HFBoards GDT | 02/07/15
- Thread starter Chairman Maouth
- Start date
- Status
Wild backed off by not getting many shots during the last 2 periods though. But their defense and goaltending finished the job. This was the 3rd straight shutout against the Avs this season. That is a crazy stat that makes no sense to me.
Anglesmith
Setting up the play?
So... earlier in the season I learned that if a defenceman pushes the net off after a shot has been taken, it doesn't matter if the net was off before the puck crossed the line. So this Pittsburgh goal should stand up unless they determine that a) Sutter pushed it off, not Stanton or b) a Penguin touched it after the net was off and before it went in.
CaptBrannigan
Registered User
Goal should definitely count, if only for the fact that it was going in and the only reason it didn't was the Canucks defenseman throwing himself into the net. The only play he was trying to make was removing the net.
Shaftception
Registered User
- Apr 6, 2011
- 4,186
- 1,729
polarbearcub
Registered User
Anglesmith
Setting up the play?
Yeah, so this goal counted:
[nhl]642781[/nhl]
With the justification that the shot had been taken before the net was pushed off. They didn't appear to factor that into this decision, because all they said was "the call on the ice stands that the net was off before the puck crossed the line."
[nhl]642781[/nhl]
With the justification that the shot had been taken before the net was pushed off. They didn't appear to factor that into this decision, because all they said was "the call on the ice stands that the net was off before the puck crossed the line."
CaptBrannigan
Registered User
Watch the way Stanton throws himself into the post and makes no play for the puck. I feel in this situation where a goal is a foregone conclusion except for a dman doing that then the goal should count.
Red
Registered User
Yeah I would not have been pissed if they called that a goal. Puck on the line/going over the line pretty much the exact same millisecond Sutter knocks the net off.
Anglesmith
Setting up the play?
I don't think Sutter would've affected the net position in any way at all without Stanton barrelling in and taking everything out. But that's a call that if they had determined that it was Sutter, not Stanton, then it's non-reviewable I'm guessing.
Red
Registered User
In that clip, the defensive player knocked the net off. Here, the offensive player knocked the net off.
Anglesmith
Setting up the play?
Red
Registered User
From the replay, it seemed clear to me that Sutter's body was taking the net off already as he had momentum from trying to tap the puck in but missing, Stanton makes a defensive desperation play for Sutter's stick which maybe pushes Sutten into the net faster as a consequence? I just don't think you can say Stanton takes the net off there.
CaptBrannigan
Registered User
Referees need to build up some stamina, that's the second premature whistle they've had this game when Griess hasn't had the puck.
Danish Pastry
this is dream!
Novak Djokovic
#24 and counting... #GOAT
- Dec 10, 2006
- 23,197
- 1,481
Letang needs to stop complaining. The refs are purposely not calling when players are making infractions against him. I mean, that's not supposed to happen in a professional league, but refs hold grudges, sadly. He got slashed...no call. He complained. He got tripped..no call. He complained and got 2 mins unsportsmanlike instead.
PensPlz
Registered User
Danish Pastry
this is dream!
bluefan
Registered User
- Nov 18, 2011
- 3,099
- 450
Canucks LB
My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
- Oct 12, 2008
- 78,724
- 33,581
NewBoysClub97*
All-Star
refs really screwing the Penguins tonight, One of the worst officiated games I have seen. 2 goals minimum scored on plays where Pitsburgh should have drew penalties and some phantom calls. Pens getting slashed and tackled and the refs put the whistles int he pocket lol. Probably annoyed of Pens players chirping them all game.
- Status
