Probably hung over.Did Draisaitl change his pregame meal to nyquil and quaaludes or something? He looks stoned as hell.
He still has game changing rushes, it just looks more mental to me
They all realize he needs McDavid
Wait till you see the Devils goalWow ! Awful call in Boston.
They changed the rules explicitly to permit that since it's a continuation of the shot.Nah in a league where "intent to blow the whistle" exists, this goal shouldn't have happened tbh
Continuous Play rule (Rule 37), which states that a goal may be awarded, even after a whistle is blown, "if the puck entered the net as the culmination of a continuous play, where the result of the original shot was unaffected by any whistle blown[...]"
So what about all those goals that have been ruled out because ' the ref was intending to blow the whistle'Continuous Play rule (Rule 37), which states that a goal may be awarded, even after a whistle is blown, "if the puck entered the net as the culmination of a continuous play, where the result of the original shot was unaffected by any whistle blown[...]"
Show me the alternatives when they disallow a goal due to "intent to blow the whistle" when it's a clear ass goal due to this "continuous play" rule.They changed the rules explicitly to permit that since it's a continuation of the shot.
By "continuous play" they mean like what happened here, a shot is taken and the puck keeps going and into the net. They don't mean someone digging at the goalie for a loose puck, those still factor in "intent to blow the whistle". The rule was specifically amended to fix situations exactly like today.Show me the alternatives when they disallow a goal due to "intent to blow the whistle" when it's a clear ass goal due to this "continuous play" rule.
Oh wait, that's most of the overturned goals from "intent to whistle"
The difference is the “continuous play”, and shot unaffected by the whistle part.So what about all those goals that have been ruled out because ' the ref was intending to blow the whistle'