It's because he cut everything he saw as not contributing to wins.
Forslund was incredible and I miss him. But at the time, every single decision was about getting all the money on the ice, and building goodwill by winning instead of paying an expensive ambassador.
One thing about Dundon is that you can believe what he says. He's about winning, not about feelings. Period.
Kaiton was fine for the radio, but his style was to tell you every single thing that was happening on the ice, so it was a bit like listening to an auctioneer. He spoke rapidly, fast and when he got excited, even faster. That's the wrong style for TV PBP, where your job isn't to tell everyone every single thing that's happening on the ice, since we can all see it as well.
I feel like there was some of that in there but I don’t believe it was the actual reason. I was pretty sure it came down to dollars, I could be wrong though.Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the whole issue with Forslund was that he wanted to continue to do national games even at the cost of local Canes games?
Which I completely understand if I were in his position, but also understand why Dundon wouldn’t prefer that.
.....and I'm thinking there's a reason the Tom Dundon is a billionaire and those that subscribe to this statement, for the most part, are not....IMO you can do both.
.....and I'm thinking there's a reason the Tom Dundon is a billionaire and those that subscribe to this statement, for the most part, are not....
And I'm betting John was proven right that he was worth more on the open market.Tom D didnt cut John, he offered Forslund the same deal as everyone else. John felt he was worth more and left. for a TV announcer that seems fair.
John is what kept me watching during the ded years. I would hate to go through those times again with MM. Doubt I would watch as much.
You don’t need to cut costs as much when you actually produce revenue.Reports of Dundon cutting costs have really slowed in recent years. Perhaps that was all just a new owner wanting to put their stamp on a business just because. Melnyk 2.0 he turned out not to be.
Tampa said they weren’t interested because he wanted to do national televised games.Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the whole issue with Forslund was that he wanted to continue to do national games even at the cost of local Canes games?
Which I completely understand if I were in his position, but also understand why Dundon wouldn’t prefer that.
He had done the national televised games thing for us for a few years, missing a couple games a season to do it. We had been okay enough with that before, it wasn't a dealbreaker for us, though I don't think we ever liked it much. Not taking the same covid contract structure everyone else did was the dealbreaker.Tampa said they weren’t interested because he wanted to do national televised games.
But we offered the employees the same deal where money was guaranteed but a lot of pay was dependent upon butts in seats.
Everyone else took it. John didn’t. Seattle came calling.
Thats what I remember also. I dont think he was willing to take a pay cut for the games he wasnt on either.Correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t the whole issue with Forslund was that he wanted to continue to do national games even at the cost of local Canes games?
Which I completely understand if I were in his position, but also understand why Dundon wouldn’t prefer that.
You must not listen to many other local crews if you think Mike is mid lower tier. Hes is worlds better then most.When it comes to PBP guys much like others without John I wouldn’t have watched nearly as many games as I did during the dark ages.
Mike seems like a great guy and all, but he’s lower-mid tier at best when it comes to calling games. Is it too much to ask that the PBP guy at least knows the players on his own team.
It irks me that he constantly calls plays for players who aren’t even on the ice, like multiple times a game. Twice last broadcast he called “Slavin clears the zone” and Slavin wasn’t even on the ice, hell it wasn’t even a defenseman who cleared the puck. And don’t even get me started with “BURNS SHOT RIGHT ON” that either crushed some poor guys shin guard or went 5 feet wide.
Please win game tonight.
Variable pay aspect of “Butts in seats” would have paid off big time the last two years.Tampa said they weren’t interested because he wanted to do national televised games.
But we offered the employees the same deal where money was guaranteed but a lot of pay was dependent upon butts in seats.
Everyone else took it. John didn’t. Seattle came calling.
i believe that pay scale was only for the covid year but I could be wrong. we were at regular capacity by game 20 that season. I cant remember the exact game number.Variable pay aspect of “Butts in seats” would have paid off big time the last two years.
If they kept those contracts in place past 2020-21.Variable pay aspect of “Butts in seats” would have paid off big time the last two years.
It's not your money.IMO you can do both.