If this season continues on this path do we go full rebuild in the offseason?

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

If this season ends like last season do you support a full rebuild?


  • Total voters
    25

Dubi Doo

Registered User
Aug 27, 2008
20,202
14,060
I'm over this core. I believe the stank runs too deep. Of course, there's time to turn it around, and if that happens, then great! Prove me wrong! Feed me crow! I don't think my appetite is going to be filled, though.

It's becoming more and more apparent that the stank has rubbed off on a bunch of our leadership core. Theyre too nonchalant in key moments of games, they still rely too much on skill, and theyre approaching damage beyond repair in this 'culture'.

If this year goes like last year, then Im down for a complete rebuild. Dahlin, Cozens, Tuch, etc...they can bring back quite the haul. They'll go onto greener pastures, and excell in their new roles, but it aint happening here.

We desperately need a new GM and new leadership in the lockerroom. We have assets teams value, and we have young players who can still be saved from this mess.

I'd be fine with keeping Ruff around to implement a system and have these boys playing the right way. Everything else, though? Peace.

I dont have much trust in Pegula making a smart GM hire, but what we know with what we have now just aint cutting it, so the unknown is more enticing.
 

Fjordy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
16,932
9,284
No and we don't need it. The problem is not the players, we have good players, mostly all of them are still young, a smart GM can build a good team with these players with the addition of quality coaches and 3-4 good players (not necessarily elite or expensive), just the right parts that Adams hasn't taken care of this years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My Cozen Dylan

Dreakon13

Registered User
Jun 28, 2010
4,382
1,466
Mighty Taco, NY
Adams bet on this group. When I say this group, I mean Thompson, Cozens, Dahlin, Power, Samuelsson... the kids who got their big deals and didn't get moved out. Cap space is reserved to re-sign Peterka, Quinn, maybe Byram, maybe Greenway, maybe Tuch, maybe Benson, etc. He bet on all these guys staying at or around 22-23 form or improving. He knew they lacked speed, physicality and intensity and tried to address that via the bottom 6. He knew they lacked structure and tried to address that with Ruff.

It's all been a big swing. If that plan fails, and it's looking more likely than not, I couldn't say if they need to rebuild or not. The hole has just gotten too deep and too complicated.

What I can say is it's time to finally bring in a GM and people around them with experience and a track record of success. If they do that, as a fan I'll go along with their plan. If they don't, rebuild or not I guess it doesn't really matter what they do since it probably won't work.
 
Last edited:

SabresFan26

Registered User
May 28, 2003
10,837
2,378
Visit site
No we fire Kevyn Adams and let someone come in and build a team the right way. Not just collecting talent, it's about building a team. Someone with experience. Get rid of Adams, Forton, and any other proxies who are unqualified (Appert, Wilford, and Bales).
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike and goach

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,757
21,607
MN
Tearing down a team that is rebuilding is not the way to go. Something is off in BUF, for sure, but i think it's more about the off ice personnel. I was against the Ruff hire, thought the Skinner buyout was stupid and reactionary(as was the original contract awarded to him)... KA is not impressing me.

BUF has enough "talent", but need to build a team culture. Rewarding tough, defensive, resilient play needs to be part of it, but it starts with competence in management. I'm not sure that it is there.

I think the NHL is weak right now. There is no reason that the Sabres can't get into the playoffs, and even win a round, if they can avoid playing FLA.

If the Sabres are going to do any "tearing down", it needs to be in the coaching or GM ranks. I mean, how much can it hurt the on ice product? If anything, it might briefly give them a kick in the ass, or some hope, but just firing people(or players) without a plan will get them nowhere.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778 and Fjordy

Fjordy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2018
16,932
9,284
Tearing down a team that is rebuilding is not the way to go. Something is off in BUF, for sure, but i think it's more about the off ice personnel. I was against the Ruff hire, thought the Skinner buyout was stupid and reactionary(as was the original contract awarded to him)... KA is not impressing me.

BUF has enough "talent", but need to build a team culture. Rewarding tough, defensive, resilient play needs to be part of it, but it starts with competence in management. I'm not sure that it is there, right now.

I think the NHL is weak right now. There is no reason that the Sabres can't get into the playoffs right now, and even win a round, if they can avoid playing FLA.

If the Sabres are going to do any "tearing down", it needs to be in the coaching or GM ranks. I mean, how much can it hurt the on ice product? If anything, it might briefly give them a kick in the ass, or some hope, but just firing people(or players) without a plan will get them nowhere.
Even a non-Buffalo fan understands this. Our GM is incompetent, our coach doesn't seem to be allowed to bring his own people to the coaching staff, our special teams are some of the worst in the league, and our roster is full of holes and unbalance, and that's not the players' fault.

We don’t need another (eternal) rebuilding or even any serious re-equipment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sabremike

OkimLom

Registered User
May 3, 2010
15,571
7,018
I lean towards a re-tooling of sorts, with cutting some financial fat off the roster, unless they take a pay cut for the FA's-to be, and accept a demotion in their role on the roster. But if a new GM decides this roster needs a rebuild, then so be it. I don't think the current roster has the Hockey-DNA I want out of them that will lead them to be successful, or they haven't shown it yet.

A rebuild isn't my 1st option, but I'm not closed-off from accepting one if they would want one.
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,689
39,659
Rochester, NY
The Sabres have had 7 forwards, 5 D, and 2 goalies who are 25 years old or younger play a game this season.

One of the biggest issues with the lack of success over the past 8 years or so is that they never allow the young players to fully develop before things get blown up. And then we get people decrying that players are blossoming elsewhere after they were traded away.

The Sabres do not need to keep every 25 or younger player that they have today. But, blowing up the core completely and moving Dahlin, Thompson, Power, Peterka, and others will be repeating past mistakes, IMO.
 

May Day 10

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
739
432
St Catharines, ON
I said no because I thought the question was "do I think they will do it"

I support it, with the right environment.

In my opinion, what ails this franchise the most is an acceptance of losing. Dropping a game(s) or seasons is acceptable as long as you 'learn' from it and the owner feels like we are getting closer to the success that he feels is inevitable. People at the Keybank Center make a lot of money. Players make millions and have long, guaranteed deals. They have long-time managers there making good, secure money. When you establish that failing is OK for so many years (we can argue the organization has been a stall-tactic since 2001) it is only human nature to go through the motions. Players come here and look like they have the fire that was missing, only to fade and join the rest of the malaise. Players get dealt from here and become much better/more successful players.

Pegula needs to turf Adams, as well as most of that front office staff: Jakubowski, Forton, Nightingale, Crowe, Karmanos, etc... Bring in someone with credibility and experience (my favorite idea is Poile), and allow them to build a winning program from the top-down. There would have to be full assurance of autonomy, a healthy budget, and NO preconditions that certain favorites are guaranteed jobs from the Sabres, Harborcenter, Jr Sabres, etc.

In that case, I would 1000% be on board with a full rebuild.


If it is President Adams, and GM Karmanos rebuilding this thing, count me out.
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,689
39,659
Rochester, NY
I said no because I thought the question was "do I think they will do it"

I support it, with the right environment.

In my opinion, what ails this franchise the most is an acceptance of losing. Dropping a game(s) or seasons is acceptable as long as you 'learn' from it and the owner feels like we are getting closer to the success that he feels is inevitable. People at the Keybank Center make a lot of money. Players make millions and have long, guaranteed deals. They have long-time managers there making good, secure money. When you establish that failing is OK for so many years (we can argue the organization has been a stall-tactic since 2001) it is only human nature to go through the motions. Players come here and look like they have the fire that was missing, only to fade and join the rest of the malaise. Players get dealt from here and become much better/more successful players.

Pegula needs to turf Adams, as well as most of that front office staff: Jakubowski, Forton, Nightingale, Crowe, Karmanos, etc... Bring in someone with credibility and experience (my favorite idea is Poile), and allow them to build a winning program from the top-down. There would have to be full assurance of autonomy, a healthy budget, and NO preconditions that certain favorites are guaranteed jobs from the Sabres, Harborcenter, Jr Sabres, etc.

In that case, I would 1000% be on board with a full rebuild.


If it is President Adams, and GM Karmanos rebuilding this thing, count me out.
Poile is 74yo and retired as the Preds GM and stayed on as an advisor in Nashville.

I would be surprised if he were looking to be a GM again, especially here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zman5778

May Day 10

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
739
432
St Catharines, ON
Poile is 74yo and retired as the Preds GM and stayed on as an advisor in Nashville.

I would be surprised if he were looking to be a GM again, especially here.

Not for GM. It would be a good sum of money (that he cant refuse) to access his credibility, knowledge, and rolodex.
He would install his own hierarchy/structure, hire a general manager, and delegate. After the front-end is completed, things should be pretty self-sufficient. He can show up to the games, count his money, whatever he wants.

It's largely a pipe-dream, but an example of what I would do if I were a billionaire owner. I saw the draft when he retired and how each team got to the podium and gushed about the guy. That's the credibility facelift this franchise desperately needs.

74, these days can still be a vibrant, working age. My bosses are all that age, and a few can kick my ass. Rick Dudley, a Sabres fan favorite is 75 and still going. And as I mentioned, he wouldnt be doing the day-to-day heavy lift of a GM, or even getting into the weeds of scouting and all that.
 

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,689
39,659
Rochester, NY
Not for GM. It would be a good sum of money (that he cant refuse) to access his credibility, knowledge, and rolodex.
He would install his own hierarchy/structure, hire a general manager, and delegate. After the front-end is completed, things should be pretty self-sufficient. He can show up to the games, count his money, whatever he wants.

It's largely a pipe-dream, but an example of what I would do if I were a billionaire owner. I saw the draft when he retired and how each team got to the podium and gushed about the guy. That's the credibility facelift this franchise desperately needs.

74, these days can still be a vibrant, working age. My bosses are all that age, and a few can kick my ass. Rick Dudley, a Sabres fan favorite is 75 and still going. And as I mentioned, he wouldnt be doing the day-to-day heavy lift of a GM, or even getting into the weeds of scouting and all that.
You vastly underestimate the work it takes to be a good NHL GM if you think it is that easy.
 

May Day 10

Registered User
Apr 19, 2006
739
432
St Catharines, ON
You vastly underestimate the work it takes to be a good NHL GM if you think it is that easy.

I dont think its easy to be GM at all. I said as much. Poile wont be GM due to the rigors and him having retired from that. He would choose the GM who would put in all that work.

Poile (in my never going to happen as long as Pegula is the owner scenario) would have a clean canvas. He would hire a GM. Him, and Id presume the GM would bring online their amateur, pro, and international scouting systems/departments. Hire the head of data, Hire the person to run strength and conditioning, training, nutrition. Even the equipment/lockerroom staff. Every facet.
Once everything is online, Poile's work is largely done. He can sit back and monitor from afar.
 
Last edited:

Jim Bob

RIP RJ
Feb 27, 2002
58,689
39,659
Rochester, NY
I dont think its easy to be GM at all. I said as much. Poile wont be GM due to the rigors and him having retired from that. He would choose the GM who would put in all that work.

Poile (in my never going to happen as long as Pegula is the owner scenario) would have a clean canvas. He would hire a GM. Him, and Id presume the GM would bring online their amateur, pro, and international scouting systems/departments. Hire the head of data, Hire the person to run strength and conditioning, training, nutrition. Even the equipment/lockerroom staff. Every facet.
Once everything is online, Poile's work is largely done. He can sit back and monitor from afar.
Even a President of Hockey Ops is way more than that.

And I don't see Poile as some wizard that would do that, walk away, and everything would go swimmingly.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad