I edited the article linked in the first post of this thread in regards to position (and also nationality in the case of Siemens). My sources were Eliteprospects and HockeyDB. So in the case of Couturier, I'll post these links:
http://www.eliteprospects.com/player.php?player=32885&lang=en
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=115908
Is Sean actually a centre? I haven't seen him play, so I don't know.
Also, note the conflicting places of birth between these two sources. In my experience, HockeyDB has at times listed where someone grew up instead of where they were born. Does anyone know which source is correct in this case?
Rocco Grimaldi will be playing college hockey for North Dakota. He's not going to be a high draft pick because of his size, but I thought this would be a good place to spread the word because he is 2011 draft eligible.
Rocco Grimaldi will be playing college hockey for North Dakota. He's not going to be a high draft pick because of his size, but I thought this would be a good place to spread the word because he is 2011 draft eligible.
I'm really not the guy to ask, but I'd probably put him more in the Gerbe mold than the Schroeder or Kane mold. Where would Gerbe go in a redraft?If Grimaldi grows to 5'9''ish (same as Jordan Schroeder), can you see him as a potential first round pick?
Which one do you think has more offensive upside, Grimaldi or Schroeder?
This list is from wikipedia. Take it for what this is worth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_NHL_Entry_Draft
It's interesting to see a Swedish forward as #3. Many people are talking about Ryan Nugent-Hopkins as top 3 guy. But so far he doesn't seems to have impressed the scouts that much. Still no Gabriel Landeskog in the list.
Discuss.
I look at the list and there are some really good players absent. In no specific order: KKomarek
no Shayne McColgan yet??? He's my sleeper to go 1st overall next year.
McColgan is 5'8" at most - i thought the stats on the official sites would be just that "official"
I wish people would stop with the Canadian bias thing. ISS is not going to risk its reputation just so they can rank a Canadian number one.
McColgan is 5'8" at most - i thought the stats on the official sites would be just that "official"
If McColgan is 5'8, then RNH is only 125 pounds....
I have seen McColgan plenty of times, the kid is a legit 5'10...seen him in person as well and I am 6'2, I do not tower over him..
Not sure why McColgan takes the backseat to Nugent-Hopkins. Both are smallish yet equally sized players, yet Hopkins seems to be getting more buzz while putting up less numbers then Shane. I think McColgan is every bit as good as Hopkins if not better...If he can put up another 10 pounds to his frame by October, then I think the kid has a chance to simply dominate the WHL and dominate a top 5 spot.
It is all in his hands, but Shane McColgan is a name that some people just are missing out on currently. Kid has sick skills folks, best 16 year old CHL American since Mike Modano back in 88....
I have only had a limited viewing of both players and generally hate going from what others say but from everything that I have heard, the knock on McColgan is that he is a perimeter player and does not handle traffic all that well. R.N.H. on the other hand is a fearless player who will go anywhere and do anything to score goals.
Perhaps that is why the difference in opinions on the two players.
I have only had a limited viewing of both players and generally hate going from what others say but from everything that I have heard, the knock on McColgan is that he is a perimeter player and does not handle traffic all that well. R.N.H. on the other hand is a fearless player who will go anywhere and do anything to score goals.
Perhaps that is why the difference in opinions on the two players.