HOH Top 60 Goaltenders of All Time (2024 Edition) - Round 2, Vote 5

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
I think we can - with extreme confidence - have Hainsworth as an NR on every ballot this round. I don't like saying things like that, but it's so clear that this guy wasn't thought of very well, the little bit of film we have confirms that (and then some, in my opinion). I think that's an easy name to cross out.

Who's next?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nabby12

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,470
9,370
Regina, Saskatchewan
I think we can - with extreme confidence - have Hainsworth as an NR on every ballot this round. I don't like saying things like that, but it's so clear that this guy wasn't thought of very well, the little bit of film we have confirms that (and then some, in my opinion). I think that's an easy name to cross out.

Who's next?
I wouldn't be surprised if I rank him 10th or NR.

I have Hainsworth, Worsley, and Fuhr fighting for 10th spot right now and all are making a case for NR.
 

blogofmike

Registered User
Dec 16, 2010
2,324
1,148
Here are career save percentages of Holeček, Tretiak and Dzurilla (all major international tournaments they took part in):

Jiří Holeček (CSSR):
- 13 major international tournaments between 1966-1978
- 76 games / 150 goals allowed / 1761 saves / 0.9215

Vladislav Tretiak
(USSR):
- 19 major international tournaments between 1970-1984
- 126 games / 228 goals allowed / 2801 saves / 0.9247

Vladimír Dzurilla
(CSSR):
- 12 major international tournaments between 1963-1977
- 67 games / 131 goals allowed / 1237 saves / 0.9042

Holeček has considerably higher career international SV% than Dzurilla, and lower than Tretiak's. What about the 1971-1978 time frame, i.e. period most beneficial for Holeček compared to Tretiak & Dzurilla?

Jiří Holeček (CSSR):
- 11 major international tournaments between 1971-1978
- 70 games / 139 goals allowed / 1654 saves / 0.9225

Vladislav Tretiak
(USSR):
- 11 major international tournaments between 1971-1978
- 75 games / 156 goals allowed / 1821 saves / 0.9211

Vladimír Dzurilla
(CSSR):
- 5 major international tournaments between 1971-1978
- 23 games / 41 goals allowed / 437 saves / 0.9142

Holeček looks better as expected. He's leading SV% over this 8-season span.
______________________________________________

I also wanted to take a look at simpler comparison - how many goals against the Soviet team and the Czechoslovak team allowed during Holeček's prime. (CC 1976 excluded due to different number of games played by Czechoslovakia and Soviet Union)

1971 WHC:
USSR 24
CSSR 20


1972 Olympics:
USSR 13
CSSR 13


1972 WHC:
USSR 17
CSSR 16


1973 WHC:
USSR 18
CSSR 20


1974 WHC:
USSR 18
CSSR 20


1975 WHC:
USSR 23
CSSR 19


1976 Olympics:
USSR 11
CSSR 10


1976 WHC:
USSR 15
CSSR 7


1977 WHC:
USSR 16
CSSR 20


1978 WHC:
USSR 23
CSSR 15


Overall GAs:
USSR 177
CSSR 160


During this time frame, Czechoslovaks won gold medals 3x, silver medals 5x, bronze medals 2x. Soviets won gold medals 7x, silver medals 2x, bronze medals 1x. Czechoslovakia was competitive with the Soviet Union, but remained well below them.

Superior USSR team success didn't transmit to defense. The main difference between the Soviet team and the Czechoslovak team lay in the offensive output, not in the defensive results. Any time before or after 1971-1978 will show Soviets being the best in whatever offense or defense team metric you can think of. Holeček deserves credit for this.

Leaving out CC76 is leaving out their only best-on-best appearance, no?

1976 Canada Cup (SILVER)
Dzurilla 5 GP, .920, 2.36
Holecek 5 GP, .861, 3.25

As for the others:

1966 WC (SILVER)
Dzurilla 6 GP, .901, 1.97
Holecek 2 GP, .861, 2.58

1972 Olympics (BRONZE)
Dzurilla 5 GP, .926, 1.89
Holecek 3 GP, .849, 3.48

1972 WC (GOLD)
Dzurilla 4 GP, .925, 1.50
Holecek 3 GP, .923, 1.67

1976 WC (GOLD)
Dzurilla, 2 GP, .976, 0.50
Holecek 8 GP, .943, 1.63

1977 WC (GOLD)
Dzurilla, 7 GP, .888, 2.70
Hplecek, 4 GP, .870, 4.20

Holecek seems to get a lot of mileage out of being the hero of 1976 (when Martinec was the leading scorer and Pospisil voted top defender), but over the Gold medal WC wins, they split the games fairly evenly, with Dzurilla playing more in 1972 and 1977.

Dzurilla runs into Simpson's paradox. Dzurilla beats Holecek in every tournament, but he plays less in 1976 and more in 1977, so while he's 6-0 in head to head competition with Holecek for save percentage titles, he's 0-1 in the aggregate.
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,470
9,370
Regina, Saskatchewan
Tony Esposito in the Cup Finals

1971 Finals
Chicago wins 2-1 in OT
Shots: Blackhawks 58 Habs 37
Blackhawks 1 Canadiens 0

The Calgary Herald · ‎May 5, 1971
The limited scoring in just over four periods of end-to-end hockey was due mainly to the excellent goaltending of Chicago's Tony Esposito and young Ken Dryden.

Bobby Hull gave credit to Dryden, a 24-year-old rookie. "He's a real good goalie," Hull said. "I'll tell you one thing, he doesn't make many mistakes."
The Montreal Gazette · ‎May 5, 1971
Tony Esposito had his moments of glory in the second period.

[Canadiens] put on the pressure without results against Esposito


Chicago wins 5-3
Shots: Blackhawks 35 Habs 27
Blackhawks 2 Canadiens 0

Herald-Journal · ‎May 7, 1971
Only some standout goaltending by Chicago's Tony Esposito held Montreal at bay
The Montreal Gazette · ‎May 7, 1971
Esposito, who made 24 saves in a much easier game than that for Dryden


Montreal wins 4-2
Shots: Blackhawks 18 Habs 40
Blackhawks 2 Canadiens 1

The Montreal Gazette · ‎May 10, 1971
Tony Esposito pulls off miraculous save around heavy traffic which includes Jean Beliveau, Frank Mahovlich, Pat Stapleton, and Bill White.

Take it from Serge Savard, neither Billy Reay with his good coaching moves nor Tony Esposito with his brilliant goal-tending, can stop the Canadiens all the way. "They just can't stop a team like this all the time," said the broken-legged Montreal defenceman... "All the goals we scored today were going for the top, that Esposito just can't be beaten down low."


Montreal wins 5-2
Shots: Blackhawks 32 Habs 32
Blackhawks 2 Canadiens 2

The Leader-Post · ‎May 12, 1971
Both Ken Dryden and Tony Esposito, in goal for Montreal and Chicago respectively, turned in fine performances.


Chicago wins 2-0
Shots: Blackhawks 22 Habs 31
Blackhawks 3 Canadiens 2

The Montreal Gazette · ‎May 14, 1971
Against Chicago's standup defence and the clutch goal-tending of Tony Esposito.

Esposito blocked 31 shots for this second shutout of the 1971 playoffs. But Tony seldom had to pounce on a rebound while getting great protection.

Montreal wins 4-3
Shots: Blackhawks 30 Habs 16
Blackhawks 3 Canadiens 3

No relevant comments, but 4 goals on 16 shots isn't great.


Montreal wins 3-2
Shots: Blackhawks 33 Habs 25
Blackhawks 3 Canadiens 4

The Windsor Star · ‎May 19, 1971
Said Bobby Hull: "I don't blame Tony Esposito. Those goals like Jacques Lemaire's happen. I've got some myself. Ever after that, we were still leading and had the momentum. Their second goal took some sand out of us, though, although I don't know what happened."

The Evening News · ‎May 19, 1971
Jacques Lemaire then unloaded a 65-foot shot past goalie Tony Esposito to cut the lead in half.

Goalie Esposito said: "I have no excuses, not at all. I saw Lemaire's shot all the way and just missed it."


Overall, a strong series, but he is thoroughly outplayed by Dryden. The media is gushing all over Dryden in nearly every game. The Hawks had a strong offense and get lots of good opportunities, but Dryden is a wall. Esposito does good all things considered, but I'll note that he let in a bad goal in game 7 that likely cost them the game. Bobby Hull is the best player on the Hawks. The Mahovlich brothers get lots of praise in Montreal. I had to double check Mikita played as he's absent any positive mentions.



1973 Finals
Montreal wins 8-3
Shots: Blackhawks 30 Habs 38
Blackhawks 0 Canadiens 1

The Montreal Gazette · ‎Apr 30, 1973
Tony Esposito, a guy who had allowed two goals on his last 116 shots, allowed two on the first four in this one.

Esposito didn't even finish the game. [Coach] Reay opting for Gary Smith after Chuck Lefley scored the game's final goal at 14:35 of the third period. "There was no criticism in that move," said Reay, "it was just that Tony has been under a lot of pressure in the last few days and I thought he could use a little rest."


Montreal wins 4-1
Shots: Blackhawks 19 Habs 29
Blackhawks 0 Canadiens 2

No relevant comments


Chicago wins 7-4. Mikita returns after missing game 2 and leaving game 1 with a broken finger.
Shots: Blackhawks 35 Habs 33
Blackhawks 1 Canadiens 2

The Windsor Star · ‎May 4, 1973
After the Hawks ran the count to 5-0 early in the second period, they backed off and paid for it. It took Canadiens most a scratchy second to get their foot in the door and then they flew at Tony Esposito in the Chicago nets in waves.


Montreal wins 4-0
Shots: Blackhawks 19 Habs 30
Blackhawks 1 Canadiens 3

The Montreal Gazette · ‎May 7, 1973
Guy Lapointe, who all but has his initials carved on the Conn Smythe Trophy...set up Claude Larose in front, forcing Tony Esposito to rise to the occasion once more to prevent a Candiens' landslide.

"I was worried," Bowman said. "You can outplay a team, but if you don't get the goals you're asking for heartbreak. IF Tony Esposito stops Cournoyer too, they might look around and say 'Hey, he's not going to give 'em anything more, - let's get a couple ourselves.' Thank God we got one on that shift."


Chicago wins 8-7
Shots: Blackhawks 29 Habs 31
Blackhawks 2 Canadiens 3

The Journal · ‎May 9, 1973
The real victims were the goalies - Ken Dryden of the Canadiens and Tony Esposito of the Hawks.

Esposito was so stunned by it all that he could hardly speak above a whisper. "Wide-open," said Esposito. " What else can you say? I think out of the 15 goals, three or four shouldn't have gone in.... Tonight the team carried me. I let in seven goals and they got me the victory."

Montreal wins 6-4
Shots: Blackhawks 27 Habs 33
Blackhawks 2 Canadiens 4

The Journal · ‎May 11, 1973
Scotty Bowman said "I think the Hawks are vastly underrated. Remember, they have guys like Tony Esposito, Bill White, Pat Stapleton and Stan Mikita. These guys are all-stars. When you beat them, you're beating a team that has the stuff."


The last four games, last two in particular, were sloppy. Esposito let in 17 goals in three games. The Hawks lacked depth, but the Canadiens had all of it. I don't want to blame Esposito too much here as he's not given any support. Mikita misses time and is clearly not healthy when he's playing.


Overall, he does much better in 1971 than in 1973 but he is also on a much better team. Not much in the way of praise of the Hawks' defensive work. The Hawks are thoroughly outmatched in both series. The Montreal depth is way too much to overcome. In 1973 in particular, the Hawks just don't have a team that can reasonably win the Cup.
 
Last edited:

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,377
7,717
Regina, SK
I will be ranking Hainsworth. Probably not highly, but I definitely see at least a few guys I like him better than. Only 15 years ago he was consistently rated a top 10 goalie by people like us. And I was probably at the forefront of the backlash against him and the dangers of looking at his three straight vezinas as justification for him being the next guy after Dryden or durnan or whoever. But in that regard, I think the pendulum has swung far enough that now I may actually be one of his defenders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MXD and nabby12

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
Only 15 years ago he was consistently rated a top 10 goalie by people like us.
And Nail Yakupov was ranked as the next.........................

There's just no case for Hainsworth at all...unless you want to ignore most contemporary opinion and take the stats of pre-forward pass goaltending...in which case, put Connell at #1 and slide everyone down.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nabby12

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
I referenced in the prelim discussion my utter distrust of Tony Esposito...


Patrick Roy - The aforementioned butterfly, but combined with skating and a competitive fire that took it to another level from Glenn Hall. Innovator, or at least, mastered the innovation and brought it to the forefront (Warhol wasn't the first kitschy pop art guy...he was just the first to really know how to market it and live the lifestyle...Roy may be Warhol).

Jacq.........................wait a minute. Glenn Hall ---> Patrick Roy. Someone very prominent is missing in the butterfly timeline.

Tony Esposito

Why is he missing?

Because he wasn't that good at it. He didn't advent or advance the butterfly...he stole it as part of a patchwork of guessing and poor technique. Maybe I'll lose the art references here in case someone knows who Elaine Sturtevant is...you ever tell a joke from a comedian whose timing and rhythm you can't match? That's Tony Esposito for me. He just took what the last Blackhawks goalie did and tried to mimic it.

He's not the best skater. He's so unbelievably impatient and unpoised. He makes the first move every single time and cannot account for it with his skill. Rebounds are a mess. Second save process is a mess. I don't know if we have the data, but I bet if you did an ELO ranking of shooters, I'd wager that Tony O gets beat by the upper tier more often than any other. The bad players might not have had the skill to figure out how to deal with him kneeling and sliding out at them, but the skilled players had no trouble at all.

Enter: His playoff record. Where you're normally playing better players on the whole. I mean, who loses 18 out of 19 playoff games? He won 12 of his last 46.

Let's just get to the film here...

We want to be fair to the era, and it's pretty tough to find guys here, so I'm glad the "represent all eras!" rhetoric has died down now that the scores are higher. At the end of the day, I guess - personally - I'd rather take guys that I don't know how good they are from 1910 than guys that I know are bad from 1980 haha

Anyway, to be fair to Esposito, let's use Bernie Parent as the guide. I didn't expect to like Parent - I went against him in the last project - but that was superficial. It was the ol' "he only has X seasons" and "he was behind a great defensive team" and "Bobby Clarke was..." and all the ancillary stuff. But when you go back and watch, it's a high end goalie. Inconsistent early in his career, teams didn't necessarily "make a mistake" at the time because - like Sergei Bobrovsky - there was some stuff that needed fixing and then once he got the help he needed, he took off and became elite.

Reminder of Parent's game here:


We'll also have some help - I suspect (I haven't watched a single second of this game before, so I have no idea what's gonna happen) that we'll get some help from either Billy Smith or Chico Resch in this game as well...both are clearly superior goalies to Esposito for my tastes. I can only hope Resch made some lists besides mine.



First shot attempt the game (when you aren't good, it doesn't take long to present itself haha).

Freeze it at around 0:53 when NYI2 takes the shot (without taking 30 feet of ice in front of him, as was the style at the time). It's a left shot from the left boards. So, exterior stick. Let's pretend that you can't read pucks off the stick (he can't...ever) because it's a slapshot. Where is this puck likely to go?

Now, I get a bad rap because people feel I'm too particular about what I want out of a goalie. And one of those things that people feel I'm picky about is: I want the goalie in the ******* net when a shot is coming...

Screenshot-2024-11-08-141234.png

This is an example of a goalie, not really being in the net...per se.

A lot of technical signals we can get here. If you watched the few seconds here with this puck winding back to the point, we see the skating is a bit clunky. That's ok, you don't have to be a figure skater - especially at this point in the position's evolution - to make it. I appreciate the willingness to get depth on the shot. You skate it at it like a flat-footed defenseman, so I have concerns there. But whatever, I don't need perfection, I just need something I can hang my hat on.

One of the reasons that crease depth is so important to me is because that's the old phrase "cut down the angle" and "give them less net to shoot at"...and while an attempt was made, ummm...I don't know how to say it. He skated out and gave NYI2 more net to shoot at. He's taking away far post, but all the action of this shooting mechanism is short side-middle. Which is exactly what anyone who has ever seen a hockey game before would expect here. It's gonna be tough for a LHS from the left boards to pull this thing all the way to the far right top corner and score.

Also, the idea of almost every point shot where you don't take ice is for someone else to score. Just in the screenshot alone, look at the Islanders in the circle. Who is the threat? Well, both of them, in their own way. But the immediate threat is the Islander facing us. That's a loose stick and a deflection chance...a damn good one too.

So...do you suspect that this puck can get tipped to the far side from this? Nah. Certainly not in such a way that butterflying into the save wouldn't protect.

If the shot is on net, and a rebound occurs, and NYI22 - who has a famously quick shot release - gets it...where it's going? Yes, also short side.

So, the shot is going in the middle of the net or short side. The biggest threat is the tip, same place. The next threat is the rebound off the initial shot, also likely going short side.

Where is Tony O (that could be the theme of this post actually, it's a good title)?

He is on the far side of the net. He's not square. And his blocker has almost 100% overlap with his left pad. This ensures that he takes up even less of the net than he's even attempting to...not take up...or something.

The shot goes...as you know...short side. And out of play.

There's a whole host of hilarious stick stuff that Esposito does because his complete lack of patience. He's quite literally a defenseman playing goalie at times. I almost wonder if this is the last of the "he was too awful at being a skater, so we stuffed him in net" stories - even though they should have died out after the War haha



Weak shot from outside the dots, should be no trouble...but it hits a speed bump along the way, so it's a little knuckler. That sucks, but it should be no trouble for someone that has done this before. It should be no trouble for anyone that played floor hockey in the hotel hallway on a road trip haha

Oopsy doopsy. But why?

Screenshot-2024-11-08-143745.png

Absorb a puck. Not stick blade ramped up, ya goose. Why would you do that. Stick blade flat, allow some give, backed by the pad. Easy save. Absorb. And given the time, this is either a controlled rebound to a player. Or because it's a bouncy house, it's a stop, control, paddle to a player situation. He ramps it over his own head while he's almost in the circle.

No one stores a rake on the ground lying face up...except this dude.

All right, these get long in a hurry...I don't want to show a bunch of goals against and go, "see, he stinks" because that's the reason why we don't have any goalies from this era in the first place. And the ones we do have aren't the right ones. But let's just look at this real quick and then we can come back for more if there's interest...

It's the playoffs in this clip, so you know you'd rather have a folding chair in net, but...



First of all, at 0:50 of this clip, you see how good Chico Resch is. Not the greatest athlete or skater, but very good reads and positioning. He stops a breakaway or penalty shot here in the iso cam footage. He gets depth, he matches speed back, he doesn't fall on his ass as soon as a feint is made, and then telescopes out the pad on the forehand shot. And ya know, doesn't have his glove down his pants and he remained in the net the whole time...stuff you take for granted.

After that it's two slapshot goals that go through Tony O from midrange. This is going to be tough to describe via text...but he doesn't know what's gonna happen on these plays. If you slow it down and read his body mechanics, nothing is really going in the same direction.

The knees push up, so hips go up. But skates go out, so body goes down. Glove goes this way. Blocker goes that way. Head pulls back. It's like a flinch. It's like when you shoot on a goalie in street hockey or men's league that hasn't played before...it's those mechanics. There's no method to it. Like, some guys - like Holtby - they go "head, hands, feet" in that order, every time. That's the order of movement.

What he's offering is basically: skate out as far as I can and yell really loud with my body...hopefully that scares the puck away.

I know he played a ton so the GSAA noise is through the roof - I think we all see how misleading that is in this environment. The splits are big for me here. Bad players shoot with their head down. Good players don't. Great players pass. So it's no surprise that anyone looking up scored on him. The players that were looking up played in the playoffs more often than the '75 Caps roster.

He's probably better than Hainsworth and he "accomplished" more I guess...but the gap is negligible, and if this list only goes to 60, we don't neither of them on the final list. That's not a battle I intend to win, but he sure as hell doesn't belong in this round.

Jacques Plante - the goalie whisperer of the era - agrees, in so many words:

“Esposito, because of his style, leaves a lot of rebounds,” said Plante. “Because of his style he makes the first move, rather than letting the shooter make his. He comes out and then moves backwards and because of that he’s off balance. Because of his crouch, he can’t cover the top of the net.

“There’s no way he can cover when somebody changes his mind or on a deflection. He’s a reflex goalie—how many times have you seen him make that long reach to make a save? If he has to do that, he’s standing in the wrong place.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,741
17,652
I think we can - with extreme confidence - have Hainsworth as an NR on every ballot this round. I don't like saying things like that, but it's so clear that this guy wasn't thought of very well, the little bit of film we have confirms that (and then some, in my opinion). I think that's an easy name to cross out.

Who's next?
I'm not convinced Hainsworth is worst than Thompson, whom I'm convinced is NOT the worst netminder this round (which is Fuhr). So... No.
 
Last edited:

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
I'm not convinced Hainsworth is worst than Thompson, whom I'm convinced is NOT the worst netminder this round. So... No.
I have them 50 spots apart. Tiny Thompson being behind Hainsworth certainly spits in the face of contemporary opinion and what little film we have...

@overpass has gone through the thread about all-time teams by old-time players, and counted the number of times various old-time goalies appear on lists.

After removing teammates/coaches and removing any second/third place or mentions:

Charlie Gardiner: 7
Tiny Thompson: 5
George Hainsworth: 2
Alec Connell: 2
Roy Worters: 0

But I think I'm fine with Thompson not being here now if it drags Hainsworth down with him. I don't mind that.

But Thompson gets some legit talk about being maybe the best ever when Brimsek takes over for him.

Hainsworth has the numbers, but comparatively, far, far less praise...and with those numbers, it would have been easier to give him the praise (or Connell) and neither of them really get it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: nabby12

blogofmike

Registered User
Dec 16, 2010
2,324
1,148
Overall, he does much better in 1971 than in 1973 but he is also on a much better team. Not much in the way of praise of the Hawks' defensive work. The Hawks are thoroughly outmatched in both series. The Montreal depth is way too much to overcome. In 1973 in particular, the Hawks just don't have a team that can reasonably win the Cup.

Esposito gave up 7 goals and the 73 Hawks responded by becoming the only visiting team to ever score 8 goals at the Montreal Forum.



First one is a weird bounce (clearer on replay) but the one around 5:00 looks like a guy who never played goalie before.
 

MXD

Partying Hard
Oct 27, 2005
51,741
17,652
But Thompson gets some legit talk about being maybe the best ever when Brimsek takes over for him.

That's mostly an incentive to completely disregard the comment in that case, considering the person making the comment probably saw Vezina and Gardiner (or completely disregarded those two because they were too old or whatever).
 
  • Like
Reactions: nabby12

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
That's mostly an incentive to completely disregard the comment in that case, considering the person making the comment probably saw Vezina and Gardiner (or completely disregarded those two because they were too old or whatever).
Maybe, maybe not. Given how close the praise is between Gardiner and Thompson and the general feeling that pre-forward pass goaltending is far, ahem, different than the next generation...it seems more defensible than not.

Not saying I necessarily agree or to what extent. But I don't think it's so outlandish that it can be discarded out of hand like this...it's not some singular claim by a lone kook...
 

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,377
7,717
Regina, SK
And Nail Yakupov was ranked as the next.........................

There's just no case for Hainsworth at all...unless you want to ignore most contemporary opinion and take the stats of pre-forward pass goaltending...in which case, put Connell at #1 and slide everyone down.
That's....... Not true. At all. I know that 4ths and 5ths aren't worth all that much, but hainsworth has a pretty long string of All-Star voting results, both official and unofficial, that has him in the top five in the league.

1-2-2-2-3-4-4-5-5 isn't nothing. It's a lot more than Connell has. And yes, I know that at the time the world had not yet heard the sweet voice of Frank Sinatra, but that hardly has anything to do with what we should think of the top few goaltenders of that time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nabby12

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,377
7,717
Regina, SK
I'll be the first one to agree that George hainsworth's award recognition was not in line with what one would expect from a top 10 goalie, as we used to consider him. In fact, I may have been the very first one to repeatedly make that point, leading to his eventual downfall. But he does have a level of recognition suitable for this particular round against this particular field.
 

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
That's....... Not true. At all. I know that 4ths and 5ths aren't worth all that much, but hainsworth has a pretty long string of All-Star voting results, both official and unofficial, that has him in the top five in the league.

1-2-2-2-3-4-4-5-5 isn't nothing. It's a lot more than Connell has. And yes, I know that at the time the world had not yet heard the sweet voice of Frank Sinatra, but that hardly has anything to do with what we should think of the top few goaltenders of that time.
I don't know the context of those numbers. Are those split league numbers? What share of the votes? What competition?

Re: the last sentence. Some folks keep throwing that out, but we all know that we're adjusting for league quality and position evolution to some degree already. Lemieux and Gretzky are in the top 4 players of all time. We have 0 NHL goalies from the WHA-absorption/early-mid 80's. We have like a two-decade gap in birth years - baby boom years no less - with no goalies through 21 places.

You guys "won" the pre-forward pass era in the face of contemporary opinion to the contrary. I think in 10 years, we'll look back on that and wonder what we were thinking. But I don't think we need to continue to wink at some sort of era bias anymore...

We should take much bigger offense at the "well, that's what we did last time..." which was what you led off with - in part.
 

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
But he does have a level of recognition suitable for this particular round against this particular field.
Hmmm, maybe...but I think that has more to do with previous lists being used as a crutch and this batch of names being available now. I can't even tell what to root for here...maybe I should try to pump all the pre-forward pass guys now just to get them out of the way. Because at least some of these names are going to be added, and it's a positively tragic list of players.

On a more positive and productive note...do you have any time for Lumley?
 

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,470
9,370
Regina, Saskatchewan
A big mark in Hainsworth's favour is adaptability. He grew up in 7 man no forward pass no dropping to knees hockey. Was 18 when rover was eliminated in Ontario. He was 35 when forward pass became rink wide. He played 9 seasons after that. His last NHL game came at age 43.

That he was still a capable starter at age 42 isn't nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nabby12

jigglysquishy

Registered User
Jun 20, 2011
8,470
9,370
Regina, Saskatchewan
I finished reading Diary of a Dynasty about the Leafs 1957-1967. Great read. A couple goalie related points.

Plante and Sawchuk come across as goalie royalty. Sawchuk was almost the Conn Smythe winner in 1967 despite being 37 and broken. His entire 60s run contains very strong playoff runs. Lots of references to the Wings being thoroughly outmatched except for Howe and Sawchuk. Bower comes across great too throughout and might be the best overall Leaf across their 6 Cup runs.

The authors don't shy away from their dislike of Gump Worsley. He is talked about as an "also-ran" that lost his job in the 1967 playoffs to baby Rogie Vachon. That he was the weak link on that Montreal dynasty and lacked the technical proficiency to be relied upon.

I was expecting more Glenn Hall love. The book has lots of love for non Leafs, most particularly Howe, Hull, and Orr. But Glenn Hall gets 1% the praise of Plante despite being a constant foe in playoff games.
 
Last edited:

Michael Farkas

Celebrate 68
Jun 28, 2006
14,921
10,368
NYC
www.youtube.com
The authors don't shy away from their dislike of Gump Worsley. He is talked about as an "also-ran" that lost his job in the 1967 playoffs to baby Rogie Vachon. That he was the weak link on that Montreal dynasty and lacked the technical proficiency to be relied upon.
I agree, this must be a great read!

The late Canadiens1958 also felt this way about Worsley.

If Fleury is getting into the HOF for "being a good guy", I think it's probably fair to apply that to Gump too. Wasn't he always sitting at the bar with Don Cherry in some way, shape, or form? I feel like Don Cherry had some sort of "Archie Bunker's Place" nonsense thing on TV for a while...but I'm not Canadian...
 
  • Like
Reactions: jigglysquishy

Ad

Ad

Ad