ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 78,066
- 45,214
Seems one of these two will be exposed in the expansion draft.
Which one do you see the Leafs exposing?
Which one do you see the Leafs exposing?
It'll be a question until we know the answer.Why is this still a question? One guy averaged over 21 minutes, paying against the other teams top lines and the other was heavily sheltered, averaging just over 13 minutes. These guys are not the same.
Interesting look.I see them exposing Dermott, but I'd expose Holl.
- Holl's numbers since Feb 1 were garbage, and IMO clearly being carried by Muzzin as a top-4.
- Dermott's underlying numbers are very strong and is our best rush defender
- Younger
- Now that it's signed, cheaper
Just seems like poor asset management to expose the 25-year old versus the 30-year old.
Interesting look.
Not a lot of faith in Dubas I take it?
expose both, and if neither get picked, trade bothSeems one of these two will be exposed in the expansion draft.
Which one do you see the Leafs exposing?
Expose Dermott, keep Holl.
Holl has played as a top4 defenseman and done well since he broke into the league. Dermott has done very well on our third pair and looked okay enough in the few stretches of top4 minutes that he's played for us. But he was our #6 this year, taking a step back and ultimately losing his job to Sandin. Justin Holl is a #4D making 2m with term, Dermott is a #6D making 1.5m with the same term. The Leafs are looking to compete, keep the better player, it's pretty simple.
Dermott has had two years to steal Holl's job, but the gap has only grown between the two. I still think Dermott can be a top4 defenseman in the league for a long time, but we're comparing him to a guy who IS a top4 defenseman right now. The only way I see this discussion being relevant would be if Holl cost quite a bit more.
It'd be pretty silly to expose the guy your coach plays 21 minutes per game over the guy he plays 13. I wish we'd have given Dermott a shot to move up the lineup sometime in the last four years. Seattle might give him a proper shot at a top-four role though.
What if the coach isn't that good at coaching?
Then the GM should fire him. Dubas and Keefe were basically sold to us as a duo, I assume they're mostly on the same page. I think there's a good chance that Dermott ends up better than Holl, but it won't be here playing the same bottom-pair LD spot year after year.
Dermott all day.
- 5 years younger, 500k cheaper
- Significantly better than Holl was at the same age
- Can play both sides
- Excellent transitional defense
- Sneaky physical
- Best skater on the blueline
- Primed for a top-4 role, just needs to be given the opportunity (could easily replicate Holl's impact if carried by Muzzin too)
Anyone who "doesn't see it with Dermott", which you hear constantly on here, doesn't know how to evaluate young defenseman. He's been given zero opportunity offensively in this org. despite being a PP QB at every other level, including a championship AHL team. His defensive growth has been steady and his skating has become better than any other D on the team. He's carried the 3rd pair for years now until Bogosian was brought in and the only knock is his giveaways under pressure (see: every young D). He has the tools to be a McDonagh-lite as a great complementary piece for any pair.
Developing young D is a turbulent process. Just look at how people are already turning on Sandin after anointing him the next Kaberle 3 months ago. New shiny toy syndrome.