I think your standards are very low then.
Calling this a C team is a little much too. I don't know the players as well as you do, but realistically this is the best of the non-NTDP players minus a few kids here or there that were snubbed or injured or not playing for whatever reason. And considering a number of these players are better than the NTDP players, I think calling this any worse than a B (or if you want to get really strict a B-) team is stretching it.
And then I'd point you to the fact that they lost 3 of their 5 games. A US team losing 3 of 5 in any tournament is just too much losing. I don't know why anyone would be okay with that. Maybe that's their level, but they won the shot battle in 4 of the 5 games (only lost it to Canada by 6, tied for least of any team). They also lost the goalie battle in all three of their losses. I don't think the goaltending was that bad against Czechia, but gave up the decisive goal late in the game. Against Canada and Sweden, it was flat out bad. I'd even suggest it was flat out bad against Germany, although it didn't really matter there. Cameron gave up a fade away off balance wrister in a close game to Canada and then a goal from below the goal line against Sweden.
Seems a little much to say the goaltending and defense was both good when the goalies were 9th, 10th, and 17th (of 17) at this tournament in SV%. Either the goaltending was hung out to dry by bad defense or they didn't stop shots they should've. My conclusion is that the goaltending was weak and a lot worse than the nations they lost to (I think probably also worse than Finland). I think the defense was okay. Not great, but I didn't think it lost us these games. Offense lacked difference makers. Yes, there's enough speed, skill, hockey sense, along with a hard working team and a good defense. That's going to keep you in games at a weak tournament like this (no Russia, as bad of a Finland as we've seen in a long time), but they didn't have the difference makers in net or up front to win games that their system got them in. And even on the back-end, none of these guys are anywhere near a player like Schaefer. A few of the defensemen might make the NHL, but probably like bottom pairing guys at that level.
When it becomes to overall draft picks, last 5 teams have have 11 in 2019, 9 in 2020, 12 in 2022, 7 in 2023, and 7 in 2024. This team is looking like the lower end for that I think. Rombach, Fiddler, Grimes, Simpson, Kevan, and then I think a few of Lansing, Sykora, Hayes, Moe, Bleyl, and Cameron end up getting picked at some point (whether their first year or another). So probably around 7. Maybe not a vintage US Hlinka team, but this team should've been better than 3 losses in 5 games.