do you unironically think that there's no such thing as a good or bad deal because every asset always trades exactly at its value by definition? there's no room whatsoever in your mind for a distinction between value and price?
agreed he was the one player I was worried KD might bit on in FA but his age and playoff performance were a huge turnoff. At least Byram fits the age of a younger core veteran
Depends on the team and the position they are in. I only don't like the deal because I dont think the Hawks are ready for a deal like that, but I think the value of Byram is what was paid.
they paid the sabres' price. now all that remains to be seen is what byram's price is, and whether or not he actually provides value proportional to cost.
The price went up when other teams valued him almost as much as the Hawks. Therefore, thats what his value ended up being in a trade.
He was legit brutal against MTL.
so you do unironically think there's no such thing as a good or a bad deal, that the value of any given asset is literally just its sales price, and you only answered the question evasively because when i put it like that it sounds stupid. dope.
"Pardon the interruption"
True. The invisible hand only exists in pricing within a market of many buyers and sellers of a non-differentiated product with a wealth of available product knowledge. None of which exists in an NHL trade,
yeah but what if your neighbor offered 90k for it? when you think about it like that, you can't afford not to.
I paid 30 for a civic a few weeks ago. If someone offered 60 I’d have walked (which is what Davidson probably should’ve done here)
Yes, now it paves the way for JRob
