I don’t think it is. I think a new coach coming in and trying more of the kids and just easing up on the hard defensive zone usage of the bottom 6 and a shake up on the system would cause positive changes. The problem with Sullivan is he still can’t figure out what won the 2 cups and thinks his system was it, when it was the change from Bylsma-MJ-Him and some quick JR moves. I don’t think we have a bad roster at all. I think a few players that deserve to sit are playing because the coach panders to the core and vets , that’s on the coach.
I understand what you're saying, but every coach in the NHL uses essentially the same system these days. It's not like before where a couple teams trapped like hell, a few others were run and gun, or anything like that.
They all use a similar forecheck and neutral zone approach. The difference is in aggression. Some forecheck like hell and punish you. Others sit back.
That's why personnel matters so much and why it's no longer feasible to have a fourth line where you can just bury guys. They have to be able to contribute.
I think this franchise is caught in between what it wants to do and what its roster is capable of doing. It had success being an aggressive forechecking team. The more it could spend time in the offensive zone by hounding the opposing defense and starting a cycle, the less time it had to defend its own zone where their individual weaknesses would show.
The Penguins do not have that ability to forecheck consistently. Crosby and Malkin are still good, but they're not quite as strong on the puck as they were six years ago. They're not quite as fast to loose pucks. Add in that Guentzel has been routinely muscled off pucks this year and that Rust is playing extraordinarily soft, and your top two lines are ironically the most talented they've been in years but also the easiest to play against they've been in years.
The bottom six poses little CONSISTENT offensive threat. Carter's issues are well-documented. He's aged rapidly. McGinn can be effective but he needs support. Blueger has been very soft - he hasn't been the same since his jaw injury, and he's clearly in his head offensively.
DOC and Poehling show flashes and are solid forecheckers, but they struggle with some of the details in their own zone, as evidenced by the goal Karlsson scored tonight where Poehling was caught watching. Archibald is what he is. And Heinen has top six skills with bottom six consistency. At best he should be the scoring option on an otherwise physical two-way third line.
So, you say, if they can't be aggressive, why not play passive? Because the stars can't do it. They've never been able to be the team that traps, that sits back and lulls the other team to sleep. Johnston tried it and it damn near ruined Sid and Geno. And that was in their prime.
People will point to Boston and the fact that their old guys are one of the best defensive teams in the league. And it's true. But Sid and Geno have never been Bergeron and Krejci. Even Marchand is willing to focus on defense.
The Penguins stars will play defensively ONLY if they can do it in a way that allows them to continue being explosive offensively. That's why they need better support. If the top six is going to be more finesse like it's currently conducted, then the bottom six needs to forecheck like hell and wear the opposition down on a nightly basis.
This is why I stand by this being a personnel, not a coaching issue. And, honestly, if I thought there were options in WBS, I'd be criticizing Sullivan a lot more for his player usage. But there's nothing down there. We try and talk ourselves in to Puustinen or Nylander, but they're not what this team needs nor are they really busting the door down demanding NHL minutes.