At least i can admit that i was wrong. I said McLellan was a bad choice, and now i can say i couldn't have been more wrong.
How do you improve the Wings?
- Thread starter OgeeOgelthorpe
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.
Trading Tank for Nyquist & Bergy + for Tatar & Kovacevic = Stanley Cup
Kasper - Larkin - Raymond
Cat - Copp - Kane
Tatar - Compher - Nyquist
Rasmussen - Veleno - Motte
Johansson - Seider
Edvinsson - Kovacevic
Chiarot - Holl
Kasper - Larkin - Raymond
Cat - Copp - Kane
Tatar - Compher - Nyquist
Rasmussen - Veleno - Motte
Johansson - Seider
Edvinsson - Kovacevic
Chiarot - Holl
Last edited:
I know he has played good recently but are we really sure Johansson shouldn’t be used as a potential asset in a trade? I really think we gotta go and get another top 4 guy.
It still very very interesting, how these players who Yzerman got summer, were so off with Lalonde, but are now doing well under McLellan.
I’ll have to plead ignorance regarding Johansson since I haven’t watched many Red Wings games as of late (due to the NHL Network and working weekends), but from what I have seen he seems to look pretty comfortable playing on the right side of Ed…Being that he’s also a player that the Wings drafted gives a sense of satisfaction with the direction this team is headed.
He has value for us , not for others yet. Trading him now , you don't get good value in return.
Maybe become our version of former Blackhawk Dman Hjalmarsson where he’s not flashy but a solid 2 way guy who gets the job done.
just wanna go on the record and say i hope they dont trade anyone while they playing well. if they skid for 3-4 games fine, but not now
Agreed.
This team appears to be playing up to their potential and any roster change could see some undesirable effects.
I would rather spend a bit more draft capital than trade away guys we've spent years developing to get to this point.
Depends on the player coming back our way.
I'm not too interested in making minor moves. Red Wings have a lot of prospects knocking on the door, basically all of them aren't 1st line potential, so that sets up what you really target imo in UFA or trades.
Need to make trades/future signings for a top two C, and a top 4 LHD.(imo)
I'm not too interested in making minor moves. Red Wings have a lot of prospects knocking on the door, basically all of them aren't 1st line potential, so that sets up what you really target imo in UFA or trades.
Need to make trades/future signings for a top two C, and a top 4 LHD.(imo)
I'd move him in the right deal. Bet it would be after the season, though, where someone has a guy looking at a raise they can't afford and wouldn't mind a cost controlled (if slightly downgraded) replacement.
Everyone playing better now puts us in a much better position to go after trades, though. They keep playing well and everyone will have better trade value.
No, but I'll sure rename it.Can we close this thread now? They seem fixed.
Bringing Tatar back?! My wife would be happier than if we were to win the Cup
Users who are viewing this thread
Ad
Latest posts
Ad
Upcoming events
-
-
-
-
NFC Wild Card Minnesota Vikings vs Los Angeles Rams - Glendale, ArizonaWagers: 9Staked: $9,186.00Event closes- Updated:
-