Is Connor Mcdavid a "tier above" Sidney Crosby as a player?

Is Connor Mcdavid a "tier above" Sidney Crosby as a player?


  • Total voters
    1,050
  • This poll will close: .
Status
Not open for further replies.

EXTRAS

Registered User
Jul 31, 2012
9,090
5,642
Mcdavid had a lot of points this season. Mcdavid did not dominate. Kucherov/mcdavid/mackinnon all pretty equal offensively. Just as many seasons crosby/ovi/malkin were similar. However this year contributes to mcdavid having a way better pt/gm than crosby. It's just a high scoring era so the difference between the two isn't as significant as people make it out to be.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
14,130
10,969
No I understand what is being discussed and your viewpoint about anything Crosby as do most people reading this thread.

No. You don't.

The Penguins have been quite good without Crosby over the years. Sure, they weren't very good his rookie season, and that's about it, but that amounts to 6.3% of his total games played. Yet you held that up as some sort of huge factor in the overall quality of the team around him. It isn't. It factors in on 6.3% of the sample.

So again, your post is not demonstrating a comprehension of the discussion, the numbers, the proportions, or the opinions being stated.

The fact is, the Penguins have generally had a points percentage ranging from .620 to .714 when Crosby is not on the ice. Crosby's team, without Crosby, has often been a first or second place team - and this specifically undermines the false narratives that Crosby fans have tried to sell over the years - that Sid is surrounded with AHL caliber players or carrying the team. Aside from his rookie season, it was never true.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: I am not exposed

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,016
12,688
These guys are in a tier right below Gretzky and Lemieux
GOATS Gretzky and Lemieux. Imagine them with modern day equiptment, coaching, and training. This rankings are just my opinion based on players I have seen in my lifetime and watched highlights off. I am in my late thirties. I am not claiming my opinion is absolute fact, but just my point of view.
Top 10 GOATS of all times
1a/b Gretzky and Lemieux
2a/2b Crosby/McDavid
3a/b Orr and Lidstrom
4a/4b Gordie and Mark
5a/5b Coffee and Borque
6a/6b Yzerman and Sackic
7a/7B Forsberg and Lindros
8a/8b Esposito and Howe
9a/9b Lafleur/Beliveau
10a/10b Richard Rocket and Brodeur
There are lot sof young hall of famers in the nhl currently, but no one outside of McDAvid has shown a top 10 status yet.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,016
12,688
In his rookie season Crosby's supporting cast was horrible and he was 18 it's like grading Bedard this season say if in 3 or 4 years he misses some games and the team has a better winning % than this season it's not because of Crosby but different team situations.
Good grief stop being so obtuse and read slower. It’s been written 3x now for you.

Crosby’s rookie season wasn’t included in calculation. Malkin wasn’t in the NHL yet.

 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,941
16,093
The funniest thing in this thread (at least in the recent pages) is that most of the people who advocate for McDavid over Crosby don’t even care about McDavid that much, they just hate Crosby with a passion and are just here to tear him down :laugh:
The exact same things can be said for Pens fans coming up with the most outlandish statements regarding McDavid to try and and prove (maybe to themselves?) that Crosby was better

In his rookie season Crosby's supporting cast was horrible and he was 18 it's like grading Bedard this season say if in 3 or 4 years he misses some games and the team has a better winning % than this season it's not because of Crosby but different team situations.

The user knows full well how week that argument is but he has his own agenda.


No I understand what is being discussed and your viewpoint about anything Crosby as do most people reading this thread.
The supporting casts of Crosby and Bedard were not even remotely comparable.
 

Midnight Judges

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 10, 2010
14,130
10,969
At any time, they could have shoved the absolute best linemates (in this case, Malkin etc.) onto Crosby's wing and saw his production skyrocket. They didn't, and even then, his on-ice impact was generational.

That is demonstrably false. They tried that. It didn't work.

In 2009, Malkin and Crosby played quite a bit together - factoring in on 50%+ of each other's points for the season. It absolutely did not result in their production "skyrocketing." Each of them matched or exceeded that productivity with other supporting players.

The truth is they aren't all that great together at ES - and we have quite a lot of data on this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golden_Jet

Nadal On Clay

Djokovic > Nadal > Federer
Oct 11, 2017
3,241
3,077
14 minute back checking video, I’ll be sure to show that to my grandchildren

Will help explain things
If your grandchildrens truly care about sports, they will ask you why Crosby won three times, while McDavid couldn’t win once, despite being surrounded by similar talent and dominating the league to a similar degree.

I truly wish you get to see your team win in your lifetime. You’ll see that the moment your guy touches the cup will be 100% times better than watching him at the NHL Awards get called to accept his Art-Ross.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,016
12,688
If your grandchildrens truly care about sports, they will ask you why Crosby won three times, while McDavid couldn’t win once, despite being surrounded by similar talent and dominating the league to a similar degree.

I truly wish you get to see your team win in your lifetime. You’ll see that the moment your guy touches the cup will be 100% times better than watching him at the NHL Awards get called to accept his Art-Ross.
Did McDavid retire?
What does video have to do with response. Nothing.
 

Voight

#winning
Feb 8, 2012
41,603
18,153
Mulberry Street
This year’s Edmonton team was every bit as good as the 91’ Pens……However, the Pens got it done, Edmonton did not. At some point whiny excuses have to be looked at as just that. At some point, you got to get the job done.

No it wasn't.

The 91 Pens had 9 hall of famers (including Jagr), I highly doubt the 2024 Oilers will come anywhere close to that. McDavid and Draisaitl sure, possibly Bouchard and then Perry (but he was a very minor contributor to this years team).
 

Frank Drebin

He's just a child
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,089
22,332
Edmonton
If your grandchildrens truly care about sports, they will ask you why Crosby won three times, while McDavid couldn’t win once, despite being surrounded by similar talent and dominating the league to a similar degree.

I truly wish you get to see your team win in your lifetime. You’ll see that the moment your guy touches the cup will be 100% times better than watching him at the NHL Awards get called to accept his Art-Ross.
Just like when I ask my dad why Larry Robinson won the cup 6 times and bobby Orr only twice

I grew up a habs fan. They are still my number one team

I watched them win in 1993. Long time ago. 2017 already 7 years ago too

It will be great to see mcdavid lift the cup
It won’t change my opinion on him as a player

You understand that, yes?
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,134
11,254
Yzerman was always committed to the program. The program didn't change to clamp the shit down until the '96-'97 season.
I'm sorry but the stats, you know the stuff you hang you hat on don't bare that narrative out.

Yzerman's SOG rate dramatically changed after the 93-94 season where the upstart sharks, led by a peak young Larionov beat the Red wings in a 7 game series for the ages.

Again, Yzerman's approach to the game never changed. He busted his ass and did what the coaches asked him to do. It might have looked different on the ice, but again, that's because the overall philosophy from the coaching staff changed. The whole team dramatically changed styles. It wasn't because Yzerman finally listened to the coaches. It's because the coaches were saying different things.
Just like your definition of defense with nobody being able to achieve it no players approach changes but the eye test tells us differently.


I specifically was talking about fans' discussion leadership, not players. And yes, fans spouting off on who is or isn't a leader is very condescending.
Then maybe follow your own advice here others shouldn't be limited by your incapacity to evaluate such things.
 

Nadal On Clay

Djokovic > Nadal > Federer
Oct 11, 2017
3,241
3,077
Just like when I ask my dad why Larry Robinson won the cup 6 times and bobby Orr only twice

I grew up a habs fan. They are still my number one team

I watched them win in 1993. Long time ago. 2017 already 7 years ago too

It will be great to see mcdavid lift the cup
It won’t change my opinion on him as a player

You understand that, yes?
Oh look, another apples to oranges comparison brought to you by the McDavid side to help them cope with their delusion.

You better jump off the Oilers bandwagon and get back on the Habs train, chances are they’ll have a better shot at the cup after 2026 when Edmonton has four 9M+ players in their lineup and won’t be able to afford anything else.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,134
11,254

“Which player is the most difficult player to face in their own end?”​

Really? Interesting….

So you can’t explain it basically :laugh: just say that.
Okay that's fair enough he got 9.48% of the vote with a strange question.

Something more definitive is the question of who is the most complete player in the game with 38.37% eh?

Also we are comparing careers not just a single season here right?

Or the "if you need to win a faceoff which player would you pick"? Crosby 2nd there again 13.59%

But sure your crowd think he is crap defensively.

But seriously I'm all for looking at these polls every year and other have mentioned them as well so it's great that you agree here that's some common ground.

be sure to tell your friends in Detroit and washington about the news.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
25,016
12,688
Oh look, another apples to oranges comparison brought to you by the McDavid side to help them cope with their delusion.

You better jump off the Oilers bandwagon and get back on the Habs train, chances are they’ll have a better shot at the cup after 2026 when Edmonton has four 9M+ players in their lineup and won’t be able to afford anything else.
Habs lol,
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,134
11,254
This doesn’t really bother me as much as you hope it does

I’ve been fortunate to be able to watch the best player since Mario Lemieux suit up for my home team for the last 9 seasons

We were gifted him and if we can’t build a proper team around him so be it. Won’t change his legacy any more than a 14 minute back checking video

I’ll still enjoy watching him dominate the regular season and playoffs in a way penguins fans haven’t seen since the early 90s

And I’m fully aware that if/once he leaves the oilers will never have another contender in my lifetime.

Just blessed to be able to enjoy this extraordinary player rather than sulking in the corner trying to trick myself into thinking my guy was actually better


And when the next one comes along I won’t be like these childish pens fans. I’ll enjoy and embrace that player and will spend zero time trying to convince myself that he’s not better than mcdavid
That's not what this thread is about the question is are they on the same tier?

And sure McDavid very well might pass him one day (and I think that could happen even without a SC) but don't go and start adding imaginary things as 2 certain guys will jump all over you for that....wait it's okay if you do it for McDavid by them so carry on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PainForShane

Frank Drebin

He's just a child
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,089
22,332
Edmonton
Oh look, another apples to oranges comparison brought to you by the McDavid side to help them cope with their delusion.

You better jump off the Oilers bandwagon and get back on the Habs train, chances are they’ll have a better shot at the cup after 2026 when Edmonton has four 9M+ players in their lineup and won’t be able to afford anything else.
Oilers cap situation is horrendous

9.5 million 3rd pairing guy
2 million buyout penalty on James neal
5 m in dead space for a supposed starter

That could really use a prime Crosby to lead them out of this mess

That's not what this thread is about the question is are they on the same tier?

And sure McDavid very well might pass him one day (and I think that could happen even without a SC) but don't go and start adding imaginary things as 2 certain guys will jump all over you for that....wait it's okay if you do it for McDavid by them so carry on.
Mcdavid is the better player

That puts him on a different tier by default

If you want to argue the size of the tier isn’t that large by exaggerating Crosbys accomplishments and minimizing Mcdavids that’s on you
 
  • Like
Reactions: crowfish

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,134
11,254
No. You don't.

The Penguins have been quite good without Crosby over the years. Sure, they weren't very good his rookie season, and that's about it, but that amounts to 6.3% of his total games played. Yet you held that up as some sort of huge factor in the overall quality of the team around him. It isn't. It factors in on 6.3% of the sample.

So again, your post is not demonstrating a comprehension of the discussion, the numbers, the proportions, or the opinions being stated.

The fact is, the Penguins have generally had a points percentage ranging from .620 to .714 when Crosby is not on the ice. Crosby's team, without Crosby, has often been a first or second place team - and this specifically undermines the false narratives that Crosby fans have tried to sell over the years - that Sid is surrounded with AHL caliber players or carrying the team. Aside from his rookie season, it was never true.
Typical general comments that mean nothing and the AHL strawman argument is yours no one else's.

Everyone knows that your downplaying of crosby serves one purpose only and that's to prop up your guy who is great but no crosby all time so it is what it is.

Good grief stop being so obtuse and read slower. It’s been written 3x now for you.

Crosby’s rookie season wasn’t included in calculation. Malkin wasn’t in the NHL yet.

It was included in MJ's original statement he isn't that fair about things everyone knows that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Golden_Jet

Nadal On Clay

Djokovic > Nadal > Federer
Oct 11, 2017
3,241
3,077
Oilers cap situation is horrendous

9.5 million 3rd pairing guy
2 million buyout penalty on James neal
5 m in dead space for a supposed starter

That could really use a prime Crosby to lead them out of this mess


Mcdavid is the better player

That puts him on a different tier by default

If you want to argue the size of the tier isn’t that large by exaggerating Crosbys accomplishments and minimizing Mcdavids that’s on you
Actually, you’d be asking the right guy. Crosby has been notoriously known for signing a 12 year contract at a lower salary agaisnt the cap that he could’ve gotten, just so his team could get out and get better players.

PuckPedia says that at the time of the signature, in 2012, Crosby’s cap hit of 8,7M accounted for 13,53% of the salary cap. That % has consistently gone down since and will be at just below 10% for the next season.

We’ll see if McDavid follows his footsteps by offering his team similar leverage to help them build a better team, at the signature of his next contract.
 

Frank Drebin

He's just a child
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,089
22,332
Edmonton
Actually, you’d be asking the right guy. Crosby has been notoriously known for signing a 12 year contract at a lower salary agaisnt the cap that he could’ve gotten, just so his team could get out and get better players.

PuckPedia says that at the time of the signature, in 2012, Crosby’s cap hit of 8,7M accounted for 13,53% of the salary cap. That % has consistently gone down since and will be at just below 10% for the next season.

We’ll see if McDavid follows his footsteps by offering his team similar leverage to help them build a better team, at the signature of his next contract.
A back diving, 12 year, illegal contract? Signed just before the new cba banning those types of contracts?

Altruistic Crosby was making 12m a year back in 2014,15,16

Altruistic Crosby made 86.4 m over the first 8 years of that deal an average of 10.8 per year

Which back in 2014 would have been 16.7 percent of the cap

In todays dollars that would be 14m

In 2 years when the cap is 90, about 15m

Let’s see if mcdavid is altruistic as Crosby was
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad