Naz is such a loser now. All Tatted up and smoking crack.
He will probably be found innocent but he ends up killing someone in the jail and will stay because of that..
Still enjoying the show, minus the female prosecutor. Holy hell her character is boring.
But I really had higher hopes for the show as a whole from the beginning, and the last episodes have been rather flat for me.... And seem to be more of what I expect going forward, rather than the higher standard it set for me earlier on.
I'm also not really buying into this whole new Nas and his transition in prison. Maybe if it was a longer concept for a show, and drawn out longer.... but not as quickly as they're making it happen. Don't buy it at all.
Just because the transition in Nas' character is happening quickly in the show, doesn't mean that it's happening quickly in real life. It would appear to me that a lot of time has passed, and they don't have enough hours to draw it out over 4-5 episodes. They're assuming that the viewer can connect the dots enough to figure out that Nas has undergone a change over a matter of months, not a matter of days.
Has that much time really passed? I haven't seen anything to suggest whether it has or has not.
I've held back on theorizing too much at this point, but...
[spoil]
I think what will happen is with all these red herrings and potential suspects coming to the surface, John and Chandra will be able to drum up enough reasonable doubt that the jury will acquit Nas, only for us (and John & Chandra) to find out immediately prior or soon thereafter that he actually is the killer.
[/spoil]
If this is the case, the original outline of the show (critic of the doubtful justice system) is pretty much pointless, isn't it?
1) is that the outline of the show or is that just the assumption that everyone watching has made based on the fact that we are lead to believe that he didn't do it?
2) I don't see why the theory suggested in the spoiler would conflict with the critique of the justice system. I don't see them as mutually exclusive.
Perhaps, although I think we're still getting a pretty good critique of the system one way or another.If this is the case, the original outline of the show (critic of the doubtful justice system) is pretty much pointless, isn't it?
And that assumption remains until we find out the truth, based on how the story is being told.It doesn't necessarily conflict with it, but it would be far from having the same affect.
The assumption of Naz being innocent is what makes the show as intriguing as it is.
No talk of tonight's episode yet? Looks like the step-dad could be the killer, there's definitely motive there, but does the series end that simply?
It's what several sources state before the series began and what the first impression of the trailer confirms.
Totally fair. I think the true goal of the show is to create an immensely suspenseful journey for the viewer by enabling all these potential theories. My prediction is as good as the next guys'. I think there's probably at least 5 promising theories given all the leads we've been thrown.Fair enough. Not meaning to sound disrespectful or condescending. I appreciate contrary inputs. I just don't see that turn to happen.
Critics were sent all episodes in advance except for the finale.That's based on what reviewers, who I don't believe were shown more than a few episodes said. I don't think they had the complete picture.