Are they only for whining and ********* the same broken records all the time?What are these boards for?
Only to praise our collection of spoiled brats?
Are they only for whining and ********* the same broken records all the time?What are these boards for?
Only to praise our collection of spoiled brats?
Ferraro brought up again today on Overdrive about how the Leafs don't talk at all when they're on the bench. No words of encouragement, no "let's go boys," it's as quiet as a morgue (my words). It's like queuing for the bus in England; go for your shift, come back, shuffle down, rinse, repeat. Now I never played at a high level but our benches in hockey always had noise going on, especially during our playoffs, and I'd reckon everyone else that's played hockey would say the same. I don't know, maybe that's just how it is around the league now and we just focus on the Leafs too much, but at this point I'd even take a high pitched "somebody f***ing go" at this point.
That’s a strange post to respond to two months laterAre they only for whining and ********* the same broken records all the time?
Are they only for whining and ********* the same broken records all the time?
Ferraro brought up again today on Overdrive about how the Leafs don't talk at all when they're on the bench. No words of encouragement, no "let's go boys," it's as quiet as a morgue (my words). It's like queuing for the bus in England; go for your shift, come back, shuffle down, rinse, repeat. Now I never played at a high level but our benches in hockey always had noise going on, especially during our playoffs, and I'd reckon everyone else that's played hockey would say the same. I don't know, maybe that's just how it is around the league now and we just focus on the Leafs too much, but at this point I'd even take a high pitched "somebody f***ing go" at this point.
Ferraro brought up again today on Overdrive about how the Leafs don't talk at all when they're on the bench. No words of encouragement, no "let's go boys," it's as quiet as a morgue (my words). It's like queuing for the bus in England; go for your shift, come back, shuffle down, rinse, repeat. Now I never played at a high level but our benches in hockey always had noise going on, especially during our playoffs, and I'd reckon everyone else that's played hockey would say the same. I don't know, maybe that's just how it is around the league now and we just focus on the Leafs too much, but at this point I'd even take a high pitched "somebody f***ing go" at this point.
No energy, no fire, no emotion. They're just going through the motions.
The media won’t flat out say it but they have been hinting at it for weeks.The media wont say it but I will....
This team it appears, has locker room issues. Someone doesn't like someone. This jives with what Ferraro was saying. Its also supported by this team not giving a bleep for many games. They don't play for each other nor are they reliable for one another.
Ferraro brought up again today on Overdrive about how the Leafs don't talk at all when they're on the bench. No words of encouragement, no "let's go boys," it's as quiet as a morgue (my words). It's like queuing for the bus in England; go for your shift, come back, shuffle down, rinse, repeat. Now I never played at a high level but our benches in hockey always had noise going on, especially during our playoffs, and I'd reckon everyone else that's played hockey would say the same. I don't know, maybe that's just how it is around the league now and we just focus on the Leafs too much, but at this point I'd even take a high pitched "somebody f***ing go" at this point.
The coach has already lost the room? It was pointed out in the Marner thread that Keefe doesn't hold him accountable in the same way Babcock held Nylander accountable.The media wont say it but I will....
This team it appears, has locker room issues. Someone doesn't like someone. This jives with what Ferraro was saying. Its also supported by this team not giving a bleep for many games. They don't play for each other nor are they reliable for one another.
And yet...... those Pat Burns/Pat Quinn Leaf teams that basically did not have a ton of skill and were loaded with toughness didn't come through all the time themselves in big spots. But those teams were so beloved despite their playoff shortcomings.
This is a hard lesson for Dubas and for certain fans.
Skill was supposed to be only thing that Dubas needed to deliver on, and for fans to hang their hats on (oh those glorious stats and wonderful underlying numbers!). Once again we are still watching Kyle learn on the job. You can almost kiss this season goodbye and this core while you're at it. You can hope that the goaltending, powerplay, systems all iron out. But you're never going to change this team's personality (or lack of it). I'm sorry to say it but having so much invested in 4 players left us no room to have those personalities in our make-up. How is this quiet / no emotion team going to turn that around ? It's near impossible.
I agree. I do think 92-93 was the year. It was a great run but I still insist they should have beat the Kings, and ultimately the Habs, even though Roy was playing out of his mind--unbeatable in OT. Those Dougie/Wendel playoff runs were a ton of fun though.Their "playoff shortcomings" were the best playoff results this franchise has had since 1967.
Hard to know but guys making peanuts on a relative basis can get ticked at guys making a boatload and not giving their all. And there are times like on the west coast trip where Mitch and Matty should have had their *sses planted to the bench. And Keefe did nothing. By doing nothing it sends a message to team. You can say whatever you want after a game. But a coach sometimes has to make hard decisions even when they really like a player.The coach has already lost the room? It was pointed out in the Marner thread that Keefe doesn't hold him accountable in the same way Babcock held Nylander accountable.
Maybe this is weighing on the players a bit?
And, you know what, thanks to the overpayment on the fab 4, there's little to no money to upgrade the bottom 6, or the D!My opinion:
Leafs have 2 lines with lots of skill that just don't want to work and play a hard game. (Save for Hyman).
Then, they have 2 lines that work, and can play a hard game. They just have little to no skill.
Engvall - Kerfoot - Malgin
Clifford - Goat - Spezza
Neither one of those lines would scare me as an opposing team. They aren't really a threat to light you up on the scoresheet, and neither line is a sound defensive line to keep a team off the scoresheet.
The D has struggled, but that California road trip cannot be blamed on the blueline or the goaltenders. The forwards got caught up in a few hard, tight games and didn't know how to adjust.
And, you know what, thanks to the overpayment on the fab 4, there's little to no money to upgrade the bottom 6, or the D!
These fab 4 are all money, no compete, no desire to share the wealth for the good of the team!
So, you don't think the fab 3 should have taken a little less money each to provide Dubas with more money to upgrade the team elsewhere?Share the wealth? Is TOR not Marxist enough to make the post-season?
This is highly cynical, and TOR's situation is more complex.
Boston are doing quite well this season and Chara is not handing over his paycheck to the other players.
So, you don't think the fab 3 should have taken a little less money each to provide Dubas with more money to upgrade the team elsewhere?
Tavares apparently took less than what was supposedly offered to him by SJ. An extra 4 or 5 million could have been used to upgrade our Leafs.
Boston's top line is miles better than ours, and, are far cheaper too.