Joe Hallenback
Moderator
- Mar 4, 2005
- 15,616
- 22,457
I detest getting pushed around in front of net and I find it is happening a lot more this year. A Buff back would help that aspect a lot.
Buff back helps in alot of ways , toughness , passing , hockey IQ , PP , PK and mojo . Buff must make the Jets play a little tougher knowing Big Buff is there .I detest getting pushed around in front of net and I find it is happening a lot more this year. A Buff back would help that aspect a lot.
PB'It's so weird, you'd think benching Heinola would have been the key to winning
Need a tender change too to make that workMaybe we’re doing that lose until Xmas, change our coach, win the Stanley cup thing the Blues did last year
Ya it definitely needs to get more aggressive and it needs Little and Buff .PK lost that game for us. It sits currently at 60%, second worst in the NHL.
Just like the Jets these just need a little duct tape and they are good to go .Ladies and gentlemen, your 2019-2020 Winnipeg Jets...
Blues season changed immediately after firing their coach, didn’t it? You’re correct though, their D was solid to begin with.I wish people wouldn't compare the two teams. The Blues defenseman roster >> Jets defenseman roster. There is no hope for a similar turnaround for the Jets, unless Chevy somehow rebuilds the defense mid season.... which I don't think is wise or even possible.
Blues season changed immediately after firing their coach, didn’t it? You’re correct though, their D was solid to begin with.
I agree he needs to coach -
And your points makes sense - but IDK if they can get there before it's too late.
The talent is there but they are not defensively talented - that will be the challenge.
Transitioning will help - but there still needs to be an over all defensive mind set that is lacking.
It all starts in your own end - if you can't get possession and you don't necessarily have the skill set to drive that transition game, you'll struggle with this until you learn and action that type of game.
The vets are there for one reason only IMO - Mo can't get everyone up to speed as quickly as needed so he is falling back on vets to hold down the fort until we can execute. The problem, as you've pointed out, is the skill level with the vet pool - it's not there.
I honestly don't think the answer will be as easy as pointing out what needs to be done (ie; transition, puck movement) - it's going to involve a learning curve in a situation where there is no time for a learning curve. This situation with our D core is not a typical challenge - we lost most of our core and now we're trying to not only replace them, but change the game plan / strategy in a hurry.
So tonight was the first "official" non sellout ever. I would guess there has been more, but first time
Since the return the posted attendance is below a sellout anyways.
A roster with below par NHL talent will make any "system" look bad regardless of who is behind the bench. I don't know why the "Jets have too much talent to be this bad" thing continues to persist. Pionk, Dahlstrom and Kulikov were 3 of 4 d-men with the most icetime on the Jets tonight.
That is a guy who Rangers (a lottery team) fans ran out of town.
A guy who was waived by a team that was a bottom-3 defensive team in the league.
And a guy who almost everyone literally wanted to be bought out this summer.
make up 3/4th of our top-4 and there really aren't much better options available right now in the system.
I find it hard to blame the coach or the "system" given those are the options. I am just disappointed that after 6 years of suckage, our window was only open for 2 seasons (really they only looked like a contender for 1.5 seasons, not many here were convinced that they had what it took to make a deep run after watching them play till February).
A couple thoughts:
Coyotes playing like the Jets did in 17-18, no one was getting in to dangerous areas at 5 on 5.
Dahlstrom-Pionk have been quietly very effective, I know xG is wonky right now but they're ahead there and well ahead in shot share. It would be weird for it to stick when the group is healthy but they've done pretty well so far.
Poolman can't hang against top competition and that's hurting things a lot right now, but if Buff does come back I'm feeling more optimistic that they might be able to make 3 decent pairings. Would they actually do it is another question but I think the potential is there.
Team looks mediocre right now and the numbers / record support that. Would be nice for something to happen to shake things up a little, we're already 1/10 into the season.
This is not a good thing , not one bit . From someone that went through losing the Jets once , we don't want any empty seats . Some might have been missing because they have no power from the storm still and had higher priorities . Not saying you think it's good , just using you as a reference to post from .There were many empty seats. Almost entire rows empty.
Because they also have above average goaltending and elite forward talent.
So yes, they have too much talent to be as bad as people are claiming.
But where they currently are in the standards -- "real" .500 after 8 games under adverse conditions -- is almost exactly how "much talent they have", all in all; almost exactly on the course that the experts, the math models and the sports books nearly unanimously charted out for them before the season started.
do you think chevy is surprised. losing myers trouba and chiarot in july then doing nothing to replace them. is he surprised or did he expect this. my guess is he is surprised. I mean if he expected this he would have found a way to improve the defence with some trades from july to October.agreed
Not sure how anyone here can be surprised by what they’re seeing so far........the roller coaster is just starting so people better buckle up.
blues were actually quite solid defensively in 2018 (oct 2018-dec 31 2018), ranking top 10 in the league in limiting CA, SA and xGA (per 60) at 5v5. the problem was the team was sporting a 892 SV%. Berube impact helped, but i think ultimately getting quality goaltending through 2019 factored in with their already stout defense made a significant impact.Blues season changed immediately after firing their coach, didn’t it? You’re correct though, their D was solid to begin with.
I have to chuckle to myself at all the vitriol Myers and Chariot get in these forums, when it's obvious that they're so much better than what took their place. Meanwhile, we knew we got (blanked) by the Trouba trade. Yeah, Pionk is quick, skates well and can move the puck... but he is also useless at defending the front of the net, which opposition teams are now using as a tactic.do you think chevy is surprised. losing myers trouba and chiarot in july then doing nothing to replace them. is he surprised or did he expect this. my guess is he is surprised. I mean if he expected this he would have found a way to improve the defence with some trades from july to October.
Losing Myers, Trouba and Chiarot freed up $17.5M in current-value cap space, $14M of which was used to sign Laine and Connor. Another $3M was used to sign Pionk, who is a perfectly adequate replacement for Myers. Beaulieu is a more than adequate replacement for Chiarot at <1/3 the cost. Did you have a better cap management plan?do you think chevy is surprised. losing myers trouba and chiarot in july then doing nothing to replace them. is he surprised or did he expect this. my guess is he is surprised. I mean if he expected this he would have found a way to improve the defence with some trades from july to October.
do you think chevy is surprised. losing myers trouba and chiarot in july then doing nothing to replace them. is he surprised or did he expect this. my guess is he is surprised. I mean if he expected this he would have found a way to improve the defence with some trades from july to October.
This is not a good thing , not one bit . From someone that went through losing the Jets once , we don't want any empty seats . Some might have been missing because they have no power from the storm still and had higher priorities . Not saying you think it's good , just using you as a reference to post from .