Hockey players' body weight

Calderon

Registered User
Mar 24, 2006
1,182
792
Are hockey players' weights generally exaggerated similarly as NBA players' height? Typically pro hockey players aren't built like tanks and their body types are probably mostly mesomorph ie. not the most muscular type. Where they have a lot of muscle and weight compared to an average Joe is legs, as some players are often described to have thighs like tree trunks.

I'm 6'2 and weigh around 185-190 lbs. My body type is mesomorph as well and I'm toned. I recently filled in a web form for my ideal body weight and supposedly it's only 165-170 lbs. This is why looking at some players' weight my eyebrows raise up.

Then I see players like Kiril Kaprizov with claimed weight of 202 lbs at 5'10, Teuvo Teräväinen at 191/5'11 and Jeff Skinner at 200/5'11. None of these guys seem that big. I guess some examples to the contrary exist as well, such as Nikolai Ehlers at 172 lbs and 6'0.

Does the body weight get exaggerated or do big thigh muscles explain most of it? Other than the legs, how does a hockey player's body typically differ from the average joe who's reasonably fit and goes jogging and hits the gym twice a week?

(The quoted data is from NHL.com)
 

KirkAlbuquerque

#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
Mar 12, 2014
35,791
42,521
New York
Yeah it’s really hard to believe the weights on some of these guys. But who knows, they all have powerful lower bodies so maybe that adds lbs but most hockey players are not very big, bulk wise. So I find it hard to believe that someone like Jack or Quinn Hughes is actually 190 lbs or whatever
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
31,011
16,324
There is a world of difference between regular people ideal weights and professional athlete ideal weight. In contact sports carrying around mass is useful, provided you can move the mass around effectively. And yes, hockey players have disproportionately dense legs compared to a lot of other sports. Which if not wearing shorts isn't very obvious.

Edit - For the Hughes reference

1729704682848.png
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,528
125,640
NYC
Mass and density is not something that's as apparent as height is.

I'm 256. Granted, I could eat less ice cream, but I'm far from obese. You wouldn't see me from a distance and say "holy shit that guy's fat." You would never think I'm 256. People have guessed as low as 205.

I'm just really, really dense. I would imagine a disproportionate amount of successful athletes (not me, I'm worthless!) are also really dense.
 

Cup or Bust

Registered User
Oct 17, 2017
4,391
3,863
The hip, leg, butt area likely impacts it a lot. Most of these guys also do weight training as well so there is muscle mass there. I grew up playing hockey and pants have always been an issue for me. a lot of pants fit my waist but I can't even fit my legs in them so I think a lot of athletes can look lean but weigh more then what they might appear. It also might depend on when they get weighed as well, they might weigh more at the start of the season if they did lots of training in the summer and then lose some weight as the season goes on just simply due to constant games and practices all the time and less weight training. There could be a be a 10-15 pound swing for some guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hotcabbagesoup

Ghost of Murph

Registered User
Dec 23, 2023
1,046
1,740
Look at pics of Steen, Crosby, Matthews, etc that show their mid to upper thighs and it will be clear why those guys weigh more than most fit people of the same height. There is a lot of weight in dense muscle mass. NHL players many times have freakish looking thighs.

A lot of NCAA/NFL CBs, RBs and WRs also have hard to belief weight/height ratios. I knew a corner who played at an SEC school back in the day. He was 5'9" but weighed 200-205. Tiny waist with simply massive leg muscles. Ripped and super fast. Had a heck of a time trying to find jeans that fit properly back then. I totally believe the listed weights of NHL players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SirJW

Acallabeth

Post approved by Ovechkin
Jul 30, 2011
10,073
1,540
Moscow
Well, here is Kaprizov trying a tug of war against Kovalchuk (who is 6'2, 220-230 lbs). His size stats seem believable to me:



Remember that hypertrophy training isn't nearly as important for hockey players as it is for the gym bros. I still remember that guy from like 2012 who claimed that his cousin was in a better shape than Chara because of larger pecs :laugh:
Teams also pump height/weight up all the time. Give everyone like an extra inch and 10-15 pounds on paper.
It may make some sense for prospects (I remember how concerned people were about Michkov's size before the draft, and the guy is pretty stocky), but I don't think pro teams pay much attention to height and weight of established players. We've discussed the other day that Malkin had been listed at the same height and weight for 15 years before growing taller and heavier at 38 lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Randyne and bossram

hotcabbagesoup

"I'm going to get what I deserve" -RutgerMcgroarty
Feb 18, 2009
10,678
14,710
Reno, Nevada
Mass and density is not something that's as apparent as height is.

I'm 256. Granted, I could eat less ice cream, but I'm far from obese. You wouldn't see me from a distance and say "holy shit that guy's fat." You would never think I'm 256. People have guessed as low as 205.

I'm just really, really dense. I would imagine a disproportionate amount of successful athletes (not me, I'm worthless!) are also really dense.

Says he weighs 256 but is not obese.

Username is machinehead.

Is his head made of machines?

Is he an android? :naughty::naughty:
 

JKG33

Leafs & Kings
Oct 31, 2009
7,563
11,454
Winnipeg
It's all about build. Most athletes obviously have more muscle than your average person. As a washed up hockey player turned gym rat, I'm 5'10 215ish, and there's dudes of similar height yet 30lbs lighter who look fatter than I am.

In the case of hockey players specifically, our legs are massive from a lifetime of training. It makes sense that to be much heavier than your average person.
 

I am Bettman

Registered User
May 23, 2022
684
1,549
Yeah everybody usually gets a 10-15 lbs bump, and players usually lose 5-10 lbs throughout the season. The bump is much higher for smaller players. Bedard weighed in at 185 at the combine and looks much beefier than others listed as 185.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,528
125,640
NYC
Says he weighs 256 but is not obese.

Username is machinehead.

Is his head made of machines?

Is he an android? :naughty::naughty:
As far as they know, I'm human.

My legs are like friggin redwoods, so yeah, people are right about the legs thing.

I actually got blessed with a great hockey body and absolutely not one squirt of talent.

And I'm not saying I don't have some extra going on in the belly. Picture Chris Kreider but in dad shape.
 

FrozenJagrt

Registered User
Dec 16, 2009
10,544
4,622
Mass and density is not something that's as apparent as height is.

I'm 256. Granted, I could eat less ice cream, but I'm far from obese. You wouldn't see me from a distance and say "holy shit that guy's fat." You would never think I'm 256. People have guessed as low as 205.

I'm just really, really dense. I would imagine a disproportionate amount of successful athletes (not me, I'm worthless!) are also really dense.
True enough. I have a friend who is a big guy, around 6'3" and played defensive tackle in football. Based on my being 180, i guessed he was about 275. He was actually 320 (though has since dropped down to 300!)
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
22,559
21,168
Denver Colorado
Multiple players have talked about losing around 20 lbs during the season

Subban had a good video on this

Lack of gym time, and eating habits that you have in the offseason.
 

KaN19

Registered User
Jun 25, 2023
195
722
Mass and density is not something that's as apparent as height is.

I'm 256. Granted, I could eat less ice cream, but I'm far from obese. You wouldn't see me from a distance and say "holy shit that guy's fat." You would never think I'm 256. People have guessed as low as 205.

I'm just really, really dense. I would imagine a disproportionate amount of successful athletes (not me, I'm worthless!) are also really dense.
Yeah man, whatever helps you sleep at night.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,743
14,674
Somewhere on Uranus
Mass and density is not something that's as apparent as height is.

I'm 256. Granted, I could eat less ice cream, but I'm far from obese. You wouldn't see me from a distance and say "holy shit that guy's fat." You would never think I'm 256. People have guessed as low as 205.

I'm just really, really dense. I would imagine a disproportionate amount of successful athletes (not me, I'm worthless!) are also really dense.
I am 6-2 and 250 and unless you see up close and personal I do not look that fat
 
  • Like
Reactions: Machinehead

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
147,528
125,640
NYC
True enough. I have a friend who is a big guy, around 6'3" and played defensive tackle in football. Based on my being 180, i guessed he was about 275. He was actually 320 (though has since dropped down to 300!)
Good for him! I need to lose 20 pounds too. But I would probably be a lean 230.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
28,722
11,086
Does the body weight get exaggerated or do big thigh muscles explain most of it? Other than the legs, how does a hockey player's body typically differ from the average joe who's reasonably fit and goes jogging and hits the gym twice a week?
NHLers have very thick lower bodies. So, the weight probably isn't going to be that odd. If you only see from the mid section up after a game, you probably won't see it. Unlike with football players where non Linemen look massive with their upper body muscles (closer to NHL size).
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
35,127
33,504
I was a lean 5'10 190 in college. I used to have people guess my weight, I don't think anyone ever guessed over 175.

Most people couldn't tell that I had massive quads. It was fun trying to find pants.

Anecdote: I had a wrestler friend who had a 28" waist. He used to get drunk and show girls how his belt could barely fit around one of my legs. It was kind of odd, but in retrospect, there are worse ways to get girls to grab your thighs.
 

eXile3

Registered User
Dec 12, 2020
4,427
4,225
I think it’s both. Weights are exaggerated but also legs have some of the biggest muscles in the body and probably contribute to it.
 

I Hate Blake Coleman

Bandwagon Burner
Jul 22, 2008
24,259
8,358
Saskatchewan
Bobrovsky lost up to 10 pounds in one game during the playoffs last season (might've been 2023).

Hockey players don't need to "look" big. They're not gym bros training for aesthetics. They have to play high level, physical work with a lot of cardio/endurance.
 

FrozenJagrt

Registered User
Dec 16, 2009
10,544
4,622
Good for him! I need to lose 20 pounds too. But I would probably be a lean 230.
Yeah I'm proud of the guy. After he stopped playing he became pretty self conscious about his weight. A LOT of it is muscle, but he is so hyper-focused on the number on the scale, so he's been working super hard to shed some pounds. Admirable stuff
 

bossram

Registered User
Sep 25, 2013
16,580
16,913
Victoria
I don't really think the player weight numbers are inflated much. As someone who weight trains (competitive powerlifter), they seem pretty believable for guys who weight train a lot - particularly in the offseason. As others said, there's a lot of mass in your legs, and hockey players would mostly focus their weight training on their lower body.

The heights, yeah, we know every player gets an inch or two tacked on.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad