be his nickname like we Call bratt...Bratter or some nonsense?Dumbass?
This name is already "TM" for Toronto GM.Dumbass?
Slafkovsky, Sykora, Eliaš .... Yeah, draft them allA Sykora and an Elias?