Toggle sidebar

Rumor: Hurricanes could look to flip Rantanen if he doesn’t extend by the deadline

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Chan790 said:
There is so much wrong with this post, I don't know where to start. Let's go in order. Bullet points.
  • Ron Francis hasn't been the Carolina GM since May 2018.
  • Necas and Drury had both made it clear they were not staying past their current contracts. They lost one year of team control on Necas.
  • Trading for Rantanen was likely the best trade return the Canes were getting for Necas. Part of that was the baked-in risk assumed that he might go UFA.
  • Aho is signed through 2031-32.
  • The Canes have one of the best-run scouting departments in the NHL and as a result, one of the better and deepest prospect pools in the NHL despite not having a top-10 pick since Andrei Svechnikov in 2018.
I think we'll be fine.
Click to expand...
correct on everything but the Drury point, he never gave an indicator about any kind of long-term moves.
 
Cans:

Rakell
Rangers 1st
Poulin

For

Pens:

Rantanen

Canes gets a player that can actually be on their roster for a couple more seasons. And can be 30-40 goal scorer. Plus they save face by getting a first in return.

Pens take the risk of Rantanen not returning, but Crosby gets marquee winger and the superstar they’ll need after the trio is finished. Yes, again risky, but they need to take it. That 14-21 overall pick though necessary, is not in Crosby’s 2 year plan
 
This whole thing is unbelievably funny lol. (No offense Canes fans, you guys deserve better)

Trading for this guy without assurances that he would sign an extension was always a massive gamble.

If I’m Carolina I’m keeping him and hoping for the best. (A cup)
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaWa, Chan790 and Clint Eastwood
HawksDub89 said:
Trading for this guy without assurances that he would sign an extension was always a massive gamble.
Click to expand...

Absolutely, or at least paying a fair price for Rantanen as a rental.

I think the problem starts with the fact that teams can no longer have conditional trade pieces based on a player extending (or not) with his new team.

So knowing that the Canes were put into a position (I can only assume) that they had to pay a price more than what just a rental would cost in case Rantanen extended. Because if he does extend, then the cost was probably fair?

Ultimately, Carolina never should have done this deal without either insisting they talk with Rantanen's agent ahead of the trade to discuss an extension or if not, told Colorado that without that they're only paying for a "rental" and nothing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gab6511, Winger98 and DaveG
I think Florida will take a swing for him. They have enough space at $5.2MM I believe so no real need there have a 3rd party retain on him.
 
jonlin said:
I assume Lundell is an absolute no-starter for Panthers. Signed for 5M through 2030. It a bargain contract for a 2C and Im betting he is not available for a rental.
Click to expand...
Unless it's Bennett (I think he's the UFA right?) then any deal likely has to be for an extended Rantanen otherwise yeah there isn't much Florida would be able to offer that Carolina would want.
 
Putt Pirate said:
I think Florida will take a swing for him. They have enough space at $5.2MM I believe so no real need there have a 3rd party retain on him.
Click to expand...
Assuming he'd be willing to do a sign & trade, what could Florida realistically offer for a signed Rantanen. It would be a lot.
 
I think a big question is here is whether other teams already have permission to talk to Rantanen’s camp about an extension (or not).

It sounds like Colorado had granted something like that to Carolina before the original trade happened. Did other teams also get this privilege then too?

But I can’t imagine Rantanen will get more than the Guentzel-ish trade package if he is only going as a rental.

And even if a team does get permission to talk to him first—neither the acquiring team nor Rantanen would have incentive to tell Carolina that he is willing to re-sign with the new club. The team that acquires him before the deadline can sign him to the 8-year term without Carolina’s help. And if you are the player, why weaken the team you are going to any more than you have to?

Just so messy on Carolina’s part. It feels like they’ve really backed themselves into a corner with not many good solutions left.
 
I don't see what Florida could possibly offer.

Verhaeghe has a full NMC and if Carolina is flipping Rantanen because they couldn't sign him, why would they take on another upcoming UFA in Bennett?

And Lundell is probably intriguing, but without knowing that Bennett is staying, why would Florida flip him? I suppose if they come to terms with both Rantanen and Bennett before the trade, they could dangle him...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaWa, Gizmo Tkachuk, Idiot Stick and 1 other person
For Florida the only piece of interest is Lundell. If he’s not on the table I’d rather just keep him unless Florida is giving their next 4 1st round picks whenever they have them
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
spockBokk said:
I think that was a reference to Drury’s trade request a few seasons ago. I don’t think he had any demands to leave after they started to give him regular playing time. He still would have been an RFA at the expiration of his current contract.

Sucks to have given him up potentially for nothing on top of Necas as well.
Click to expand...
Yeah that’s how I saw that too. He played a hand to get the playing time he should’ve been getting already. I never thought he was leaving anytime soon other than like this. An underated negative aspect of this for the Canes was that between KK and Drury they had an extra bottom six center - so they could add one in a trade. Drury being cheaper and consistent at the role made him a valuable throw in on any deal. We don’t really have much that’s expendable and still worth something right now. I think Drury had more trade value than Roslovic does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
GIN ANTONIC said:
For Florida the only piece of interest is Lundell. If he’s not on the table I’d rather just keep him unless Florida is giving their next 4 1st round picks whenever they have them
Click to expand...

Assuming Florida has an extension in place with Bennett and can get one with Rantanen:

To Florida: Rantanen + Kotkaniemi ($9.445M)
To Carolina: Lundell + Samoskevich ($5.925M)

Florida keeps loading up with Rantanen and gets a replacement 3C.

Carolina gets a really good young player who's signed that can push Staal down to 3C, a good young winger, and ~3.5M of cap space to go out and get a Ryan Donato or someone like that.
 
StickShift said:
It sounds like Colorado had granted something like that to Carolina before the original trade happened. Did other teams also get this privilege then too?
Click to expand...
No, it was specifically reported that Colorado did not allow Carolina to discuss a potential extension with Rantanen before the trade. They took a giant swing, and it might become a huge miss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche, StickShift and DaveG
DackellDuck said:
Assuming Florida has an extension in place with Bennett and can get one with Rantanen:

To Florida: Rantanen + Kotkaniemi ($9.445M)
To Carolina: Lundell + Samoskevich ($5.925M)

Florida keeps loading up with Rantanen and gets a replacement 3C.

Carolina gets a really good young player who's signed that can push Staal down to 3C, a good young winger, and ~3.5M of cap space to go out and get a Ryan Donato or someone like that.
Click to expand...
I think an extended Rantanen fetches quite a bit more than that. Adding Kotkaniemi into the trade makes it weird
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG and TheBigLetowski
GIN ANTONIC said:
I think an extended Rantanen fetched more than that
Click to expand...

Sure, but at this point in the season, how many teams would Rantanen be willing to extend with? He could very well say it's either Florida or UFA... at which point the Hurricanes are in a tough spot.

Do you lose him and try to re-use the cap in free-agency, or try to get back a piece like Lundell?
 
DackellDuck said:
Sure, but at this point in the season, how many teams would Rantanen be willing to extend with? He could very well say it's either Florida or UFA...
Click to expand...
Then we would either keep him or trade him to the highest rental bid. If he’s willing to extend with Florida then it’s a big package coming back. Rantanen doesn’t have trade protection so the team has options.

Florida can’t afford him in the offseason without making significant cap moves. They likely can’t pull this off by just waiting it out and signing him. Canes control who gets to talk to him right now and theoretically until July 1
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
GIN ANTONIC said:
Then we would either keep him or trade him to the highest rental bid. If he’s willing to extend with Florida then it’s a big package coming back. Rantanen doesn’t have trade protection so the team has options.

Florida can’t afford him in the offseason without making significant cap moves. They likely can’t pull this off by just waiting it out and signing him. Canes control who gets to talk to him right now and theoretically until July 1
Click to expand...

Would a team pay more than Lundell and Samoskevich to get him as a rental? Personally I don't think so.

You could probably get more of a futures-oriented package (a couple 1st round picks, a top-end prospect), but what good does that for the Hurricanes who want to win now?
 
Given what is said about why he won't sign with the canes i cant see him extending with anyone before 3pm eastern Friday.

Maybe with more time he likes whatever team he's on whether it be Canes, or a team he's traded to.
 
DackellDuck said:
Would a team pay more than Lundell and Samoskevich to get him as a rental? Personally I don't think so.

You could probably get more of a futures-oriented package (a couple 1st round picks, a top-end prospect), but what good does that for the Hurricanes who want to win now?
Click to expand...
Lundell the young centre? IMO there’s zero chance Florida would trade that guy for Rantanen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaWa and Gizmo Tkachuk
dont see us trading lundell cause that opens a gap in center for us and Lundell is bascially a 2C

Only trade i see is CV but hed have to waive his NMC and we dont have a lot of cap space to resign some core pieces with a rantanen deal assuming its 10m+

Since we have no first rounders till 2050 giving up one of our last good prospects would be a huge gamble
 
  • Like
Reactions: MaWa
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom