Rumor: - Hawks expected to make big splash (Robertson, Knies, etc) | Page 79 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: Hawks expected to make big splash (Robertson, Knies, etc)

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.

Trade, offer sheet or not go after Robertson


  • Total voters
    90
Theres nothing short term about Byram.

It's entirely short-term in mindset.

The contract will obviously be long-term, likely at a #1D number for a player that has never proven he can be a #1D.

But the decision to trade assets for this player was to try and plug a hole quickly, regardless of whether the plug would be effective enough to move the needle for the team, or whether the price of said plug was worthy of the hole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blackhawkswincup
It's entirely short-term in mindset.

The contract will obviously be long-term, likely at a #1D number for a player that has never proven he can be a #1D.

But the decision to trade assets for this player was to try and plug a hole quickly, regardless of whether the plug would be effective enough to move the needle for the team, or whether the price of said plug was worthy of the hole.
Was K'Andre Miller a 1 when Carolina made that deal and gave him 8x8.5? People said it was terrible...let it play out ffs
 
Was K'Andre Miller a 1 when Carolina made that deal and gave him 8x8.5? People said it was terrible...let it play out ffs

Carolina paid a top-10 protected 1st rounder+ for Miller.

They literally had protection written into the trade to ensure they DID NOT GIVE AWAY a pick as valuable as the Blackhawks did, PLUS.
 
Last edited:
The fact you guys are obsessed with attacking Sharks rebuild a team that was in playoff fight this past year and is going to add Stenberg and already has a young core outperforming Hawks young core says alot about how you really feel about Hawks situation
We were ahead of them while playing in a tougher division before Bedard got injured..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toews2Bickell
Was K'Andre Miller a 1 when Carolina made that deal and gave him 8x8.5? People said it was terrible...let it play out ffs

Did K'Andre Miller have extensive history of concussoins and cost a #4, a young top 4 RD who has done nothing but improve as player in recent years and a good 2nd round pick?

Also was Miller being gifted contract of a #1 defender based on "hope"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: FireKDnow
It's entirely short-term in mindset.

The contract will obviously be long-term, likely at a #1D number for a player that has never proven he can be a #1D.

But the decision to trade assets for this player was to try and plug a hole quickly, regardless of whether the plug would be effective enough to move the needle for the team, or whether the price of said plug was worthy of the hole.
Were any of those assets going to plug said hole in the next 4 years though?

How would you have plugged this hole?
 
Robertson turned down 8vyear 96 million offer from Dallas...so RFA status and open for an offer sheet which woukd need to be over$14 million per to sign hom in all probability..
 
Were any of those assets going to plug said hole in the next 4 years though?

How would you have plugged this hole?

I would have played it as the best teams in the NHL do.

They determine in-house what any given player's value is - on their roster, in their pipeline, and around the league.

They begin a negotiation low, and move toward that initial evaluation. That initial evaluation is the drop-dead, walk-away point.

If another team is willing to pay more, you do not break from the internal evaluation to out-bid them. You let the other team over-pay and keep your powder dry to ensure you have the assets ready for the next big name to hit the market.

You move on to your contingency options, which will almost certainly cost less. Because you would rather improve your team by a little with surplus value, than improve your team moderately at negative value.

Good teams don't let the market dictate their moves. Bad teams let the market dictate their payment.
 
I would have played it as the best teams in the NHL do.

They determine in-house what any given player's value is - on their roster, in their pipeline, and around the league.

They begin a negotiation low, and move toward that initial evaluation. That initial evaluation is the drop-dead, walk-away point.

If another team is willing to pay more, you do not break from the internal evaluation to out-bid them. You let the other team over-pay and keep your powder dry to ensure you have the assets ready for the next big name to hit the market.

You move on to your contingency options, which will almost certainly cost less. Because you would rather improve your team by a little with surplus value, than improve your team moderately at negative value.

Good teams don't let the market dictate their moves. Bad teams let the market dictate their payment.
How would you have felt about SJ completing the trade with 9,27, and whatever else it was. Would you still say Byram wouldn’t move the needle there? Overpayment? Not worth the upcoming contract?
 
How would you have felt about SJ completing the trade with 9,27, and whatever else it was. Would you still say Byram wouldn’t move the needle there? Overpayment? Not worth the upcoming contract?

Yes.

I would say that paying two first-round picks for Bowen Byram is an overpay that doesn't move the needle anywhere near enough to merit the cost.

You are allowed, as a general manager, to let other teams make mistakes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Paul Allen
It's entirely short-term in mindset.

The contract will obviously be long-term, likely at a #1D number for a player that has never proven he can be a #1D.

But the decision to trade assets for this player was to try and plug a hole quickly, regardless of whether the plug would be effective enough to move the needle for the team, or whether the price of said plug was worthy of the hole.
Its not at all short term mindset. He's 25.
 
Yes.

I would say that paying two first-round picks for Bowen Byram is an overpay that doesn't move the needle anywhere near enough to merit the cost.

You are allowed, as a general manager, to let other teams make mistakes.
What would you have considered appropriate value for Byram in this situation?


Makar, who we can both agree moved the needle, is also a ufa next summer. What would you consider market value for him to be then?
 
What would you have considered appropriate value for Byram in this situation?


Makar, who we can both agree moved the needle, is also a ufa next summer. What would you consider market value for him to be then?
His value is what teams are willing to trade for him, and by the sounds of it, there were plenty of teams interested, and teams put in roughly the same offer we offered.
 
Robertson turned dowm$12 million per for 8 year deal with Dallas..

2 methods to sign hom by other teams:
.Before July 1st...could offer Dallas firsts in a sign and trade for setup on amount he agrees tob=likelyvabove $14milluon to maybe $+6 million per ....if you o the trade he can still sign for 8 years..

However if you wait till after July 1st and just offer sheet him which Dallas does not match they get 4 first anyway but your cobtract with him can be for only for 6 years...
Or if your trade with Dallas cones on or after July 1st this year but is a sign and trade then it can have ax7 year length.

Obviously Robertson n wants an 8 year deal at top money he expects..

So best to make a deal now with DLkas..they getcsame 4 firsts but Robertson coukd getv8 years instead of just 6or 7...
Is he worth 4 firsts?

I presume KD going all 3 firsts in 2027 plus 2028 2st..so the draft carage over after 2027 draft ..
But Bedsy woukd have his dream wnger so who cares about 4 1sts...right?

On th vother hand you could pay Alex Tuchh just $$$$$ without any draft carnage...

Your choice, KD.....

Update.. Tuch now off the market..sign and trade d to Capitals ..8 years $84 million

Obviously KD wanted a bigger fish splash so avoided over payvon Tuch.

Now will overpay on Robertson or Knies...right?
.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad