There is 3 options to vote. He should have made 3 x threads no ?Shit has been discussed to death in the draft thread, but hey, let's make another draft related thread.
There is 3 options to vote. He should have made 3 x threads no ?Shit has been discussed to death in the draft thread, but hey, let's make another draft related thread.
this . Best option "if" Ottawa want him hard . Sennecke at 7 would be great. He's very good hands and can do things even alone against 3 players. He has grow very fast of 4-5 inches. Now, he will takes muscles mass and will be a force. I am the first (and surely the last oneI heard bad stuff about him but don't know for sure. If he's there at 5, I am calling around see if team like Ottawa is interested in trading up. Still get Catton or Sennecke at 7. Gain another late first. To be combined with Jets pick for good young player.
Reinbacher is so underrated on this board. The kid is a stud and will be for a decade plus for us.
That was the last draft where it was supposedly so stacked with d-men. Kind of a similar draft.ok, you chose a draft from 12 years ago. Why would the same thing happen again?
I like losing 2-1, don’t you?We should draft only defensemen
Lindstrom has kappo kakko written all over no thanks, ill stick to demigod or Iginla
Whats the justification for this?I think Buium will be the best d-man in this class . . . and by a fair amount.
I don't see Mailloux not being a top 4 NHL defenseman.If we take Levshunov, there doesn't seem to be a need to trade Reinbacher or Mailloux, as we're not sure Mailloux will be a top 4 dman at the NHL level.
Overall I stay away from saying which player we should draft over whom. But, I think it's a dangerous game to draft for need. It takes serious talent and ability to win a cup. So I would go for projected talent and ability at the draft, and then use trades to address need.
Based on what?Lindstrom has kappo kakko written all over no thanks
I can see it. He’s a fluid skater, great outlet pass, is actually really good at jumping in the rush or ozone dating back to his rookie year in Kloten. Add to the fact that even though he doesn’t go looking for physical, he plays a physical brand of hockeyYes. I see Heiskanen more and more in Reinbacher game. But it's maybe just me who see that.
Lolthis . Best option "if" Ottawa want him hard . Sennecke at 7 would be great. He's very good hands and can do things even alone against 3 players. He has grow very fast of 4-5 inches. Now, he will takes muscles mass and will be a force. I am the first (and surely the last one) to say he's gonna be a Jean Béliveau
He’s the anti-Rudy. Gotta be @Habs approved.I wonder if Reinbacher even cracks top 10 in this year's draft with all this blueline talent? I would take this kid if he's there, hard to pass on him
Don’t think Levshunov is the consensus top D like many here do. You could make an argument for any of he, Silayev, Buium, Parekh or Dickinson.
My gut says we’re going to pick Iginla.
Examples of Habs drafting for need in the first round :Yep trading for need has never worked out for this organization. You draft BPA which leverages the GM in many ways including the ability to trade that player for a real need.
I am Jack’s itchy thread starting thumb.Shit has been discussed to death in the draft thread, but hey, let's make another draft related thread.
Examples of Habs drafting for need in the first round :
Galchenyuk, McCarron, Kotkaniemi, Mailloux, Poehling, Tinordi.
Examples of Habs apparently drafting with BPA in mind : Caufield, Guhle, Slaf, Sherbak, Hutson (not 1st round but clear bpa pick), Beaulieu.