It's a number of things.My biggest question is where is our structure?
Why do we always look lost?
Carolina just lost half their back end, and didnt miss a beat.
Why do our teams always have no structure and players always look lost. Is it bad coaching, poor listening, players not wanting to change? All of the above? I dont get it.
I truly dont get it. We never play at a higher level than we should. We play like sand and rocks are stuck in our gears.
We have alot of talent. We get the bare minimum out of it night in and night out. Where other teams get the most out of less.
I kind of agree with you, but I see another side of it.
I do like the young pieces we've compiled and getting rid of the vets will get a lot of stink off the team, and allow us to put together a new identity.
At the same time, watching this team without Panarin last night, holy f*** they have NOOOOO talent. Handing the keys to Cuylle and Chytil isn't going to be it. They need significant pieces coming in. Guys that will keep Cuylle and Chytil as role players. Probably a 1C and at least two top 4 defensemen.
Where is that coming from?
I think there is more to that. Our players are never in a good position to receive the puck. When i watch it almost seems like each player has no clue where his teammates will be. That definitely affects the ability to make clean passes, quickly and decisively.2) If you can't move the puck from point A to point B, you can't do anything. This organization is absolutely in love with defensemen who can't handle the puck and almost all of the offensive players mentioned in the point above are terrible at passing. I'm not saying everyone needs to be Kucherov or get a bunch of assists. It's the subtle ability to move the puck through the neutral zone. Chytil has it. Every other forward sucks wind at it besides Panarin.
It's both...the team has zero structure, which in itself is asinine after they begged to be coached up after the last coach was too laissez faire with them. Then the new coach comes in with a 1-3-1 scheme that yields immediate positive results, only to completely abandon it with zero explanation a year later.This isnt a skill thing, its a team thing.
Zibanejad is your #1 C, supposed to be a 2way guy, makes 8.5M.We have seen that same effort on a back check from Panarin, Laf, Vinnie etc. Happens numerous times every game. They are all lazy and dont give a f***.
I don't think the Rangers had more structure, they just had a better roster, and they rode all the usual things new heights. They were a mediocre 5v5 team with one working line (that happened to have a top 5 player in the world on it, shockingly), dominant special teams, and great goaltending.It's both...the team has zero structure, which in itself is asinine after they begged to be coached up after the last coach was too laissez faire with them. Then the new coach comes in with a 1-3-1 scheme that yields immediate positive results, only to completely abandon it with zero explanation a year later.
However, it's apparent, especially when you see them without Panarin, that they are not an overly talented group. Combined with the fact they're refusing to exert any energy, the results are pretty ugly.
Regardless if it was entirely on Lavi or not, as a team they seem committed to a strong defensive game with the forwards working hard in their own end. Panarin's overall improvement from the year before was definitely a huge factor.I don't think the Rangers had more structure, they just had a better roster, and they rode all the usual things new heights. They were a mediocre 5v5 team with one working line (that happened to have a top 5 player in the world on it, shockingly), dominant special teams, and great goaltending.
I think the Laviolette bump was really overexaggerated last year. The main difference between the 2022-23 group and the 23-24 group, to my eyes, was a) swapping Nemeth with Gustafsson and b) Panarin having another MVP tier bounceback after being the object of a ton of scrutiny and criticism (baldnarin really changed the game). Not to mention the difference between Halak's 0-4 start and Quick's first go-round with the team. Some huge improvements around the edges and a career season from your best player = 7 points in the standings.
You're right on Nemeth lol, I can't even remember who 3LD was the next year, but point is Gus was a HUGE improvement in that spot, even as a PP2 guy.Regardless if it was entirely on Lavi or not, as a team they seem committed to a strong defensive game with the forwards working hard in their own end. Panarin's overall improvement from the year before was definitely a huge factor.
However, Nemeth was gone after the '22 playoffs. IMO, we screwed up by not keeping Mikkola instead of Lindgren after the '23 first round exit.
They certainly got looser as the season went on...it started when Fox went out of the lineup. Then Igor had his mid season lull.You're right on Nemeth lol, I can't even remember who 3LD was the next year, but point is Gus was a HUGE improvement in that spot, even as a PP2 guy.
I still think they were pretty dysfunctional and loose defensively, as much as they've always been.
They ranked 28th in Rush xGA last season according to Valliquette. 22nd in 22-23, 15th in 21-22.
The team actually looked really good when lindgren and trouba were out.They certainly got looser as the season went on...it started when Fox went out of the lineup. Then Igor had his mid season lull.
Trouba was awful even before he broke his ankle & the wheels began falling off Lindgren once Fox got hurt. The writing was really on the wall for them long before this season started.
System, culture, coaching. This team feels like one where management has told the players, "You guys are professionals and we trust you. Whatever decision you make, stands. We're hands-off here." The last like, 3 coaching staffs have apparently been that - "Player's coaches." Just let the players police and manage themselves. "He's not an Xs and Os coach, he's a player's coach." Maybe it's time to get an Xs and Os coach for once. But these "player's coaches" are who management keeps hiring. It's like that scene in Mean Girls or whatever movie. "I'm not a regular mom, I'm a *cool* mom" except here it's "I'm not a regular coach, i'm a *cool* coach."My biggest question is where is our structure?
Why do we always look lost?
Carolina just lost half their back end, and didnt miss a beat.
Why do our teams always have no structure and players always look lost. Is it bad coaching, poor listening, players not wanting to change? All of the above? I dont get it.
I truly dont get it. We never play at a higher level than we should. We play like sand and rocks are stuck in our gears.
We have alot of talent. We get the bare minimum out of it night in and night out. Where other teams get the most out of less.
This has been a problem for the Rangers for decades. As I've mentioned before, the problem is organizational. These are things that should be taught at the AHL and lower levels until they become second nature. However, the Rangers are not a TEAM. They are a collection of individuals thrown together willy-nilly and are expected to be successful. They rarely draft or sign players to fill specific needs. Look at our hated enemies the Pens and Bruins....I recall both teams at one point lost more than half of their d-men....yet they both were able to bring up AHLers who stepped in seamlessly because they were taught in the minors what was expected of them if they were ever called up. I can't think of one instance where this happened on the Rangers.Watching other teams, players pass to open ice where they know a player will be and can skate into it. They support one another. There is structure u can see.
System, culture, coaching. This team feels like one where management has told the players, "You guys are professionals and we trust you. Whatever decision you make, stands. We're hands-off here." The last like, 3 coaching staffs have apparently been that - "Player's coaches." Just let the players police and manage themselves. "He's not an Xs and Os coach, he's a player's coach." Maybe it's time to get an Xs and Os coach for once. But these "player's coaches" are who management keeps hiring. It's like that scene in Mean Girls or whatever movie. "I'm not a regular mom, I'm a *cool* mom" except here it's "I'm not a regular coach, i'm a *cool* coach."
The system is whatever the player's decide. That's why it always looks so disjointed and as if they don't have a cohesive plan - Because they don't. Because it's 10 different bits of plans mushed together instead of one proper coach instilling a proper system. It's why teams like Carolina don't miss a beat and always look like an actual team. They have one guy directing the team on what they're supposed to do. NYR let their players freelance and wonder where things could possibly be going wrong.
Catching other games over the years, one thing always stuck out to me when comparing NYR to other teams: Puck management. This team has NO puck management and usually very little puck awareness. Other top teams are crisp and definitive when handling the puck - shooting, passing, carrying. This team is ALWAYS so f***ing lackadaisical when it comes to puck control. Soft, weak handles. Sloppy, inaccurate passing. Little confidence to carry the puck. Little puck support. Little awareness of where the puck is, and where they are in relation to the puck/play.
Marvel Heroes of Pond Hockey
Panarin is his counterpart, Tony Starks.Kreider is the Captain America of backhand pass turnovers at the blue line.
Agreed, they played some of their best hockey with those two out.The team actually looked really good when lindgren and trouba were out.
But as soon as he was healthy enough to skate he was reinserted.
Ruhwedel, not Mika, turned over the puck on the first goal last night. That doesn't excuse a cooked Stamkos beating Mika down the rink after the turnover.It doesnt get talked about as an issue as much regarding players as it did when I was younger, but the Rangers have an insane amount of floaters and gliders. Mika on the backcheck yesterday on the first goal. He turns it over, doesnt hustle back, Ruhwedel is outnumbered and the puck is in the net. Chris Glider is another culprit. Panarin does it, but at least he produces I guess. our defenseman float around the zone. No urgency. Miller, Fox, Lindgren all do it. The coach is stuck looking for answers when a clear one if that guys dont move their feet at all. Why is that hard to see?
I'm willing to give Vaakanainen a little bit of a honeymoon period. First goal last night was dumb puck luck. On the first goal, he actually got his stick in there to break up the pass but the puck went right back to a Pred.