Is Attendance overrated?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

sawchuk1971

Registered User
Jun 16, 2011
1,517
546
I have been looking at the various attendance figures around the league this preseason.

I see Montreal has 20K fans in one game while Winnipeg only got 12K against Edmonton. Just saw Columbus had a number of 7k fans one preseason game.

Several years ago, the Canadian hockey supremacists on this site believed attendance was important.

The NHL, they claimed, depended on gate revenue to survive. Canadian teams got more fan support than teams located in the sun belt. That situation has changed as sun belt teams are doing well; winning cups, having sellout arenas in recent years.

Now you see places like Winnipeg, who had season of sellouts now can’t find fans to pay for tickets.

Can we say that attendance is overrated?
 

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,473
8,804
Overrated based on what metric?

Low attendance during regular season means a metric of disinterest. For business purposes, the team needs to address it to avoid further issues with lack of support of the team.

Attendance in preseason answers the question to what metric? How many teams have fans that prefer generic store brand to name brand products? Scrutinizing attendance for preseason is dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joestevens29

Djp

Registered User
Jul 28, 2012
24,533
5,972
Alexandria, VA
Preseason games if donr on weekend nbn d and earlier can be marketed as a kid friendly family event with much lower ticket prices than s regular season game
 

Peltz

Registered User
Oct 4, 2019
3,652
5,086
By any measure, how could ticket sales and attendance NOT be important?

Preseason certainly matters substantially less though.
 

LuckyDay

Registered User
Mar 25, 2011
1,897
1,371
The Uncanny Valley
A lot of preseason games are played outside of the main rinks as exhibition games to drum up interest in other cities and as an outreach to remote fans - it also costs less since there's just not the attendance or interest to sustain a bigger arena.
If they can't draw a crowd then they've either picked the wrong city or are charging way too much for a ticket for what used to be a can of beans given to charity.
 
Last edited:

Cowumbus

Registered User
Mar 1, 2014
11,891
6,683
Arena District - Columbus
I have been looking at the various attendance figures around the league this preseason.

I see Montreal has 20K fans in one game while Winnipeg only got 12K against Edmonton. Just saw Columbus had a number of 7k fans one preseason game.

Several years ago, the Canadian hockey supremacists on this site believed attendance was important.

The NHL, they claimed, depended on gate revenue to survive. Canadian teams got more fan support than teams located in the sun belt. That situation has changed as sun belt teams are doing well; winning cups, having sellout arenas in recent years.

Now you see places like Winnipeg, who had season of sellouts now can’t find fans to pay for tickets.

Can we say that attendance is overrated?
CBJ first home preseason game had Kuraly listed as the 1C. I had tickets and still didn’t go. Nothingburger.
 

DL44

Status quo
Sep 26, 2006
17,944
3,866
Location: Location:
If your team's attendance is a little lower, then yes, it's overrated.
But if your team sells very well and fans fill most of the building, then no, it's not overrated.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,100
142,068
Bojangles Parking Lot
Complicated question.

It’s overrated if you’re still in a 1985 mindset where the key to profit is filling the building every night.

It’s underrated if you think ticket sales don’t matter at all, and TV eyeballs are somehow going to carry a team that doesn’t fill its own building.

At the end of the day, what really matters is the color of the ink on the bottom line. If your team is making money, they’re doing just fine and the haters can go f themselves. If they’re losing money, it really doesn’t matter how full the building is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poppy Whoa Sonnet

SmoggyTwinkles

Go Leafs Go
Aug 5, 2010
7,107
3,854
Oshawa
www.bing.com
Attending an NHL hockey game is absolutely over-rated, overbloated $$$$, not worth it.

I can watch that on my big screen in surround for a whole lot less.

Oh wait, you mean as far as numbers of people that actually attend and if that's important?

Probably for the corporate owners of the teams.
 

Figgy44

A toast of purple gato for the memories
Dec 15, 2014
13,473
8,804
A lot of preseason games are played outside of the main rinks as exhibition games to drum up interest in other cities and as an outreach to remote fans - it also costs less since there's just not the attendance or interest to sustain a bigger arena.
If they can't draw a crowd then they've either picked the wrong city or are charging way too much for a ticket for what used to be a can of beans given to charity.

This is a good point too. If I'm not mistaken, the Flames/Canucks game was played in Abbotsford which is over an hour away from the normal arena. Most fans aren't putting in that extra effort to go there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LuckyDay

HBK27

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2005
14,077
15,041
Northern NJ
I think it's overrated to a point, considering the price of tickets often has an impact on the attendance.

For teams that don't pack the house on a nightly basis, I'm sure you could lower ticket prices to drive up attendance numbers, but then teams would likely be making less money overall so it's just not worth it.
 

Cup or Bust

Registered User
Oct 17, 2017
4,317
3,771
Well attendance for preseason games is probably not very important but didn't the Jets owner already complain about the attendance numbers and say they have to improve for the Jets to be sustainable long term in that market? No matter how large the TV contracts get an owner is not going to accept losing revenue in a market that cannot draw fans to their arena for games. It it is definitely not overrated.
 

Megustaelhockey

"I like hockey" in Spanish
Apr 29, 2011
22,543
16,101
Attendance matters for optics, but revenue is truly king.

I just wish people would stop paying to watch bad hockey just because they think they have to keep attendance up.
 

MoneyManny

Registered User
Jun 28, 2021
859
1,297
I have been looking at the various attendance figures around the league this preseason.

I see Montreal has 20K fans in one game while Winnipeg only got 12K against Edmonton. Just saw Columbus had a number of 7k fans one preseason game.

Several years ago, the Canadian hockey supremacists on this site believed attendance was important.

The NHL, they claimed, depended on gate revenue to survive. Canadian teams got more fan support than teams located in the sun belt. That situation has changed as sun belt teams are doing well; winning cups, having sellout arenas in recent years.

Now you see places like Winnipeg, who had season of sellouts now can’t find fans to pay for tickets.

Can we say that attendance is overrated?
Attendance by itself is extremely overrated. Every seat is not created equal.

Sun belt teams basically gave their tickets away (not sure if it's still valid) while seats in Montreal will cost you a pretty penny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: joestevens29

End on a Hinote

Registered Abuser
Aug 22, 2011
4,294
2,490
Northern British Columbia
......the Canadian hockey supremacists on this site believed attendance was important.

The NHL, they claimed, depended on gate revenue to survive. Canadian teams got more fan support than teams located in the sun belt. That situation has changed as sun belt teams are doing well; winning cups, having sellout arenas in recent years.

Now you see places like Winnipeg, who had season of sellouts now can’t find fans to pay for tickets.

Can we say that attendance is overrated?
This has got to be the most thinly veiled "You SUCK Canada!" thread I've read on a hot minute.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad