No. You don't.
The Penguins have been quite good without Crosby over the years. Sure, they weren't very good his rookie season, and that's about it, but that amounts to 6.3% of his total games played. Yet you held that up as some sort of huge factor in the overall quality of the team around him. It isn't. It factors in on 6.3% of the sample.
So again, your post is not demonstrating a comprehension of the discussion, the numbers, the proportions, or the opinions being stated.
The fact is, the Penguins have generally had a points percentage ranging from .620 to .714 when Crosby is not on the ice. Crosby's team, without Crosby, has often been a first or second place team - and this specifically undermines the false narratives that Crosby fans have tried to sell over the years - that Sid is surrounded with AHL caliber players or carrying the team. Aside from his rookie season, it was never true.