- May 9, 2014
- 5,823
- 8,238
I agree to some extent but ultimately it’s about the end game, as long as he becomes an NHL D-man it won’t matter how he gets there. I’m fairly neutral on him, I think he could go either way. However a lot of his issues are ones that can be coached, so it comes down to if he can figure out the problems before he needs to clear waivers. If not we move him this summer before he loses all value.People are confusing "moving down the depth chart" with giving up on Clague.
Clague isn't earning a spot on the NHL roster based on his performance. Players like Anderson, Bjornfot, etc, who are younger are making better cases.
I get it's a learning experience for all, but he needs to be outplaying younger and less experienced players. That's not unreasonable.
I don’t think he’s top 4 material, but should hopefully be a solid bottom pairing guy that contributes on the power play. I’m therefore not worried that Anderson and Björnfot are outplaying him, both have higher upsides so I see it as a good thing (draft position ceases to be relevant the day after the draft). Big minutes in the AHL this year should ultimately make or break him as a King.