Nah, it was a warning that my post was long as shit...I tried to do a shorter TLDR synopsisDid you really TLDR to Hank's post and then go on and make your own post about 3 times as long?
Nah, it was a warning that my post was long as shit...I tried to do a shorter TLDR synopsisDid you really TLDR to Hank's post and then go on and make your own post about 3 times as long?
We'll whaddya know, I had let myself be told that 1st Amendment = ~Freedom of Speech and not much else. Thanks.It is a First Amendment issue. Not necessarily the freedom of speech aspect (though there's certainly an argument that could be made there), but more of a freedom of assembly aspect.
They have a right to "come together and collectively express, promote, pursue, and defend their collective or shared ideas."
Everybody loves to argue about AR-pattern rifles. I get it, they look sexy. If we cared about reducing the homicide rate, or even the firearm homicide rate, instead of destroying a symbol of violence/defending a symbol of freedom, we'd be debating the merits of keeping cheap, shitty Glock knockoffs out of the hands of young men with a history of violent behavior.Lastly, the vast majority of both homicides and suicides are handgun deaths.
We'll whaddya know, I had let myself be told that 1st Amendment = ~Freedom of Speech and not much else. Thanks.
Well f*** you too, Melanie Griffith!
Oh yeah? Which country is going to pretend we have weapons of mass destruction, invade us with a massively superior military, remove our government, completely upend all civil society, arrest everyone competent from the ruling party that might be able to help with a transition, and then pay for the creation of religious based militias?
Come on, now. You've got better arguments than that.
Everybody loves to argue about AR-pattern rifles. I get it, they look sexy. If we cared about reducing the homicide rate, or even the firearm homicide rate, instead of destroying a symbol of violence/defending a symbol of freedom, we'd be debating the merits of keeping cheap, shitty Glock knockoffs out of the hands of young men with a history of violent behavior.
We as a nation are very different though, a black, latinx or LGBTQwhatever person lives a very different life than the majority of cis white people in America. And it’s usually not by choice.Our schools should be teaching that despite our barbaric past- we've moved far beyond that in a very short period of time- and should be preaching unity instead of fixating on what makes us different and "special".
100% agree with this.The ugliness should be taught, yes. But not to the exclusion of all else.
We as a nation are very different though, a black, latinx or LGBTQwhatever person lives a very different life than the majority of cis white people in America. And it’s usually not by choice.
Workplace, financial, authoritative and multitudes of other race based discrimination are all very real things that still exist and impact millions of Americans lives daily. The way to fix it is to point it out, teach the next generation that it’s wrong and not acceptable. One of the easiest ways to do that is by pointing out the atrocities committed by those who were here before us. How’s that old quote go?
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,”
I was at the gun shop a few weeks ago and a group of off duty deputies were making racist and antisemitic jokes so loud that the owner had to come tell them to take it down a notch. Not stop, just lower the volume so as not to potentially upset any of his other customers. I’m glad my very Jewish wife decided to sit in the car while I was in there.
Racism, antisemitism and plenty of other forms of religious and race based discrimination is very much still an issue for millions of Americans and not talking or teaching about it isn’t going to make it any better.
100% agree with this.
Just out of curiosity... was it a he, a she, white, black or what?
It depresses me how commonplace this has become since I sat through the vigil service the day after he VT shooting when I was a student.
Plenty of other countries have mental illness problems. We're the only one that has these mass shootings. It's the guns. Maybe bringing back the assault weapons ban that expired pretty much exactly when the explosion in mass shootings started would be an idea?A focus on treatment of mental illness, instead of celebrating it, would help.
Why not bothPlenty of other countries have mental illness problems. We're the only one that has these mass shootings. It's the guns. Maybe bringing back the assault weapons ban that expired pretty much exactly when the explosion in mass shootings started would be an idea?
I have no issue with that except not sure how you get them all back. There are millions in homes all over the country.Sure
But start with the ban.
I’m not sure there’s evidence to suggest the assault weapons ban did anything to curb gun violence.Plenty of other countries have mental illness problems. We're the only one that has these mass shootings. It's the guns. Maybe bringing back the assault weapons ban that expired pretty much exactly when the explosion in mass shootings started would be an idea?
Not sure we celebrate as much as ignore them.A focus on treatment of mental illness, instead of celebrating it, would help.
I’m not sure there’s evidence to suggest the assault weapons ban did anything to curb gun violence.
As always … I could be wrong.
PS - as non-partisan as possible, I ask a question: didn’t the democrats have both houses of Congress and the President for 2 full years?
Over time with attrition and police work. If you can't take them to the range and shoot them without getting them confiscated, and maybe there's some sort of trade in credit for a legal rifle, you'll bring the numbers down over time.I have no issue with that except not sure how you get them all back. There are millions in homes all over the country.
You saw where I said millions. Very few Leo’s will be keen on confiscating legally obtained rifles. It is a huge problem we should have addressed years ago. A buy back would be the best chance but they generally have had mediocre results in the past.Over time with attrition and police work. If you can't take them to the range and shoot them without getting them confiscated, and maybe there's some sort of trade in credit for a legal rifle, you'll bring the numbers down over time.
Cash 4 ClunkersI have no issue with that except not sure how you get them all back. There are millions in homes all over the country.
Well … it wasn’t repealed. Also, someone posted elsewhere about total homicides with “assault weapons” (that’s in quotes for a reason) and the % is very very low. Anyways. No one’s minds are being changed.The red line on that chart I posted earlier was when the ban was repealed.
It would get some back for sure. I believe that timeline is pretty accurate in the chart. A lot of those guns bought after the ban expired went in closets and never get used. You would get most of those back I think.Cash 4 Clunkers
But with guns
I'd also tax the everliving shit out of ammunition. You might not be able to eliminate the guns, but you sure as heck could squeeze the supply of bullets dryIt would get some back for sure. I believe that timeline is pretty accurate in the chart. A lot of those guns bought after the ban expired went in closets and never get used. You would get most of those back I think.