bromando
Registered User
- Jun 4, 2013
- 892
- 164
I see him as a future #3. The term bust to me is highly variable to what was expected of the player when he came out. For instance, in the 2005 draft Benoit Pouliot was a top 5 pick that was expected to be a game changing forward when he really is just a 2nd/3rd line tweener. Where as somebody like Downie is a similar tweener, but was a later pick so I wouldn't consider him a bust.
Larsson was said to be a franchise defensemen when the draft came around, for him to only end up as a middle pairing defender is a bust IMO... but he still can be a solid player in the NHL.
I don't think the teams trading for him would have a significantly better pick. No team in the top 10-15 is going to send their 1st to New Jersey for Larsson (well I shouldn't put anything past Edmonton). The teams looking at him for a project will be in that 15-25 range, which isn't a huge difference in value. The plus would be small with any team as Larsson's value isn't much higher than a mid 1st as it sits. Many teams will value a defensemen that they can mold (ie no bad professional habits yet and more years under control) like McKeown than a reclamation project like Larsson. Right or wrong that is the way these things usually work.
Well I would be down to get him for a first and a small + if that's possible. I can't see that being worth it to NJ personally.