The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 29,187
- 38,857
Hes back 95 percent. Team has vastly improved and if u beat a team 4 in a row they r good..nj devils opponent. No reason not to bring him back.
lol what?
Hes back 95 percent. Team has vastly improved and if u beat a team 4 in a row they r good..nj devils opponent. No reason not to bring him back.
I agree with you on Chytil but what is that role? Mika and even Strome are really going to the extent that cutting their time for him seems questionable, especially while the playoffs are still somewhat possible though a very long shot.
I think the hardest part of his job to navigate is the toi. The fact is, there are too many players who are either too good not to play top minutes now or too important to the future not to be given ample room to grow. Half the forwards have to be bottom 6 toi players but there are only 3 guys on the team that really are that.
Buchnevich was 23 when Quinn got here. He wasn't the complete player he is today. Yes, Mika and Strome are both older, but both improved considerably while Quinn was coach. Does he get no credit for that?
The most obvious one to me is his new-ish notion of just letting PP1 play the full 2 minutes. I saw a stat a few weeks ago (so not sure if it is still 100% true) that PP1 hadn't scored a single goal in he final 45 seconds of a PP. It baffles me why he wouldn't have a regular second unit to get guys like Chytil, Buch, and the kids out there more regularly. I also think they need to make a decision about their top 2 centers. Chytil is too good to be a 13 minute 3rd/4th line center. If they aren't going to play their third line, then they need to make a choice about which two centers are going to be here long term between Zib, Strome, and Chytil. That's an easy choice to me, particularly after factoring in age and cap hits, but Gorton seems to want to fiddle while his only young C is stuck in limbo. If they don't want to make a choice just yet, then I would split up Panarin and Strome, put out Laf/Zib/Buch, Panarin/Chytil/Kakko, and Kreider/Strome/Kravtsov as the top three lines and roll them evenly through the game, with a bump to one of the three if they are particularly on that night. If you ran those three lines like that and gave PP2 a consistent 45 seconds per penalty, than suddenly you have a clear top 9 getting similar minutes with one 4th line (rather than two top lines--one of which has fourth liners on the RW all season--and two bottom lines as far as minutes).
Can we try this in cohesive sentences please?Hes back 95 percent. Team has vastly improved and if u beat a team 4 in a row they r good..nj devils opponent. No reason not to bring him back.
There is no decision to be made with 6 games left and being 4 points out of a playoff spot. That is not about making a decision or not making one. This is about going all in for wins.The most obvious one to me is his new-ish notion of just letting PP1 play the full 2 minutes. I saw a stat a few weeks ago (so not sure if it is still 100% true) that PP1 hadn't scored a single goal in he final 45 seconds of a PP. It baffles me why he wouldn't have a regular second unit to get guys like Chytil, Buch, and the kids out there more regularly. I also think they need to make a decision about their top 2 centers. Chytil is too good to be a 13 minute 3rd/4th line center. If they aren't going to play their third line, then they need to make a choice about which two centers are going to be here long term between Zib, Strome, and Chytil. That's an easy choice to me, particularly after factoring in age and cap hits, but Gorton seems to want to fiddle while his only young C is stuck in limbo. If they don't want to make a choice just yet, then I would split up Panarin and Strome, put out Laf/Zib/Buch, Panarin/Chytil/Kakko, and Kreider/Strome/Kravtsov as the top three lines and roll them evenly through the game, with a bump to one of the three if they are particularly on that night. If you ran those three lines like that and gave PP2 a consistent 45 seconds per penalty, than suddenly you have a clear top 9 getting similar minutes with one 4th line (rather than two top lines--one of which has fourth liners on the RW all season--and two bottom lines as far as minutes).
Buchnevich was 23 when Quinn got here. He wasn't the complete player he is today. Yes, Mika and Strome are both older, but both improved considerably while Quinn was coach. Does he get no credit for that?
This whole insisting the coach get credit for something they have little control of beyond giving the player the opportunity to succeed is something relatively new.
He gets as much credit as every previous coach received for player improvement which is... some?
This whole insisting the coach get credit for something they have little control of beyond giving the player the opportunity to succeed is something relatively new.
This. Let’s not be the Oilers. Don’t put prospects in positions they are not ready for and hand them ice time that is over their capacity. I don’t love Quinn but I think he’s done a pretty good job with the prospects since most of them have improved over the season.I think what the Quinnbros (whatever that means) would tell you is, just giving a young player more ice time (that they don't deserve or didn't earn) doesn't mean that player is going to automatically score more points. Paint it however you want, Laff was not good, at all, to start the season. And that's ok. You're starting to see flashes of the player he can be. Truthfully, Quinn should have sat him for a few games earlier in the season, that's how bad he was. Kravtsov hasn't even played 15 NHL games yet, why are you sweating his production? He came here in the final month of the season where every game is huge and his done better than expected. We're talking about 18/19/20 year old kids playing in the best league in the world. On top of that, they're going against guys like Crosby, Malkin, Ovechkin, Backstrom, and Marchant every other night. Let them find their footing.
There's absolutely nothing wrong with teaching/demanding they learn how to play a complete game. Throwing kids out there who is in over his head or when the situation is too big for him is how you ruin a prospect. I have zero concerns about Laff, Kakko, and to a lesser extent Kravtsov. They're going to be very good for this team.
The PP tbing was a huge, huge problem but I’m not sure how much it was coaching. A lot of the time PP1 would be out so much because they absolutely dominated possession. There were times Quinn could snd should have changed that he didn’t but it wasn’t always a coaching decision. It does seem to be mostly rectified now however it happened though, PP2 has been out more snd converted a few times in my memory.The most obvious one to me is his new-ish notion of just letting PP1 play the full 2 minutes. I saw a stat a few weeks ago (so not sure if it is still 100% true) that PP1 hadn't scored a single goal in he final 45 seconds of a PP. It baffles me why he wouldn't have a regular second unit to get guys like Chytil, Buch, and the kids out there more regularly. I also think they need to make a decision about their top 2 centers. Chytil is too good to be a 13 minute 3rd/4th line center. If they aren't going to play their third line, then they need to make a choice about which two centers are going to be here long term between Zib, Strome, and Chytil. That's an easy choice to me, particularly after factoring in age and cap hits, but Gorton seems to want to fiddle while his only young C is stuck in limbo. If they don't want to make a choice just yet, then I would split up Panarin and Strome, put out Laf/Zib/Buch, Panarin/Chytil/Kakko, and Kreider/Strome/Kravtsov as the top three lines and roll them evenly through the game, with a bump to one of the three if they are particularly on that night. If you ran those three lines like that and gave PP2 a consistent 45 seconds per penalty, than suddenly you have a clear top 9 getting similar minutes with one 4th line (rather than two top lines--one of which has fourth liners on the RW all season--and two bottom lines as far as minutes).
This. Let’s not be the Oilers. Don’t put prospects in positions they are not ready for and hand them ice time that is over their capacity. I don’t love Quinn but I think he’s done a pretty good job with the prospects since most of them have improved over the season.
The PP tbing was a huge, huge problem but I’m not sure how much it was coaching. A lot of the time PP1 would be out so much because they absolutely dominated possession. There were times Quinn could snd should have changed that he didn’t but it wasn’t always a coaching decision. It does seem to be mostly rectified now however it happened though, PP2 has been out more snd converted a few times in my memory.
They definitely need to make a decision on center but the deadline passed now and it’s too late to change that. The way they went about Stromes contract makes me think they want Chytil to take that 2C spot long term, but for now it’s 3 top 6 centers for 2 spots and 2 of them are putting up crazy production
Yeah dude ‘cause like 75% of that talent can’t even buy beer yet.Isn't that the point? We have great individual talent. We see great individual performances. What we do as a team is well below average imo.
Our roster talent is absurd..
“On paper...” here just means “Panarin, Zibanejad, Fox...ok, I’m good. [back to HFBoards]”No we aren't. We have a greater collection of talent, but that doesn't make us a better team. A large portion of that talent has yet to hit their stride.
Yeah dude ‘cause like 75% of that talent can’t even buy beer yet.
This team is barely finished incubating. They’re not even close to their prime years.
If people insist on blaming the coach for lack of development, it only seems fair to give him credit when players do develop.