If there was one movie you think everyone should see what would it be? | Page 4 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

If there was one movie you think everyone should see what would it be?

If you enjoy the Kill Bill type of movies, a bit of an under the radar pick is Shoot 'Em Up (2007), with Clive Owen, Paul Giamatti and Monica Bellucci. It takes the genre to the extreme, with a bit of an absurd comedic twist, and a play on the excessiveness of the genre in general. To say it is action packed is an understatement.
 
12 Angry Men

Is it my favorite movie of all time? No, is it in my top-10? Yes. The reason i picked it is because it just shows how little you actually need to make a movie that's great. In terms of production it could have been a stage play. The movie was made for under 4 000 000$ in todays money.
 
12 Angry Men

Is it my favorite movie of all time? No, is it in my top-10? Yes. The reason i picked it is because it just shows how little you actually need to make a movie that's great. In terms of production it could have been a stage play. The movie was made for under 4 000 000$ in todays money.
Excellent pick. I wish I'd thought of it. Besides being a great example of filmmaking, what it says about prejudice, jumping to conclusions and responsibility is something that anyone of any age or background could benefit from and apply in daily life. BTW, it was a stage play.
 
Do you really? ;)

(still waiting for your comment on Last Year at Marienbad!!)
Bumped it up to next on my list and got around to watching this one in 2 different sittings over the weekend. My first impression is that I regret that my French isn't nearly up to snuff to follow this movie without subtitles lol.

Very intriguing film for sure. It's interesting that we the viewers, as well as the characters, don't really quite know exactly what's going on in the big scheme. I tend to have an instinct of trying to figure out what's going to happen, and I realized pretty quickly that I'd have to turn that off for this one.

I found the overall vibe of the film is pretty entrancing from the unsettling vibes, the score, and the way the story is presented throughout. Great recommendation, but could be a tough watch for a lot of people.

I did some reading on the film afterwards in an attempt to "get" it (which quickly seemed like a fool's errand) and found the comments of the Alain Resnais to be pretty interesting. An in-depth interview with him made me abandon the idea of trying to "understand" the film with any level of certainty. Here's the interview if you're interested.

I've seen you mention it in other threads before and am glad you nudged me more to watch it. Will surely watch it again sometime in the future to see what other kind of interpretations I have.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Pranzo Oltranzista
Bumped it up to next on my list and got around to watching this one in 2 different sittings over the weekend. My first impression is that I regret that my French isn't nearly up to snuff to follow this movie without subtitles lol.

Very intriguing film for sure. It's interesting that we the viewers, as well as the characters, don't really quite know exactly what's going on in the big scheme. I tend to have an instinct of trying to figure out what's going to happen, and I realized pretty quickly that I'd have to turn that off for this one.

I found the overall vibe of the film is pretty entrancing from the unsettling vibes, the score, and the way the story is presented throughout. Great recommendation, but could be a tough watch for a lot of people.

I did some reading on the film afterwards in an attempt to "get" it (which quickly seemed like a fool's errand) and found the comments of the Alain Resnais to be pretty interesting. An in-depth interview with him made me abandon the idea of trying to "understand" the film with any level of certainty. Here's the interview if you're interested.

I've seen you mention it in other threads before and am glad you nudged me more to watch it. Will surely watch it again sometime in the future to see what other kind of interpretations I have.

If you try to understand the "story", you'll indeed spiral into infinity (which is not unpleasant). I think you need to understand the film as an "écriture". The interview posted was a fun read (thx!) - there's another interesting take from Robbe-Grillet (as much as I love Resnais and as I think he is a mastermind of cinema, I still think the film must be read first through Robbe-Grillet's signature) in this interview . It's in French (sorry), but he hints at the importance of understanding the film as a construction (and in this case, with a game at its core). He hints at it too in the interview you posted, saying: "The Cinema is a technique which displays itself. It is the unmasking of that technique which creates a truth." His books also must be approached with reflexivity and the writing process in mind, especially the Gradiva one, which is mostly a very dense intertext.

If you are ever curious, the 1974 adaptation of L'invenzione di Morel is also a great film and a very interesting variation on some of the same themes, but conceived in a more grounded sci-fi approach. It proposes a different path in interpretation for sure. The interview you posted brushes over some similarities, but I'm pretty sure it was confirmed that Robbe-Grillet used the novel as main inspiration for Marienbad.
 
Marathon Man with Hoffman and Olivier.

At Close Range with Christopher Walken and Sean Penn. Penn is excellent, but Walken leaves Penn in the dust. How Walken wasn't nominated for an Oscar is beyond me.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad