You can say what you want, you are implying that Crosby did something magically different than McDavid defensively when he played that it was such a big factor that it outweighs him scoring 4 points in 7 games vs. McDavid scoring 11 points in 7 games in their respective final series, and that because McDavid didn't score in game 7 and they lost, and Crosby didn't score and they won, they won because of his defense, but Oilers didn't win because of McDavid of him not scoring 12-14 points in the series.
Fact is Penguins had better depth help offensively when it comes to a more rounded game, and more core depth in regards to goalies + better depth on defense. If Penguins was soo bad like many claim, Detroit would have scored 4-5 goals or won it in six games.
Fact is Penguins was a better team than what Penguins fans try to give them credit for.