GDT: HFBoards GDT | 02/21/2015

[The Nuge]

Logic would say that's in. It just has to be. But you can't see the puck, and it wasn't called a goal

 

[quat]

It has been for quite a while now

So many bad reads and pinches. Gets caught a ton.

He needs press box time. Especially with the jets carrying 8/9 d men

I haven't caught enough Jet's games this season. Sounds like a tough season for Stewart. Luckily for him that PP wasn't very dangerous.

 

[Sh00terMcGavin]

Longest review I've ever seen in this Pens-Blues game. Just make a call, I don't care what it is at this point lol.

 

[hisgirlfriday]

Should be a Crosby goal, but probably gonna call it no-goal.

This has to be one of the longest goal reviews I can remember.

 

[BruinsBtn]

This game has improved as the animosity has grown.

All hockey improves with animosity, yet they're trying to take it away.

 

[penguins2946*]

Logic would say that's in. It just has to be. But you can't see the puck, and it wasn't called a goal

Yeah this sums it up perfectly. That's so clearly a goal, but it wasn't called a goal and there's nothing there that could conclusively say it was a goal.

 

[Shaftception]

That's probably the best example since they instituted the video replay confirming a goal system of a has to be a goal but there's no 100% visual evidence to prove it.

Logic dictates, especially on the zoomed in replay, the puck dissappears under elliot's toe pad and goes behind the post, there's no way it's not in the goal, there's just no visual proof.

 

[Marc the Habs Fan]

Jokinen ruining the Leafs tank! Sets-up JVR. Leafs win.

 

[The Nuge]

Awful result on that one. That's why it'd be good if they could get some sort of puck tracker, that doesn't affect the feel/performance of the puck

 

[King Woodballs]

Another brutal goal by hutchinson

 

[3074326]

Puck is at least behind the blocker, blocker is behind the line. That's a goal. I understand why they made the call, but the fact that we can't call it a goal is frustrating.

 

[Pyrophorus]

That will shut the Jets fans up, for a bit!

 

[Fabs]

Only the 2nd team to lose to the Leafs in like 18 games. Thanks Jets.

 

[Canucks LB]

Canucks just caught a huge break, massive point loss by the jets, nobody saw them losing this one.

 

[PensFanSince1989]

Yeah this sums it up perfectly. That's so clearly a goal, but it wasn't called a goal and there's nothing there that could conclusively say it was a goal.

bull you couldn't conclusively say it wasn't a goal. The NHL review room just needs bigger balls. It was a goal, and you could conclusively say that. Unless the puck vanished into a black hole when the pad clearly went well over the line.

 

[Duffman955]

****ing ****ty jets ruining our tank

 

[King Woodballs]

Canucks just caught a huge break, massive point loss by the jets, nobody saw them losing this one.

I did
The jets are slump busters

 

[quat]

Another brutal goal by hutchinson

Well, it's one you certainly don't want to let in, but still that's a prime scoring area and it was an excellent shot stick side. If this game is any indication, the Jets still haven't solved their goalie problems.

Really hope your team makes the playoffs. Really like their size and speed.

 

[hisgirlfriday]

Backes trying to tackle Malkin

 

[King Woodballs]

I haven't caught enough Jet's games this season. Sounds like a tough season for Stewart. Luckily for him that PP wasn't very dangerous.

Been a long year for him. Got hurt and has been even more terrible then usual since.

 

[Shaftception]

bull you couldn't conclusively say it wasn't a goal. The NHL review room just needs bigger balls. It was a goal, and you could conclusively say that. Unless the puck vanished into a black hole when the pad clearly went well over the line.

The rule says nothing about logical assumption, only 100% visual evidence of the puck across the line, they'd need to rewrite the rule, which I doubt they'd be willing to do just to remove the possibility of an important game being decided by logic without definitive proof.

 

[The Grim Reaper*]

Blues are losing their composure instead of trying to win a game.

 

[Lazlo Hollyfeld]

nice dive by Benn there in the Wings Stars game.

 

[hisgirlfriday]

Hopefully the new technology stuff the NHL has been experimenting with can result in sensors being in the posts or puck or something that they have another way to call good goals good even when the camera can't show them as in.

 

[PensFanSince1989]

The rule says nothing about logical assumption, only 100% visual evidence of the puck across the line, they'd need to rewrite the rule, which I doubt they'd be willing to do just to remove the possibility of an important game being decided by logic without definitive proof.

And there was 100% visual evidence that the puck crossed the line there.

They need bigger balls. I realize the standard the NHL has used in the past has been beyond stupid, which is why I expected this to be called no goal from the start. But that doesn't mean it's right. The puck went under his pad. His pad proceeded to go all the way over the line. You can see that clearly. Unless the puck entered some sort of void or turned invisible, it was over the line.