GhostofKenKlee
Guest
urbom claimed on waivers by the capitals. anyone here that thinks he wasn't offered for trade? perhaps lou just woke up and wanted to waive him, that's sounds about right.
I don't know. Be a fan of the:
Islanders
Panthers
Predators
Leafs
Sabres
Flames
Hurricanes
Blue Jackets
Oilers
Rangers
Flyers
Coyotes
Caps
Jets
maybe?
All of the above teams haven't done anything in the last whatever years. Not all of their organizations are wholly dysfunctional, but despite having all of the money and talent in the world the Rags, Caps and Flyers aren't world beaters. Despite first round draft picks out the wazoo the Oilers and Islanders aren't exactly tearing it up.
These teams are finally looking up after hitting rock bottom and getting first round picks or stealing FAs who 'want to go home':
Avs
Wild
Senators
Lightning
Leafs
So maybe a breath of fresh air might help things if you find the right guy. I just don't think that Lou's performance has suddenly dropped off -
Geez - be a little harder on a guy who has had a fairly rough deck dealt to him.
Tell me where any team in the league would be after losing its two top players to free agency and retirement. Crosby+Malkin? Ovechkin+Backstrom? Kane+Toews? Couture+Thornton? Perry+Getzlaf?
Think any of the above teams would be sniffing the playoffs?
For every islander perennial rebuild there is a situation like Chicago or St. Louis. Secondly, this almost unhealthy obsession with Lou Lamiorello as if he's the only qualified hockey mind to run the New Jersey Devils in a vastly different NHL environment than he originally thrived in, is puzzling at best.
For every islander perennial rebuild there is a situation like Chicago or St. Louis. Secondly, this almost unhealthy obsession with Lou Lamiorello as if he's the only qualified hockey mind to run the New Jersey Devils in a vastly different NHL environment than he originally thrived in, is puzzling at best.
Guess what, we're now part of that horrible group you've just listed above for the past several years now if we remove our "fluke" cup run.
Why is it so painfull for some to say that the man who basically built this franchise in our glory days is now doing the opposite cause he has his hands in every single aspect of our team and his "old schooled" approach isn't getting any traction in today's game.
The man woke up 5 years too late when talking about generating offense from the backend. Granted, he's been drafting those type of blueliners in the past couple of drafts, the same type of d-men we've been requesting for god knows when but the bottom line is that he put this franchise on hold for not doing is homework earlier.
He was proactive regarding our goaltender situation but only half of the work is done cause now he needs to resign Schneider to a multi year deal and if we look at our previous track record regarding our pending UFA, it's nothing short of a MASSSSSSSIVE DISASTER.
You might say that the Clarkson signing by the Leafs is a joke but Lou managed to "one up" the Leafs by giving a similar contract to Clowe. We proceeded to sign Brunner and Ryder as well, who are known as snipers but we don't have a legit center who can feed both players, so they're looking like hot garbage as we speak and if both players aren't producing offensively, they're value to our lineup is almost on par with what Janssen gives us... ****ing nothing.
The point you make regarding other teams being in the crapper after losing their star players is the exact reason why certain fans are sick on tired of the 71 year old "genius". The question you should ask yourself is this... "Why aren't other teams losing their star players like we've had to deal with over the past decade+?". What did the Ducks do in the past several years that could convince both Perry and Getzlaf to resign long term instead of testing free agency? Ovy and Backstrom? Why didn't John Tavares decide to sign the shortest of deals in order to hit free agency faster instead of inking a LTC on a team that's been in the gutter for decades?
To me, those are the real questions that needs be to answered. If we've been this model of success for the past 20 years, almost like the Wings, why can't we keep our own studs?
Guess what, we're now part of that horrible group you've just listed above for the past several years now if we remove our "fluke" cup run.
Why is it so painfull for some to say that the man who basically built this franchise in our glory days is now doing the opposite cause he has his hands in every single aspect of our team and his "old schooled" approach isn't getting any traction in today's game.
Granted, he's been drafting those type of blueliners in the past couple of drafts, the same type of d-men we've been requesting for god knows when but the bottom line is that he put this franchise on hold for not doing is homework earlier.
He was proactive regarding our goaltender situation but only half of the work is done cause now he needs to resign Schneider to a multi year deal and if we look at our previous track record regarding our pending UFA, it's nothing short of a MASSSSSSSIVE DISASTER.
what Janssen gives us... ****ing nothing.
except a couple of goals, emotional lift to go on a winning streak and someone who hits people and frees up pucks on the forecheck. But hey.
The point you make regarding other teams being in the crapper after losing their star players is the exact reason why certain fans are sick on tired of the 71 year old "genius". The question you should ask yourself is this... "Why aren't other teams losing their star players like we've had to deal with over the past decade+?".
Brodeur
Elias
Stevens
Dano
zajac
Henrique
greene
You are right, devils cannot hold on their studs.
where have you gone, Clarkson, Gomez, Rafalski, Martin, Rupp, Parise our nation cries for you.
Only one I ever lament getting away is Niedermayer.
wooof.
I love how fellow devils like to dismiss the cup run as a "fluke" to make themselves feel better on their narrative how the team sucks or they are in decline.
It reminds me of the trash talk after the devils won their "half cup" from rangers and flyers fans in 95. I don't remember that type of talk for Chicago from the devils bashers in the media and other trolls.
not saying he should be there on a nightly basis.
Was it a bad callup at the time?
The devils have let signficant assets leave for nothing. Zilch. Nada. That's where the blame lies. The 'genius' with his backward negotiating skills lets premium talent leave, despite knowing that New Jersey is considered a secondary market for NHL talent. You don't have to be a veritable rocket scientist to deduct that devil players reaching free agency are most likely going to depart. But don't tell Lou this. The 71 year old sage knows all!
The devils have let signficant assets leave for nothing. Zilch. Nada. That's where the blame lies. The 'genius' with his backward negotiating skills lets premium talent leave, despite knowing that New Jersey is considered a secondary market for NHL talent. You don't have to be a veritable rocket scientist to deduct that devil players reaching free agency are most likely going to depart. But don't tell Lou this. The 71 year old sage knows all!
yes, it was. and it still is. hes a terrible hockey player.
yes, it was. and it still is. hes a terrible hockey player.
Ok -
You trade your captain Parise mid-season and we don't get within a couple of games of winning the cup. Explain why to your fanbase, who believes he is coming back.
Ok-
You trade Kovy to ?? and the newly signed Devil-for-life contract because you think he's going to retire, and after all, we probably don't need his scoring. He then retires. What does the NHL do other than launch a probe to see if you had a priori knowledge of his planned retirement which would probably result in us losing more draft picks.
Ok-
You trade Clarkson because...aw heck...
What would you have done differently? The answer is- nothing.
Ok -
You trade your captain Parise mid-season and we don't get within a couple of games of winning the cup. Explain why to your fanbase, who believes he is coming back.
Ok-
You trade Kovy to ?? and the newly signed Devil-for-life contract because you think he's going to retire, and after all, we probably don't need his scoring. He then retires. What does the NHL do other than launch a probe to see if you had a priori knowledge of his planned retirement which would probably result in us losing more draft picks.
Ok-
You trade Clarkson because...aw heck...
What would you have done differently? The answer is- nothing.
Incorrect, it sparked the team. Results say it was a good move.
I wasn't specifically discussing the Parise situation. But it's always the same nonsense from the guy who erroneously thinks he's a player away from the SCF.
The devils aren't a big market team that can watch players that they developed, walk away with nothing in return. That's the issue. Lou lets talent walk away, instead of converting it into something tangible. Wasting resources in this league will come back to bite you. That I can you assure you.
Could we have gotten something for Clarkson in his final year here? That's one I could have seen done. Writing was on the wall with him. Toronto was going to overpay.
Should he have seen that Kovy was going to bolt mid-contract? I can't fault him for that. But laying that contract out there which resulted in the loss of picks is on Lou. People like to blame Kovy for that one, but that is one Lou.
Stunk that we lost him, but I can't argue with how it was handled. With the injury the year prior, and then the playoffs run in his final year? Puck Farise on that.
him scoring 2 garbage goals does not mean that calling him up was a good idea.
if you drive blindfolded but manage to get home safely, it does not mean it was a good idea.
him scoring 2 garbage goals does not mean that calling him up was a good idea.
if you drive blindfolded but manage to get home safely, it does not mean it was a good idea.