Bear of Bad News
"The Worst Guy on the Site" - user feedback
- Sep 27, 2005
- 13,896
- 28,672
I thought this was really funny.
Thanks! I'll be here all week.
I thought this was really funny.
Everyone has bias, but not to the point of including an all-Canadian top 10? How does that even make sense?
Says the person who wants 5 contemporaneous Russians in the top 5-10 hockey players of all time.
What is wrong with that? They were the best of the best. Kharlamov was the Maradonna of hockey.
Maltsev over Gretzky?
Good luck convincing anyone of that.
Did I say he was the best player? I was just listing some. I think Kharlamov definitely deserves the no. 2 spot.
So over Howe, Orr and Gretzky then, eh?
Nobody can deny that Gretzky is the greatest, but yes Kharlamov should be placed over the others you mentioned.
None of Kharlamov's teammates would rank him over Bobby Orr
I think you need a citation for that one.
Nobody can deny that Gretzky is the greatest, but yes Kharlamov should be placed over the others you mentioned.
Based on what?
Kharlamov didn't even dominate the Soviet league like any of those players dominated the NHL.
While Kharlamov has no place in any top 5 player, never mind top 5 Wingers list he is the type of player that can get over rated and glorified really quickly with his ankle injury, care of Bobby Clarke and flair on the ice along with his car accident and then untimely death.
These sorts of incidents go a long way in immortalizing a guy (and making him over rated).
I agree, but I wanna see his justification.
I think you need a citation for that one.
Have you ever seen the Summit Series? He made men look like boys. I want to see your justification for leaving him out of the top 5.
It is obviously delusional to argue with anyone who does not even have a Soviet Union/Russia player on their top 10.
Hockey is played outside of NA, just to let people know. Yes, even in the 70s,80s etc...
It is obviously delusional to argue with anyone who does not even have a Soviet Union/Russia player on their top 10.
Hockey is played outside of NA, just to let people know. Yes, even in the 70s,80s etc...
You have to make your case though. You can't just come in here screaming bias and hope to get any where (or actually be taken seriously, as you might have noticed heh.)
And just because a country has been producing top level hockey players for a given time, that doesn't guarantee any of them a spot in the top 5, 10 or even 25.
The Yanks have been producing them almost as long as the Russians have and you don't see anyone screaming bias because Chelios is barely cracking the top 30 as the top Yank.
Sometimes there's a definite case for bias but mostly it's brought up irrationally and without much thought or research beforehand.
Best example was catching a whole host of posters claiming bias NA bias for Lidstrom not winning the Calder without actually checking for who did win it. That one still makes me laugh to this day.
Well of course there is a gargantuan bias, this is a Canadian forum. But after seeing the list it seems the people who voted are stuck in their little universe without much thought for the outside world and how it compares.
Well of course there is a gargantuan bias, this is a Canadian forum.
But after seeing the list it seems the people who voted are stuck in their little universe without much thought for the outside world and how it compares.
Well of course there is a gargantuan bias, this is a Canadian forum. But after seeing the list it seems the people who voted are stuck in their little universe without much thought for the outside world and how it compares.