Empoleon8771
Registered User
But our discussion is about you saying you think he's a great coach and me not agreeing with that. Now you're saying that we need to see proof of this elsewhere first before we can conclude that. But that seems like a weird thing to say because that applied to Bylsma circa 2014 as well. If someone argued that Bylsma was a bad coach and needed to be fired in 2013 or 2014, you'd use the argument "he's actually a great coach until he proves otherwise" to counter that?
Put another way -- lets say he gets fired and lands a job with a middling team. Do you see that team becoming good under him? "Great" coaches can turn mediocre teams into teams that sneak into the playoffs or 8th seed types into #4 or #5 seeds. Do you see Sullivan doing that?
....yes? That's my point. He's a great coach until he proves otherwise. And yes, I would have said exactly that about Bylsma. It was time to move on because he was too comfortable and was too stubborn with his decisions, but I still thought he was a great coach that would do well elsewhere. It wasn't until he failed miserably in Buffalo until I realized he was actually a bad coach.
I don't see that as questionable logic whatsoever.