Amateur on paper only.I'm glad I can watch my favourite NHL team like usual and tune into some Olympics at the same time personally. The hockey side is suffering for sure but that's ok because the NHL is still going without a break.
Also, nice to watch athletes that aren't winning the lottery jackpot salary wise every year they play do their thing knowing how much they must have trained for it.
I guess I'm old and maybe I'm not remembering correctly but I feel like when I was a kid the Olympics were all amateur athletes.
So non-hockey enjoying the Olympics, hockey enjoying NHL. Don't care that the NHL isn't there tbh.
Are you seriously kidding me?Business versus Sports.
It's a question of how you define amateur, and I believe at the Olympic level, historically, there were always questions and debates. For hockey, it might be easier to define a "professional" and work backward. Eg, make a short list of leagues, NHL, KHL, SEL, etc., and declare that once a player plays in one of those leagues, he is a professional and can never be considered an amateur for the purpose of the Olympics.Amateurs only? How would that work?
This is business vs much bigger business. Nothing else. Sports has nothing to do with it.
It's a question of how you define amateur, and I believe at the Olympic level, historically, there were always questions and debates. For hockey, it might be easier to define a "professional" and work backward. Eg, make a short list of leagues, NHL, KHL, SEL, etc., and declare that once a player plays in one of those leagues, he is a professional and can never be considered an amateur for the purpose of the Olympics.
There are national programs in many countries for many sports. It's not an issue. You could declare that players in US college, US development and CHL all qualify as amateurs, regardless of whether or not they are getting paid. You draw the line with professional leagues. This is just as an example.Then there would be other national programs in place where athletes would be supported one way or another. For example: Most German athletes at the Olympics (that aren't hockey players) are either sport-soldiers or policeman.
This is about money and power. Not hockey.What do you mean? Hockey is a sport – you know, two teams trying to score more goals into the opponent's net. That little detail may have escaped you if you only see $$$ everywhere.
Same for me. I despise nationalism. I suppose it comes down to education – the culture in which you grow up. If you grow up in a culture that suggests there's nothing more valuable in life than money, then, of course, the NHL will be more important to you than the Olympics. But if you grow up in a culture (as I did) suggesting there's no greater honor than representing your country on the international stage (and I assure you that has nothing to do with nationalism – after all, internationalism was part of the official Communist ideology), then you will naturally value Olympics, and the World Championships, over any competition of city clubs.
I think that's what the "amateurs only" crowd is after. They want two teams to play in the olympics for medals and don't want to be crippled by the NHL lockout.Amateurs only? How would that work?
In such a circumstance only USA and Canada would be able to field teams, and those guys would need to be juniors/college guys.
If the NHL does not participate in 2022, which format do you prefer?
Uhm..this tournament sucks so let's make it suck more?If NHL players are not allowed to participate in the Olympics in 2022 then the IIHF and IOC should make it an U-23 tournament, just like the soccer tournament in the summer Olympics.
The ongoing tournament and it’s format rally suucks. I’m begging you mister Fasel! Please do something!
If NHL players are not allowed to participate in the Olympics in 2022 then the IIHF and IOC should make it an U-23 tournament, just like the soccer tournament in the summer Olympics.
The ongoing tournament and it’s format rally suucks. I’m begging you mister Fasel! Please do something!