NobodyBeatsTheWiz
Happy now?
You could make an argument, but it's flimsy. As noted in the thread, Trout is the strongest case against in the MLB. I think Aaron Donald also has a strong case for being the greatest athlete to enter the NFL in that time frame. Ovechkin has 3 Harts, 9 Richards, 800 goals, a Conn Smythe, and a Cup -- McDavid needs more to pass that greatness (and that's not even touching on Crosby, for whom a good argument has been made).
If you consider players that have played in the big 4, the case becomes flimsier. Tom Brady enters the chat. Peyton Manning is in there. Lemieux was still playing. Nick Lidstrom had 4 Norris trophies left to win. Barry Bonds was still hitting 40+ HRs a year.
Expand beyond the big 4 leagues, and it's an emphatic 'no'. Messi is unquestionably "greater", IMO, and he debuted for Barca after LeBron. Tiger Woods hit his peak in 2005, and I think he's a top-2 professional athlete ever. Michael Phelps is the most dominant Olympian of all time, and didn't win his first gold medal until 2004.
Also, what do you mean by "greatest"? Is it purely talent level? Is it talent level combined with accomplishment? Is it purely accomplishment?
If you consider players that have played in the big 4, the case becomes flimsier. Tom Brady enters the chat. Peyton Manning is in there. Lemieux was still playing. Nick Lidstrom had 4 Norris trophies left to win. Barry Bonds was still hitting 40+ HRs a year.
Expand beyond the big 4 leagues, and it's an emphatic 'no'. Messi is unquestionably "greater", IMO, and he debuted for Barca after LeBron. Tiger Woods hit his peak in 2005, and I think he's a top-2 professional athlete ever. Michael Phelps is the most dominant Olympian of all time, and didn't win his first gold medal until 2004.
Also, what do you mean by "greatest"? Is it purely talent level? Is it talent level combined with accomplishment? Is it purely accomplishment?