GDT: HFBoards GDT 2/18/19

[spintheblackcircle]

wha?

 

[Rydan]

the high stick did not hit it in so they cant look at it. i think?

 

[canucks20]

That ref should not be reffing NHL

 

[CK17]

Funny hearing Jack Edwards say take the call and move on.

 

[Slasher45]

This is the worst call I have ever seen.

I've seen worse in this game alone..

 

[Matt24]

That’s unacceptable and it’s hilariously watching Jack Edwards of all people act like it’s all cool.

 

[compan]

Jesus these refs must live in Boston.

Lol are you serious? Have you watched the game?

 

[Hellraising Senator]

Sharks get jobbed, 1st no goal call on a goal. Now they get scores on my a goal that should not count. Classic officiating by the NHL

 

[WeDislikeEich]

Wow, what a BS goal.

His stick was a good foot above the crossbar! Unbelievable that they let the goal stand.

 

[dechire]

How is that not reviewable ? I'm sure I've seen it reviewed before

 

[Paper]

High-sticking goals can be reviewed, but this wasn't a high-sticking goal, it was played downwards and then shot in. They had to call the play dead, but didn't, so nothing could be reviewed.

 

[Anglesmith]

For what it's worth, once they decide not to call a high stick on the ice, they are not able to review that. If it had gone in directly, it's another matter.

 

[saffronleaf]

it's always like this for the bruins. ridiculous.

 

[StupidityKills]

Wow how can a ref standing right behind the net miss that? Obviously knocked down with a high stick.

 

[saffronleaf]

disgraceful bush league. no wonder no one watches.

 

[WatchOut]

whats the diffence between this play and nylanders disallowed goal from yesterday ?

 

[Mr Fahrenheit]

Refs have been on Bostons side all game, why change now?

 

[JoeThorntonsRooster]

That referee should be fined or fired. Absolutely inexcusable.

 

[CherryToke]

The refs done f***ed up again

 

[compan]

Sharks get jobbed, 1st no goal call on a goal. Now they get scores on my a goal that should not count. Classic officiating by the NHL

Yeah that wasn’t a goal by Wagner, but the first goal which was a goal was taken back. So we’re even I guess now.

 

[Sheppy]

Well, I mean the Bruins should have had 5 anyway.

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

You can't challenge a high stick that didn't result in a goal. Wagner hit it, then hit it again. When he first made contact looked to be at his shoulder, which determines if it's a high stick, or not, as long as the puck doesn't go in. If it went in as a result of that initial hit, then it's based on crossbar.

It looked fine.

 

[cliffclaven]

Lol are you serious? Have you watched the game?

Yeah, I just watched the last goal. Lmfao.

 

[Yeti of the Flow]

Refs have been on Bostons side all game, why change now?

Eh? There have been several high sticks that weren't called in the Sharks favor. Also, a goal in the first.

 

[StupidityKills]

How is that not reviewable ? I'm sure I've seen it reviewed before

It's not reviewable because he touched it again. The ref determined(wrongly) that it wasn't a high stick, follow by the shot that went in. If it had gone directly in it could have been reviewed.