He got two years of term as a 34-year old. Aging curves suggest that's risky. He has 8 points in his last 5 games so it's not like he's been a prolific scorer all season.
A $3m x 2 is not a big risk, I actually think you've got a bigger risk that a given young player falls down on the job.
FWIW, even without Bergeron and Krejci, the Bruins are significantly older, currently with 3 players 34+ years old. Do they not know about age curves?
if you swapped duclair and nyquist this year, their statlines probably flip too, because their circumstances have that big of an impact.
The statlines is kind of besides the point, Duclair is functionally no different in two way impact from a half dozen forwards we have, while Nyquist did things for us that are left undone on our current team. His ability to score in 4 v 5 and 5 v 6 situations for example. His ability to hold the puck and end a panic, that's actually what I miss the most.
The Jackets don't need another Jake or Nyquist or any other aging star of yesteryear. What they need is time to have a new core develop and better goaltending would help. Adding JG hasn't helped improve the record. Laine hasn't helped the record. There will be a time down the road to add a key veteran piece but it isn't now.
To me this is like asking for the torch to be passed, when we stopped running a while back and fell in a ditch and are now unable to get back on our feet. There are basic elements of team structure that have to be established and passed on and we don't have anyone to do the passing on.
Here's another question, who is more talented, the Blue Jackets or the Bruins that beat us last night? I'm honestly not sure. When I watch the Bruins I don't see many super skilled plays, they're just always in the right spot, as outlets and in terms of defensive positioning.