Boston Bruins IV-Rumors, Trade Proposals, Speculation, etc.. (rumors must have recognized source/link)

Status
Not open for further replies.

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,771
19,261
Connecticut
Ok, what's the DeBrusk deal for Rakell whose only consistency the last few years has been his decline in play? We better be getting a second-rounder or protected prospect.

Regular Season Comparison
ScoringGoalsPer GamePoint SharesAdjusted
PlayerTmPosFromToActiveGPGAPTS+/-PIMEVPPSHGWSS%TOIGAPTSSOPSDPSPSGAPTS
Jake DebruskBOSLW20172021421463601231151451801448513.033000.290.280.572.279.64.414.07072142
Rickard RakellANARW/C201220219466130160290-910010228026114611.378330.280.340.622.4623.29.132.3145192337
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Playoffs Comparison
ScoringGoalsPer Game
PlayerTmPosFromToActiveGPGAPTS+/-PIMEVPPSHGWSS%TOIGAPTSS
Jake DebruskBOSLW20172020349149230201040310813.07590.290.180.472.20
Rickard RakellANAC/RW20132018546118191292019411.76960.240.170.412.04
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Rakell has the better career only because he has over twice the games played as Jake.
DeBrusk is the younger player and slightly better overall stats.

Unless Anaheim adds something interesting we don't win a 1v1 trade.

Look at who Rakell has been playing with. Again his two most common linemates since 2017 are Ryan Getzlaf (talk about declining) and Adam Henrique (who just cleared waivers). Since 2017 at 5v5:

upload_2021-2-24_10-29-49.png
 

AngryMilkcrates

End of an Era
Jun 4, 2016
17,498
28,227
Look at who Rakell has been playing with. Again his two most common linemates since 2017 are Ryan Getzlaf (talk about declining) and Adam Henrique (who just cleared waivers). Since 2017 at 5v5:

View attachment 399968

This is true.
But we are not putting him with Marchand and Pastrnak.
He will be with Krejci and Ritchie most likely. Not sure that is gonna spark some success there.

You kinda have to keep Pasta on the top line so it is still a threat and not just shut down by the other teams best defensive line. Rakell would be Horton-esque but I would ask who plays on the other wing with Krejci.
 

Oates2Neely

Registered User
Jan 19, 2010
19,873
14,748
Massachusetts
Right....

but Bobby Stevenson. aka Ryan is 33, and knowing his past history, Oates, as we do... back to his days as a Ducks prospect at 21 in a city like Portland back in the mid 2000s, doesn't really move the needle to what Boston is trying to become up front.
While I don’t disagree with your notion that Sweeney should set his target bigger, I wouldn’t scoff at a Ryan addition. While he’s lost a step or three, he still has a lethal shot/ quick release. And is a smart veteran player who puts himself in scoring lanes in the offensive zone.

I guess the question is do you prefer Bobby Ryan over Bjork or Kase in the playoffs?
 

Dr Hook

It’s Called Ruins
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2005
14,559
22,006
Tyler, TX
While I don’t disagree with your notion that Sweeney should set his target bigger, I wouldn’t scoff at a Ryan addition. While he’s lost a step or three, he still has a lethal shot/ quick release. And is a smart veteran player who puts himself in scoring lanes in the offensive zone.

I guess the question is do you prefer Bobby Ryan over Bjork or Kase in the playoffs?

I want Lee Stempniak.
 

CHRDANHUTCH

Registered User
Mar 4, 2002
38,798
5,011
Auburn, Maine
While I don’t disagree with your notion that Sweeney should set his target bigger, I wouldn’t scoff at a Ryan addition. While he’s lost a step or three, he still has a lethal shot/ quick release. And is a smart veteran player who puts himself in scoring lanes in the offensive zone.

I guess the question is do you prefer Bobby Ryan over Bjork or Kase in the playoffs?
I'm just saying had Boston, not Anaheim, developed Ryan.... drafted or otherwise.... we don't have the prospect pool to add a rental this year.... knowing you then have to protect said rental over someone you don't want to leave exposed as we've been discussing here.

knowing Ryan, and his history, as Portland fans do, because we have had the Ducks here as an affiliate, and how Bob Murray handled those moves then... and yes, that includes Getzlaf.

it has nothing to do with Bjork or Kase....
 

ON3M4N

Ignores/60 = Elite
Dec 13, 2015
13,771
19,261
Connecticut
This is true.
But we are not putting him with Marchand and Pastrnak.
He will be with Krejci and Ritchie most likely. Not sure that is gonna spark some success there.

You kinda have to keep Pasta on the top line so it is still a threat and not just shut down by the other teams best defensive line. Rakell would be Horton-esque but I would ask who plays on the other wing with Krejci.

The nice thing with Rakell is he can lineup on either side of wing. I wouldn't mind running him out with Krejci and Ritchie. If that doesn't fit, move Smith up and let Rakell play w/ Coyle and Frederic or Coyle and Bjork. Hell move Bjork to 2RW with Krejci/Ritchie and then move Rakell to LW and roll Rakell-Coyle-Smith if you want.
 

Riley 88

Registered User
Jan 24, 2020
821
750
so lemme get this straight... a guy who is basically a lock for 25-30 goals does nothing for you, but a guy who has never scored 20 is the guy you want?

maybe if you keep saying it you'll be right eventually
Yes...Not even close. I want the guy 6 foot 2 Two hundred pound who hits everything in sight, plays hard on the walls....Crashes the net and causes turnovers with his speed and tenacity.....And can score goals also......I want a guy who an handle the playoff grind.....You can have Palimieri the shrimpy type that disappears come playoff time and is not going to be a physical up and down winger and is also a FA.....

We need to build for the Playoffs....You can keep the shrimpy non physical Palmieri.....I will take Wood and it is not even a question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Mick Riddleton

May these gates never be closed
Apr 24, 2017
14,435
15,744
I have a feeling they will not make any moves till after Seattle takes who they want. This is the cheaper - lets see what the kids can do year. This helps them avoid exposing any big name trades or a younger guy they would rather keep.

The 1.5 million from Backes is out of the way next year. If they resign Krech and Rask, perhaps they get them cheaper, maybe down to 6 million each range. Maybe they replace Kuraly with Stud but they need to sign Carlo. The Seattle Kraken Expansion Draft is officially set for July 21, 2021 as per Bob Mac.

If the kids play well enough this also raises the value of them. Before this year most were question marks. It only helps the organization for leverage.
 

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
9,237
9,909
Moncton NB
I could see a few deals the B's make, either they get Ekholm from NSH or like someone mentioned Gio and Bennett from CGY, get one of Palmieri or Rakell whoever is cheaper to acquire and then one more deal, I would like is Tomas Hertl, would be a great fit, he can play LW with Krejci and can also play centre if/when needed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

bbfan419

Registered User
Jul 3, 2006
9,237
9,909
Moncton NB
The nice thing with Rakell is he can lineup on either side of wing. I wouldn't mind running him out with Krejci and Ritchie. If that doesn't fit, move Smith up and let Rakell play w/ Coyle and Frederic or Coyle and Bjork. Hell move Bjork to 2RW with Krejci/Ritchie and then move Rakell to LW and roll Rakell-Coyle-Smith if you want.
Love getting players that can play multiple positions, it gives the team a lot of different options on how to set their lines and provides depth if needed.
 

veganbruin

Registered User
Sep 20, 2013
3,301
3,568
Boston, MA
Looks like I got the Rakell wheels turning. I don’t think he would make us better if we give up DeBrusk in that deal. But everyone’s making me think about Seattle so that makes some sense.
 

RussellmaniaKW

Registered User
Sep 15, 2004
19,729
21,853
Yes...Not even close. I want the guy 6 foot 2 Two hundred pound who hits everything in sight, plays hard on the walls....Crashes the net and causes turnovers with his speed and tenacity.....And can score goals also......I want a guy who an handle the playoff grind.....You can have Palimieri the shrimpy type that disappears come playoff time and is not going to be a physical up and down winger and is also a FA.....

We need to build for the Playoffs....You can keep the shrimpy non physical Palmieri.....I will take Wood and it is not even a question.
Miles Wood has zero nhl playoff points
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Lather

MattFromFranklin

Fire Sweeney and Neely
Jun 19, 2012
4,189
3,164
Franklin, MA
So we give up a 1st and Beecher to dump Kase and expose Rakell to Seattle? If we protect Rakell then they take DeBrusk.
Swapping out one inconsistent forward (DeBrusk) for another (Rakell) is not ideal. Neither are players who will be key pieces of a cup winning team. If DeBrusk is going to be dealt, I'd rather deal him for Palmieri. I would expect Sweeney to have an idea if Palmieri would sign an extension.
 

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,380
New England
Yes...Not even close. I want the guy 6 foot 2 Two hundred pound who hits everything in sight, plays hard on the walls....Crashes the net and causes turnovers with his speed and tenacity.....And can score goals also......I want a guy who an handle the playoff grind.....You can have Palimieri the shrimpy type that disappears come playoff time and is not going to be a physical up and down winger and is also a FA.....

We need to build for the Playoffs....You can keep the shrimpy non physical Palmieri.....I will take Wood and it is not even a question.

To the bolded, Miles Wood has 7 hits in 14 games played. That’s literally .5 hits/Gm. Not even a full hit a game. Now last year he had 102 hits in 68 games. That’s 1.5 Hits/Gm. Overall career, he has 350 hits in 282 games. That’s 1.2 Hits/game. I like Wood and would take him easily on this Bruins team but I don’t know where you’re getting this “he hits everything in sight” from. He could do it. He has the size, speed and makeup for it but he doesn’t. Unless the stat counters are not recording his hits.

Since your argument is that Palmieri is not a tough or a hitter, he has 12 more hits than Wood this year, despite playing in one less game. Career wise, Palmieri has 538 hits in 376 games. That’s about 1.4 hits per game. More than Wood averages.

Come playoffs, sample size is tiny for Wood at 5 GP but he has 4 hits in the postseason. Palmieri has 68 in 33 games: 2 Hits/Gm which shows he picks up the physicality come playoffs. He averages 0.39 PPG in the postseason. Wood is pointless thus far.

Both players play with an edge, aren’t afraid to get gritty and muck it up if need be. You’ll get the big hit that you won’t get from Palmieri. That’s where they differ. Wood also the clear advantage in fighting but that’s not something you want come playoffs.
 
Last edited:

BruinsFanSince94

The Perfect Fan ™
Sep 28, 2017
32,709
43,380
New England
He might have. Or Danton Heinen is a good player that we should have kept?

Heinen proved to be a dime a dozen JAG here in Boston. We won that deal, easily.

Heinen, since entering the league, has watched his production continue a steady trend downward; his best year being a rookie season.

Ritchie, for the most part, has actually had an upwards in production. This year having an explosion. Even if this isn’t what he will be for the foreseeable future (I have my doubts he’ll continue this beyond this season) he has proven to be a good 3rd line role player which is what Heinen has only shown in spurts.
 

yazmybaby

Registered User
Sep 13, 2015
2,674
2,280
Brampton ON, Canada
I didn't even realize Dustin Brown was still in the league, let alone a contributer.
I watched Brown play a few games this year.
He was a step faster, he must have lost a bit of weight and played great.
He must be like a fine wine, getting better with age.
For the right price, I think he helps our team ( 3rd -4th rd pick?)
His contract may make him hard to move for LA?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad