Little bit of Column A, little bit of Column B.
In a male dominated profession, women will be scrutinized more. Bad male broadcasters are roasted but bad female ones are crucified. Rightly so in many cases but there is more heat thrown on them because they are bad and they must only be on the broadcast because they are a woman if they are indeed that bad. Leah Hextall, Cammi Granato way back in the day and whoever ESPN had on the Oilers/Kings playoff series just now come to mind.
There is also a meathead component to the Carrlyn thing. She isn't as hot as she was when she was scooping up ice in stretch pants and a sports bra but that is like 17 years ago so, sure, she got a hair cut. Outside of myself and a blessed few, most people don't look as good as they did 17 years ago. For longtime fans, there is definitely going to be a bit of "I liked you when you were captain of the Ice Girls v. telling me about hockey while having a short hair cut".
Agree that putting stuff out there opens you up to criticism, but she gets critiqued on her looks as well as what is deserved so it gets a bit uglier than it needs to be,
I mean, I think I'm the only one that ever criticizes Hoven's looks, except for maybe
@Maynard. Now there is a mug only a mother could love, but is he getting grief for that?
It's just so easy to not pay attention to the broadcast outside of the actual game. Part of the reason why I love this place: full of Kings and hockey historians that don't need Hoven or anyone to tell them what is going on. There is nothing new under the sun and most of us on here have seen it all before.