Real Smart Sens Fan
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2014
- 4,760
- 4
Ottawa Receives:
CALVIN DE HAAN, D 1,966,667 1 yrs
JOSH BAILEY 3,300,000 2 yrs
+
2017 5th
+
1,572,500 salary retained
Islanders Receives:
MICHAEL KOSTKA 800,000 1 yrs
CURTIS LAZAR 894,167 1 yrs
+
2017 3rd
As a sens fan I'd do this.
Why? Value aside (which is CLEARLY better than the other proposals in this thread), we don't need a D right now. Our top 4 is set.
Any chance Ottawa might want to get rid of Ryan(especially after Hoffman's arbitration case)?
Grabovski(cap dump), 1st and Dal Colle
I could be wrong on this one but Ottawa owner might actually like Grabovski who is a candidate to be injured like half the season(thus insurance covering his salary)
Da Haan is better and more valuable than Lazar. Thats why. Can turn around and trade Da Haan or Methot at the deadline for another piece because we'll lose one in the expansion draft.
What? No. You keep both of them BECAUSE you're going to lose one.
What makes more sense? Trade one, lose the other to expansion and only have 3 top 4 D + whatever you get in the trade, or lose one and still have 4 top 4?
A team that comes out of the expansion with 4 top 4 D is going to be in a lot better shape than those that don't.
If we got Mark Stone I'd do backflips. He's perfect for Tavares.
Three way trade:
To EDM: Ceci, Kulemin
To NYI: RNH
To Ottawa: De Haan
Edmonton gets another right handed D and loses Nuge in favor of McDavid and Draisaitl, they have to take on Kulemin's contract to balance salaries.
New York loses De Haan who they would of lost to expansion anyways, and gain RNH to play second line center which is a huge need for them.
Ottawa loses Ceci and gains a better defenceman De Haan (also local), this allows Methot to move to the second pairing and Phaneuf to move to his more comfortable right side.
De Haan - Karlsson
Methot - Phaneuf
One reason I like this trade is that every team gains a player that is much more important for their success compared to the one they gave up.
Ottawa wouldn't do that for Stone alone.
Nelson is nice but he would would be on our 2nd/3rd line so why downgrade ?
Bailey is redundant in Ottawa if we wanted to pay a 3rd/4th liner that much we would have kept Chiasson.
Only player that Ottawa would trade Stone for from the Isles is Tavares seeing as he is the only player there better than him.
^^^^And yet i would rather have Stone than Ladd right now.
Long term of course...if you were entering a playoff tournament right now, who do you take Stone or Ladd?
Stone
Thats crazy. If you think that RIGHT NOW, not 2-3 years from now, that Stone is a better goal scorer, all around player, leader and clutch performer than Ladd at THIS MOMENT, I dont know what to tell you.