TeddyBare
Registered User
Yeah and without the lottery you would have had nico or Patrick instead of petterson
Multiple times Vancouver Management has confirmed that they didnt have either player #1 or 2
Linden hinted it was Makar I believe.
Yeah and without the lottery you would have had nico or Patrick instead of petterson
Well then it's incredibly unfair to teams like chicago, minny, montreal and arizona that they had good years and didnt get to participate in the playoffsit's incredibly unfair to teams in the playoffs that chicago, minny, montreal or arizona could have gotten hughes.
I think people could look at certain players and say "they got rushed, they should have been brought along more slowly / given better support." Tage Thompson of Buffalo stands out as a very recent example; not saying Thompson is some sure-fire top-6 guy in this league, but his first two pro seasons between St. Louis and Buffalo quite arguably harmed his long-term development. The Blues threw him into the fire when pretty obviously not ready and expected him to carry lesser players and quasi-anchor a line with no prior NHL experience, then shuffled him back and forth from the AHL to compound things; Buffalo just left him in the NHL and let him struggle and then exiled him to the press box when he struggled instead of getting him to the AHL and letting him gain some confidence and work through his mistakes in a lower-pressure setting.One could claim drafted players can also get hurt by these teams then not developing them properly (putting them in NHL too soon etc). Not sure there’s much merit to that.
They can throw fits if they like, and I can call them stupid for doing so.
If they had never changed the rules in the first place McDavid wouldn't be a member of the Oilers right now.
Bet mcdavid hates the new rules more than anyone
Edmonton only got 1oa 4 times because of the lottery. They only finished last twice. If you want to eliminate teams from getting 1oa 4 times, eliminate the lottery. Draft in reverse order of standings.
I can't wait until Edmonton wins the lotto again from like 22nd place and everyone loses their minds.
Or a team like Pittsburgh misses the playoffs by 1 point next year and they win 1oa. Or tampa has another random down year and they miss the playoffs by 1 point and win 1oa.
Edmonton only got 1oa 4 times because of the lottery. They only finished last twice. If you want to eliminate teams from getting 1oa 4 times, eliminate the lottery. Draft in reverse order of standings.
I can't wait until Edmonton wins the lotto again from like 22nd place and everyone loses their minds.
Or a team like Pittsburgh misses the playoffs by 1 point next year and they win 1oa. Or tampa has another random down year and they miss the playoffs by 1 point and win 1oa.
This is a very good point
also, the aim of the Lottery is to reduce teams intentionally putting out bad rosters in order to get a better draft position. Because we don't know if any teams would have operated differently had the draft been strict reverse order, we cannot measure its efficacy.
BUT
Just because you can't measure its efficacy doesn't mean its not effective. Being at the bottom of the league is less of a meal ticket than it was before. in theory, this should discourage tanking.
I apologize for my lack of "woke-ness"This is the narrative that league puts out and the sheep gobble it up for consumption. The real reason for the lottery is control over the assets.
I apologize for my lack of "woke-ness"
what else have I missed Shepherd?
That's probably the single most logical idea that stems from this thread.This I think is the mistake.
First overall should be an lottery of bottom 5
Then top 10 get in the lottery for 2
All non playoff teams in the third.
De incentivized the tank. Doesn’t allow a 95 pt team to get the first overall.
2 teams tied for 8th place and a ROW deciding factor takes one of those teams out of the playoffs > no problemThe bottom teams should have a chance. The player doesn't just make them better. The player can draw revenue for a struggling franchise. Maybe you change it to bottom 10, but at what point is the line drawn? 2 teams tied for 10th place and a ROW deciding factor eliminates of those teams from being in the lottery drawing? People are going to complain about that either way.