Speculation: Is winning games and being first in the Atlantic an indication that we're a bad team?

leafs in five

Registered User
Feb 4, 2007
5,352
1,130
engelland
what I see is they play like they did in games 4-7 of the Boston series, flipping the puck out to centre all the time, icings, lots of chip and chase, dmen blocking lots of shots, really good goaltending (true even of samsonov in game 7). 2 recent goals against have been like a result of too many Leafs hauling ass to over-backcheck. I am not surprised that some offensive numbers are kind of lagging, or that our top scorer can't compete with Colorado's etc. I really like the possibility of Minten contributing in the playoffs, and Domi can obviously bring it then too we've seen it. I don't want to trade for Kadri at all
 

Fogelhund

Registered User
Sep 15, 2007
23,735
28,305
In my opinion, this is a good team, but not yet good enough. We've won plenty of regular season games over the years, so the expectation is for more. We expect that a team with higher aspirations should have a more consistent effort. I appreciate that it's a long season, but we continue to show some signs that are reminders of why we've failed in the past. A lack of effort when it counts, challenges with secondary scoring. We see that this team can be a dominant team at times, but it's just not consistent. A little more consistency with that level of play would probably satisfy many, at least for the regular season... and probably be a predictor of a higher degree of playoff success..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sypher04 and weems

conFABulator

Registered User
Apr 11, 2021
1,836
1,619
It’ll likely boil down to how effective Domi, McMann and Pacioretty are in the playoffs, and whether they can carry the team through a round or two if the goaltending can do their part and steal a couple of games.
I assume you list those three because they represent depth scoring beyond our core four. I agree, bit would add Knies to the top of that list...and then Robertson to the hopeful list, unless he is scratched in place of a TDL pick-up
 

rojac

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2007
13,362
3,202
Waterloo, ON
I for one have no complaints about their current position in the standings....except perhaps that we are currently trending towards playing Boston or Tampa again. Such is (Bettman) life.

However, their play is December has been...concerning. Confidence in their ability to maintain this point pace is not high should they continue to play like this.

I do acknowledge that I am hard on the team (in my defense, the last near-decade of playoff performances has conditioned me).

That said, I don't think the "take the two points and run" mentality is supposed to apply to every win :laugh:
There are currently 7 teams (including TB and BOS) within 3 points of the WC1 spot so it seems a bit premature to be claiming beliefs are trending towards playing anybody in the playoffs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224
Sep 18, 2009
9,949
5,160
There are currently 7 teams (including TB and BOS) within 3 points of the WC1 spot so it seems a bit premature to be claiming beliefs are trending towards playing anybody in the playoffs.
I prefer the 1 vs 8 style playoff format old school legit not bottman crap he is doing now
 

rojac

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 5, 2007
13,362
3,202
Waterloo, ON
I prefer the 1 vs 8 style playoff format old school legit not bottman crap he is doing now
So, just to clarify, do you want the version of 1 vs. 8 that the league used to use where Division leaders get the top seeds or do you want a pure 1-8 ranking of teams?

Using the first system, the Leafs would currently be the #2 seed and would play the #8 seed which is Boston.

Using the second system, the Leafs would currently the #4 seed and would play the #5 seed which is Florida.

This is based on the point percentage standings as of the morning of Dec. 17, 2024.,

Incidentally, if you just use points, the first system still put the Leafs in the #2 seed where they would play the #7 seed, Tampa Bay. While the second system would put the Leafs in the #3 seed where they play #6, Boston.
 
Last edited:

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,571
16,257
Winning isn't bad. Being 1st in the Atlantic isn't bad. But we also should acknowledge that we're 1st in the Atlantic because the Atlantic division fell off, we're winning less than 3 of the past 4 years, and we're experiencing a concerning decline in our underlying play outside of goaltending.
 

Nineteen67

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Dec 12, 2017
25,303
11,928
I assume you list those three because they represent depth scoring beyond our core four. I agree, bit would add Knies to the top of that list...and then Robertson to the hopeful list, unless he is scratched in place of a TDL pick-up
I don’t expect much from the higher paid players and hope they don’t get in the way.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,571
16,257
The mythological 60 min game is what it seems people keep hoping for.
All games have ebbs and flows and momentum swings. Especially when you have 2 good teams playing. Even now contrary to most views, the league has achieved parity pretty much and every game you have to work.
For anyone thinking any team is going out and dominating for 60 mis night in, night out is kind of silly.
For the life of me I can't figure out why this market equates losing with players not caring, or being disinterested. With the rare expeption, winning 60% of all your games is a great season. Then prepare to try and win 16 games in the post season.
You are correct. They are trying to play a brand that has a higher chance of winning in the playoffs, taking care of your defensive responsibilities first will lead to the Leafs having fewer chances to score. Berube doesn't want to win 5-4 every night.
You're right about everything except the idea that this style of play has a higher chance of winning in the playoffs.
 

Leafidelity

Existentially Drifting
Apr 6, 2008
38,290
8,712
Downtown Canada
You're right about everything except the idea that this style of play has a higher chance of winning in the playoffs.

This is the playoff style of play Keefe has suddenly dropped on the team by like game 2-3 for the past years. I feel a lot better seeing them apply it during the season than suddenly pretending to be something they're not.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,571
16,257
This is the playoff style of play Keefe has suddenly dropped on the team by like game 2-3 for the past years. I feel a lot better seeing them apply it during the season than suddenly pretending to be something they're not
A lot of people seem to have no idea what systems we've run. Pretending to be something we're not and don't need to be is what we're currently doing.
 

Evilhomer

Registered User
Oct 10, 2019
5,641
5,543
Winning isn't bad. Being 1st in the Atlantic isn't bad. But we also should acknowledge that we're 1st in the Atlantic because the Atlantic division fell off, we're winning less than 3 of the past 4 years, and we're experiencing a concerning decline in our underlying play outside of goaltending.
They are certainly benefiting from the division not being what it was the past few years. Ironically, they may end up meeting the same teams they always do in the first round anyway as it's likely that one or maybe even both of Boston and Tampa (if Ottawa really does finally emerge this season) will be in a wild card spot.
 

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,319
24,792
All summer: The only thing that matters is the playoffs. Regular season means nothing

Lose a game in December: sky is definitely falling
The sky's definitely not falling. The teams' been OK, just OK. 1st in a weak division and an unimpressive goal differential of +9 but whatever. It's 82 games of practice before the real season so as long as they bring it in April I'll be happy.

We've had 8 consecutive seasons of sub .500 hockey in the playoffs which is probably an all-time NHL record. My biggest concern is despite a new coach, a new and improved system and much better goaltending, it's the same old core that seems to lack leadership and character. As long as it's the same 4 forwards taking up half the cap, how realistic is it that things will suddenly be different this year? We'll see what happens in the playoffs but my best guess at this point is that we will win a round, not impossible that we will even win another round and that will largely be due to goalies stealing a game or two along the way. Hard to see anything more than that but we can hope.
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,771
11,620
The Atlantic isn’t really weak when compared against other divisions. The Metro especially looks very similar to the Atlantic. The West have a few more competitive teams but their bottom feeders are a tier of their own

We'll see what happens in the playoffs but my best guess at this point is that we will win a round, not impossible that we will even win another round and that will largely be due to goalies stealing a game or two along the way. Hard to see anything more than that but we can hope.

This is kind of nonsensical imo.
it’s a rarity for a team to luck their way into the final 4. If the leafs goaltenders have to steal a game or two to help their team along that’s not a bad thing and not uncommon around the league. If you’re able to crack the final 4, there isn’t really any reason to think it couldn’t be your year.
 

Dekes For Days

Registered User
Sep 24, 2018
21,571
16,257
They're doing a pretty good job pretending. They should inform the rest of the Atlantic Division, and the 26 teams with less points that it's all a charade
Our underlying play this year hasn't actually been that great. And while we have the pieces to be a good team regardless, 8th place and on pace to finish worse than 3 of the last 4 years despite the 3rd best goaltending in the league isn't exactly a ringing endorsement of the system.
 

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,319
24,792
This is kind of nonsensical imo.
it’s a rarity for a team to luck their way into the final 4. If the leafs goaltenders have to steal a game or two to help their team along that’s not a bad thing and not uncommon around the league. If you’re able to crack the final 4, there isn’t really any reason to think it couldn’t be your year.
This post of yours is what's nonsensical.

If the goalies steal a game or two of course it's a good thing, I never said it wasn't, in fact I'm looking forward to it. I also never used the word luck so I have no idea what you're going on about.

As far as this "being our year", sure anything's possible. All I said was that for me it's hard to see winning more than 2 rounds and if you have problem with me having an opinion, well geez I don't know what to tell you. Call the cops maybe?
 

Sypher04

Registered User
Jan 20, 2011
12,771
11,620
This post of yours is what's nonsensical.

If the goalies steal a game or two of course it's a good thing, I never said it wasn't, in fact I'm looking forward to it. I also never used the word luck so I have no idea what you're going on about.

As far as this "being our year", sure anything's possible. All I said was that for me it's hard to see winning more than 2 rounds and if you have problem with me having an opinion, well geez I don't know what to tell you. Call the cops maybe?

Where did I say I had a problem with it? A little sensitive today, are we?

I just dont think when people make claims like I could see them winning 2 but no further, I have to wonder what they are even basing that on. It’s not at all uncommon for the first two rounds to be equally or moreso difficult than the 3rd round. It really all comes down to opponent.
 

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,319
24,792
Where did I say I had a problem with it? A little sensitive today, are we?
You said my post was nonsensical, that suggests you have a problem.
I just dont think when people make claims like I could see them winning 2 but no further, I have to wonder what they are even basing that on. It’s not at all uncommon for the first two rounds to be equally or moreso difficult than the 3rd round. It really all comes down to opponent.
I'm not claiming anything, I was stating an opinion. Millions of fans, millions of opinions. If your opinion is different from mine that's fine, seems like you're the one who's a little sensitive.

8 consecutive seasons of sub .500 hockey in the playoffs. A 1-8 record in playoff series during that time span. We're still spending half the cap on the same 4 forwards, 3 out of those 4 see huge dips in production in the playoffs. Winning 2 rounds would be more than they've won in the last 8 years combined, not sure why you take issue with me saying I have a hard time seeing them winning more than that.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad