I can get the transformation over a period of six months to a year. Especially since we know Nas is not as innocent as we thought he was.
He was bullied due to his ethnicity after 911, I get it. It seems he has quite the temper though. Maybe Andrea did something that set him off. Why the hell are you going to make yourself appear like a criminal at your own trial.
I want to see if the chain of custody issue comes up, as well as any forensic experts for the defense - do they even have the money for it?
1) He's innocent of the crime. Why does he have to be a saint at Rikers Island in order to get through the ordeal of being at RI?
2) You'd have a temper too if you had to deal with trying to prove your innocence, while being bullied your entire adolescent life because of the colour of your skin, and for white people crapping on you for something you didn't do. You'd also be pretty angry if you lived in a conservative household that didn't allow the freedom that you sought. How can you not empathise with that? It's what many Indians, Pakistanis, and muslims(of many nationalities) go through. It's the juxtaposition of being a conservative and living in a liberal country. It's hard to reconcile the two. Reconciling it leads to frustration and anger. Both inwards and outwards.
3) Chain of custody is going to play an important part of the trial, I agree. People in the 'justice' system is so quick to judge and act, which allows for innocent people to get incarcerated and guilty people to go free or get light sentences. It's a complete sham.
4) Nas is being railroaded. He isn't helping his legal cause, but he's trying to survive in a place where justice is slow and doesn't wait for your innocence to be proven.
And, Andrea didn't do anything to set him off. She was his one escape/outlet away from his crap life. He really liked her. He wouldn't have harmed her. She was his 'best self', or at least his 'escape'.
They DA was told by her boss to expedite things due to some other high profile case coming up or something.
You're right, the DA wanted this case done quickly. DA didn't want media attention, etc. They moved the case up the court docket as quickly and quietly as they could. And this was the high profile case. The DA just didn't want it to become so high profile by letting it linger in the system.
Point of reference: The trial of James Holmes, the Aurora Theater shooter, saw over 2 years between arraignment and the seating of the jury. Not a complete analog since the Holmes trial had the largest jury pool in US history, but just an example of how long the process can take in real life for high profile murder cases.
You're referencing a factual case vs a fictional one. The DA always has the ability to move cases up.
Your example has no bearing on this dramatisation of the legal process.
Either way, this is the same problem I have with Game of Thrones. If you don't want to time changes to seem abrupt, convey the passage better to your audience. B roll of seasons changing (cliche, but you get it). Boom, done. Not everyone is going to know how long it takes for an average case to get to trial, and it didn't seem evenly spaced out anyway.
I also don't like how they just completely forgot about the Duane footchase in the previous episode. It's as if it never happened. That seems pretty sloppy.
It's still a fine show, but you can start to see some of the exposed threads of the limited series when you stop to think about it.
It's a limited series run. What did you expect?
And, you don't know if the whole situation with Duane is over. Like GoT, things get brought up later that were addressed earlier. You just don't have any patience before you critique.
I enjoy the show very much but I'm a little confused with the general direction the show Is headed, it's somewhat disappointing with these past 2 episodes... how they can completely ignore what happened at the end of the last episode is stupid and the fact it takes them 7 episodes to bring up Andrea's a 22 year old girl living in a place like that, with the potential angry step-dad angle, a bit ridiculous IMO.
and I feel like Nas is a goner. I'm talking like, he's dead.
They may not have ignored it at all. Why can't you have a little patience to see how it gets tied together? What a ridiculous criticism.
And, bringing up Andrea's living situation is now warranted. Prior to that, the show was dealing with who died, how she died, who the main suspect was, and their journey through the criminal justice system, the mechanism of defense vs prosection. It was only now that tertiary information of who Andrea was, who she knew, why she lived where she lived, who she was related to, etc, is relevant after. This is not an episode of CSI.
These last 2 episodes have to be great to save it for me.
Went from a potentially great interesting show to a disappointment really quick. I couldn't care less about the outcome right now and that sucks as it takes my investment out of it.
I just can't wait til it's over.
Why?