nowhereman
Registered User
How's 2021, Doc Brown? Still as shitty as ever?If they want to make it realistic they should make the cover Quinn Hughes losing coverage in the D zone
How's 2021, Doc Brown? Still as shitty as ever?If they want to make it realistic they should make the cover Quinn Hughes losing coverage in the D zone
Relative shit, Bert EIt really nothing, it’s not like some prestigious honour to be on a NHL video game cover
I don't. But I also understand how a pair of Swedish twins who were commonly referred to as the sisters outside of Vancouver would not be an ideal selling feature in the USA.You cannot possibly think that is at all the same thing. Not even close. Cmon.
I don't. But I also understand how a pair of Swedish twins who were commonly referred to as the sisters outside of Vancouver would not be an ideal selling feature in the USA.
I don't think you quite appreciate how xenophobic Americans can be. But carry on with your lamentation of how wronged the Sedins were.The people you are talking about also would not care for a couple of guys who are string beans and the fact that one plays for a Canadian team.
I'm trying to not get infracted. The last part lolI don't think you quite appreciate how xenophobic Americans can be. But carry on with your lamentation of how wronged the Sedins were.
Your reference from the 1800s goes over my head old timerHow's 2021, Doc Brown? Still as shitty as ever?
There's multiple cases where last years game was a lot better in content and playability, but they just had to push that next version which sucked ass in compare.Oh no....you are buying the roster updates. The game is free
They’re just copying Pete and Peteyep, "Luke and Luke" just riding on the coattails of the mighty quinn.
His reference goes back to the 1980s and it refers to a movie that's still available and one you've likely seen. You could very well be calling someone an "old timer" who's younger than you.Your reference from the 1800s goes over my head old timer
If you were going to monologue like this you might as well name the movie rather than just grandstand for no apparent reason. and btw the old timer reference was not supposed to be degrading at all.His reference goes back to the 1980s and it refers to a movie that's still available and one you've likely seen, so you might want to be careful about calling someone an "old timer" when it's entirely possible they could be younger than you.
But to cut to the chase, and even if you didn't understand his reference, which is by no means a big deal, his reference is still mind-numbingly easy to figure out. You don't need to be a historian or a Michael J. Fox fan to figure it out.
It's two short paragraphs, and I named the lead actor. I also edited it which you didn't catch because I didn't want it to sound like I was trying to beat you up.If you were going to monologue like this you might as well name the movie rather than just grandstand for no apparent reason.
You could be right. I think they all sucked except for the first one though, right?i thought it was a reference to back to the future III which was the old western one with the steam train time machine