Golden_Jet
Registered User
- Sep 21, 2005
- 25,703
- 13,195
A couple of players every 20 years or so, after that your talking franchise players.because there is no clear definition here
A couple of players every 20 years or so, after that your talking franchise players.because there is no clear definition here
A generation is a decade IMO. 20 years is too wide a gap.Who decided this?
Disagree. A generation is the time from a parent having a kid, until the kid has a kid.A generation is a decade IMO. 20 years is too wide a gap.
Sure that scrub Draisaitl sucks.We toss the term generational around to free and easy these days.
I commented earlier about this but now lets let the numbers do the talking
Kuch first year was 13/14
HE is 4th in pts overall since then
McDavid 655 games 988 pts
Crosby 808 games 937 pts
MacKinnon 796 games 908 pts
Kuch 729 games 882 pts
McDavid is the clear Generational talent of Kuch's era with Crosby being the Generational talent of the previous generation.
Let me put it another way
You have a draft year of
McDavid
Crosby
Mackinnon
Kuch
Patrick Kane
Alex O
Anze Kopitar
Steve Stamkos
Geno Malkin
How many seriously take Kuch over McDavid and Crosby?
For me, the term "Generational" goes to the guy you point at and go there and say "it is him"
Kuch is a great player but he is not a generational talent, in my opinion, part of being a generational talent is not just looking at what that player is doing but other players of his era.
Both McDavid and Crosby would be the ones going 1 and 2 in any draft in the list I posted. Nothing against Kuch but he is also helped by having a lot of good players on his team. Having a clear number 1 d man in Hedman, Number 1 goalie in Vis and a supporting cast that is and was pretty good.
Both McDavid and Crosby did a lot of damage with little or no support from the supporting cast the teams put together early in their career
Gretzky, Lemieux, Howe, Orr, Crosby, Ovie and Mcdavid are generational talents, this can not be argued and not every player who has a good year is Generational simply an elite player having a good year. The word Generational is being watered down so much lately, no Kucherov who is a very good player mind you, but no he's not generational, nor will he ever be considered one accept by a few morons on hfboards who have no understanding of what it actually is. If I was going to add one player to the list of Generational players it would be Hasek not Kucherov.What`s the argument for McDavid being a generational player, but Kucherov isn`t one? Either they are both or none of them is. Kucherov has beaten a prime McDavid TWICE in outstanding fashion in the Art Ross Race. How often have prime Gretzky and Lemieux lost to a non generational player?
On top of that, Kucherov`s success in the playoffs is obviuolsy on a totally different level than McDavid. There are ZERO arguments for McDavid being generational while Kucherov isn`t.
I don`t say that Kucherov is better, but a generational player has to seperate himself from non generational players in a different way.
Bedard is not a generational talent, he was an over hyped prospect who will be a very good player but no he's not generational.No in 2022 and still no today. Obviously depends how we define generational talent.
IMO, it is players who are leaps and bounds ahead of their piers vs great careers.
Orr
Gretzky
Lemieux
Jagr
Crosby
Ovechkin
McDavid
Malkin had the talent but injuries derailed him.
Makar currently has the best case to argue, but is more in the Lidstrom tier of all time great vs "generational".
Bedard and Celebrini are hard maybes
Again, what qualifies McDavid as a generational talent? Being Canadian?Gretzky, Lemieux, Howe, Orr, Crosby, Ovie and Mcdavid are generational talents, this can not be argued and not every player who has a good year is Generational simply an elite player having a good year. The word Generational is being watered down so much lately, no Kucherov who is a very good player mind you, but no he's not generational, nor will he ever be considered one accept by a few morons on hfboards who have no understanding of what it actually is. If I was going to add one player to the list of Generational players it would be Hasek not Kucherov.
I think Kucherov is a bit of a unique case that this year-based comparison doesn't work perfectly for, because it undersells the dominance of his peak vs. a player like Kane - while Kane's longevity is superior.Well, he was drafted in 2011. 13 years later, this is his trophy case and awards:
3 time First Team All-Star
2 time Second Team All-Star
2 time Art Ross Winner
1 time Hart Trophy Winner
1 time Lindsay Trophy Winner
So no, I wouldn't say so. Here is Patrick Kane's at the same point in his career:
3 time First Team All-Star
1 time Second Team All-Star
1 time Art Ross Winner
1 time Hart Trophy Winner
1 time Lindsay Trophy Winner
And no one has ever pushed Kane as a generational talent. You can be a really good player for an extended period of time without being close to generational.
Uhm 5 art rosses, 40+ points in the playoffs? He's very much proven he's generational and no I consider Hasek to be a generational goalie so I dont think being Canadian is a prerqusite, and I disagree that he's hasn't earned the LableAgain, what qualifies McDavid as a generational talent? Being Canadian?
He lost the Art Ross in his prime to "non generational players" Three Times.
Again, I did not say that Kucherov is gerational, I just said that if he isn`t so can`t be McDavid.
A generational player is head and shouders above his peers, unless one of his peers is generational, as well.
No one denies that McDavid is exceptional but there are a few players in his gneration that are right n his heels. Something that couldn`t be said about other generational players.
Again, what qualifies McDavid as a generational talent? Being Canadian?
He lost the Art Ross in his prime to "non generational players" Three Times.
Again, I did not say that Kucherov is gerational, I just said that if he isn`t so can`t be McDavid.
A generational player is head and shouders above his peers, unless one of his peers is generational, as well.
No one denies that McDavid is exceptional but there are a few players in his gneration that are right n his heels. Something that couldn`t be said about other generational players.
Whether he is or not, to claim that he isn't on McDavid's level over the course of their careers would just be rejecting truth.
Kucherov has the 2nd and 3rd strongest Art Rosses, he is pretty close in points per game (it's not the Gretzky sitiation with Wayne having 2.2 PPG over the runner-up's 1.3 PPG), he outscored McD twice in full seasons (not just got the Forsberg Trophy for imaginary points), he has just had 100 assists as well, he does have the team success despite McDavid having the strongest teammate between the two (Draisaitl) and he shows no signs of slowing down despite being in his 30s.
People are struggling with accepting this because McDavid was called a prodigy and a generational talent since his early teens, and a Russian winger picked (somehow) in the 2nd round being just as good (or even just a little bit behind) is unthinkable, but it's the way things are.
McDavid is head and shoulders above his peers. His career points per game and assists per game is only behind the two greatest players in NHL history. He is likely to be the 4th fastest player in NHL history to get to 1,000 points. He has had seven 100 points seasons, only 3 players have had more and McDavid is only half way though his career. The amount of personal awards won so far in his career by age 27, only players like Gretzky, Lemieux, and Orr are comparable in the entire history of the NHL. Not one single player in his age group currently in the NHL is even in the same galaxy when comparing their overall personal career achievements to his. If that is not generational, then no one will ever be generational again.Again, what qualifies McDavid as a generational talent? Being Canadian?
He lost the Art Ross in his prime to "non generational players" Three Times.
Again, I did not say that Kucherov is gerational, I just said that if he isn`t so can`t be McDavid.
A generational player is head and shouders above his peers, unless one of his peers is generational, as well.
No one denies that McDavid is exceptional but there are a few players in his gneration that are right n his heels. Something that couldn`t be said about other generational players.