State of Hockey
Registered User
- Oct 9, 2006
- 13,382
- 796
That would certainly not tone down the complaining.The right call but takes out another beautiful play from the game. They should have some discretion regarding if it has effect on the goal.
Honestly, I'm fine with it. It's a rule. Sucks, butThat would certainly not tone down the complaining.
The odd part about those calls is, to me, if the goal doesn't count, why don't they reset the clock to the moment the call was missed and not count any shots or anything else that happened in the meantime?
That would certainly not tone down the complaining.
The right call but takes out another beautiful play from the game. They should have some discretion regarding if it has effect on the goal.
I think there should be a nullification if the defending team gains full possession at any point, but even that could have some judgment too.Honestly, I'm fine with it. It's a rule. Sucks, but
. .
You are rightI think they do reset the clock don't they? Have no idea if they take shots off or anything though.
The NHL dreamed up a solution to a problem that didn't really exist. Judging how many goals are deemed offside on slow motion replay we could probably cut 100 or so off Gretzky and Ovechkin's totals too.
Or because Panthers are sneaky dirty.This game getting nasty and all it took was cross-checking Barkov in the back of the head. Christ, you'd think they were playing Edmonton.
That seems like a reasonable solutionI think there should be a nullification if the defending team gains full possession at any point, but even that could have some judgment too.
It should be a ten second cutoff (still a very generous amount of time) and the review should last no longer than thirty seconds. This would end 90% of complaints and catch the actual cases where it should have been called and the linesman fell down or something.
Or because Panthers are sneaky dirty.
We're still a little greasyThe Panthers haven't been dirty the last two years. The rep they're getting is from the run they had to the finals and didn't win and they don't play that way anymore.
We're still a little greasy
We're still a little greasy
It's frustration, the dirty plays. And everyone hates playing Tkachuk, and, because the refs don't give him much leeway, boneheads think they can elbow him and whatever else. Sometimes he really does ask for it, gets him into the game. That's what I mean by greasy.The Panthers are definitely still a little greasy, but most of the time it seems like they're content to just play sixty, shoot the puck around, and go home on these west coast trips. I'll never understand why teams do shit like this and decide 'yeah, I think I'll get nasty with these guys in a December out of conference game.' Pointless. Vancouver and Calgary both played pretty clean games and beat the Cats like a rented mule in this same road trip.